![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5×17 Posts |
After collecting 183292403 unique relations for a c231,
msieve reduced to 108119486 relation sets and 0 unique ideals, leading to a failure in LA. Code:
Sat Apr 01 11:51:22 2017 keeping 113702574 ideals with weight <= 200, target excess is 52698204 Sat Apr 01 11:51:32 2017 commencing in-memory singleton removal Sat Apr 01 11:51:38 2017 begin with 183292403 relations and 113702574 unique ideals Sat Apr 01 11:51:50 2017 reduce to 108119487 relations and 1 ideals in 7 passes Sat Apr 01 11:51:50 2017 max relations containing the same ideal: 2 If anybody has an idea, what this (IMO) strange behaviour causes, please let me know. I'm thankful for any ideas how to proceed, for any advice. Alfred |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
486110 Posts |
What large-prime bound did you use? One can guess at a max-rels number to choose, given LP size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5·17 Posts |
In the meantime, the c231 is factored.
I attach the logfile with some comments, including the params for the polyfile at the top. comments are included in the middle of the file, too. The behaviour seems (to me) to be strange at all. I suppose this has nothing to do with the so called large dataset bug. msieve finishes with the options "filter_maxrels=182083000 target_density=140", but fails without. What I am doing wrong? I am thankful for any advice. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Covering sets for a^n-1 | carpetpool | Abstract Algebra & Algebraic Number Theory | 1 | 2017-12-28 12:48 |
| Covering sets | robert44444uk | Computer Science & Computational Number Theory | 15 | 2017-01-04 12:39 |
| A unique bug probably never before seen | fivemack | Msieve | 1 | 2009-08-19 19:59 |
| Any way to reduce CPU usage? | Jarl | Hardware | 5 | 2007-03-30 19:13 |
| Julia Sets | mfgoode | Miscellaneous Math | 2 | 2006-04-04 00:18 |