mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > XYYXF Project

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-05-03, 22:23   #45
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72×131 Posts
Default C277_148_81 done

Code:
Input number is 8251773826007569935997508400258020387415704842496291384921804552005221900662216913425918766759959411986740389289775723397876489045257317273581231513418658422520832086671482588420883344056709719929170923380392719222127153334982010212372015900798480010407898902278648943275730607 (277 digits)
Using B1=300000000-300000000, B2=3299108824840, polynomial Dickson(30), sigma=3:3380894970
Step 1 took 0ms
Step 2 took 1030674ms
********** Factor found in step 2: 9686520884177541535661024084340500289983192555244349
Found prime factor of 52 digits: 9686520884177541535661024084340500289983192555244349
Prime cofactor 851882107587920364660641481266438338230403696173481878562521588790426709670625553787663550972720378015286810501557748588179170143272281107487622422170172133317187820399465875718881126383728000476177931894438551879974742116443 has 225 digits
Also found with sigma=3:4245679786

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-05-03 at 22:24
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-05-20, 22:06   #46
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72·131 Posts
Default

25600@3e8 stage-1 curves completed on C228_150_142.

Owing to a scheduling problem, I won't start stage-2 until tomorrow, and am not quite sure how long it will take.

Starting 30720@3e8 stage-1 curves on C237_139_126
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-05-20, 22:09   #47
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

11001000100112 Posts
Default

Dear XYYXF, can we have some more candidates please?
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-05-21, 22:33   #48
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72·131 Posts
Default

Stage 2 now started on C228_150_142; on 12 threads on an i7-5820K it should take about eleven days and be finished in the evening of June 1st.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-01, 09:42   #49
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72×131 Posts
Default

Stage 2 completed on 25600 curves on C228_150_142; no factor found.

First 12800 of 30720 curves on C237_139_126 completed both stages; no factor found.

Proceeding.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-24, 20:37   #50
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72×131 Posts
Default

30720 curves on C237_139_126 completed, no factors found
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-27, 00:30   #51
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

306810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
Stage 2 completed on 25600 curves on C228_150_142; no factor found.
I started test sieving C228_150_142, just out of idle curiosity. It seems to be a relatively fast sieving 15/33 job, though I'm still gathering data.

How much more ECM is warranted before starting SNFS (assuming that is practical on 15e)?
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-27, 08:15   #52
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
I started test sieving C228_150_142, just out of idle curiosity. It seems to be a relatively fast sieving 15/33 job, though I'm still gathering data.

How much more ECM is warranted before starting SNFS (assuming that is practical on 15e)?
I think we have done enough ECM and can proceed to SNFS at once; I'll be interested to see your timing information once it's available.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-27, 11:16   #53
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22·13·59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
I think we have done enough ECM and can proceed to SNFS at once; I'll be interested to see your timing information once it's available.
Should have results by Friday as I am traveling right now. Yields on 15e were 1.8+ for Q <200M but actual timing data on a modern (though non-bleeding edge) processor using the full range of Q won't be available until I'm home.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-27, 12:25   #54
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

29·61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
I started test sieving C228_150_142, just out of idle curiosity. It seems to be a relatively fast sieving 15/33 job, though I'm still gathering data.

How much more ECM is warranted before starting SNFS (assuming that is practical on 15e)?
Using SNFS-281 (not sure if that's right or not) for difficulty and B1=260e6 with 25600 curves, Bayesian tool says no more ECM.
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-30, 00:40   #55
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22×13×59 Posts
Default C228_150_142 test sieving results

C228_150_142 using the 15e siever, running one case at a time on a lightly loaded i7-3740QM (2.7 GHz) with 16Gb RAM in Win64 environment. Appears to be feasible for 15/33.

Code:
n: 338313268707086634350944196310206935873788335179366657051362293687646025379031678776100858721017586250223875732855601898290781411089750754177921272802024755914362548300092366882262859585028219144728898823695818541135039489183653
# 150^142+142^150, difficulty: 280.89, anorm: 6.00e+037, rnorm: -3.92e+052
# scaled difficulty: 283.36, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 6.177e-014, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.426e-014, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 280
skew: 1.0627
c6: 25
c0: 36
Y1: -38237431646084858983458149164083507643015743502
Y0: 200678255510666758709703572094440460205078125
rlim: 500000000
alim: 500000000
lpbr: 33
lpba: 33
mfbr: 66
mfba: 66
rlambda: 3.0
alambda: 3.0

Test sieving with Q in blocks of 5000
Code:
Q= 20M     9464 rels	0.25046 sec/rel
Q=100M     9185 rels	0.27238 sec/rel
Q=200M     8307 rels	0.33120 sec/rel
Q=300M     7999 rels	0.39008 sec/rel
Q=400M     7337 rels	0.39881 sec/rel
Q=500M     6589 rels	0.49123 sec/rel
Q=600M     5966 rels	0.53501 sec/rel
Q=700M     6007 rels	0.56676 sec/rel
Suggesting a range of 20M-650M+ for Q.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ready GNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 86 2020-03-07 16:23
GNFS targets which need more ECM XYYXF XYYXF Project 295 2017-10-27 12:38
Ready SNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 25 2016-11-20 21:35
SNFS polynomials. chris2be8 FactorDB 1 2012-03-10 16:49
fun with snfs masser Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 36 2008-04-18 02:39

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:05.


Sat Jul 17 04:05:58 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 1:53, 1 user, load averages: 2.32, 2.19, 1.96

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.