Fast Breeding (guru management) - Page 72

Max0526 · 2016-11-23, 21:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyb

Nope, not too late. Re-enqueued as a GNFS job.

Amazing, saw the change @ https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/crunching.php

swellman · 2016-11-25, 14:36

C187_141_61

Code:

n: 526657121098891411902436050070158716528458654904454614818025860540606438166582526245802801524071914794227360326006457606922355720409975402247068548242241514728819979533668762972861796531109030008034821790985110403912041407543014278353751
# 141^61+61^141, difficulty: 253.52, anorm: 1.85e+032, rnorm: 8.97e+055
# scaled difficulty: 257.46, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 1.435e-017, alpha = 0.000, combined = 6.541e-014, rroots = 1
type: snfs
size: 253
skew: 1.1824
c5: 61
c0: 141
Y1: -61748917974902741368975281
Y0: 97551820892064552722266841889541788960852432978481
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7

C190_126_113

Code:

n: 3020475564352738970861207613154531084599574839627002004930335003841707290351010097542895316050114527666808035076569996873568511192628633670534884487621298878529631380465288642312645418154293
# 126^113+113^126, difficulty: 258.69, anorm: 2.24e+037, rnorm: -1.95e+049
# scaled difficulty: 260.68, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 7.134e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 9.067e-014, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 258
skew: 2.2390
c6: 1
c0: 126
Y1: -13021089174137413266744892374538813705886513
Y0: 8073100468282043814554026509371035877376
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7

swellman · 2016-11-28, 15:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by swellman

C187_141_61

Code:

n: 526657121098891411902436050070158716528458654904454614818025860540606438166582526245802801524071914794227360326006457606922355720409975402247068548242241514728819979533668762972861796531109030008034821790985110403912041407543014278353751
# 141^61+61^141, difficulty: 253.52, anorm: 1.85e+032, rnorm: 8.97e+055
# scaled difficulty: 257.46, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 1.435e-017, alpha = 0.000, combined = 6.541e-014, rroots = 1
type: snfs
size: 253
skew: 1.1824
c5: 61
c0: 141
Y1: -61748917974902741368975281
Y0: 97551820892064552722266841889541788960852432978481
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7

C190_126_113

Code:

n: 3020475564352738970861207613154531084599574839627002004930335003841707290351010097542895316050114527666808035076569996873568511192628633670534884487621298878529631380465288642312645418154293
# 126^113+113^126, difficulty: 258.69, anorm: 2.24e+037, rnorm: -1.95e+049
# scaled difficulty: 260.68, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 7.134e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 9.067e-014, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 258
skew: 2.2390
c6: 1
c0: 126
Y1: -13021089174137413266744892374538813705886513
Y0: 8073100468282043814554026509371035877376
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7

Please withdraw the above candidates from 15e queue. Based on recent discussions, I am going to run additional ECM on these numbers. Thanks.

fivemack · 2016-12-01, 15:36

C192_139_81 queued up on 15e

It's a moderately large job - yield is ~1 at Q=2^28 so I've queued up half a billion Q, Murphy score for the SNFS polynomial is 1.875e-14, I suspect it'll take three weeks on a six-core machine for the linear algebra.

To compare, C277_150_122 has Murphy 1.811e-14, and the very hard C272_136_105 had 6.387e-15; I think the Murphy scores are usually more predictive of post-processing difficulty than the SNFS size.

RichD · 2016-12-02, 21:59

Another OPN completes ECM with no hits.

Code:

P55.73548_5M.C177
7354840357696348186997141461981606470291584313584199443^5-1

RichD · 2016-12-04, 23:31

Another OPN completes ECM.

Code:

P55.20308_5M.C184
2030891538065513233424079738501246933275925771141004667^5-1

jyb · 2016-12-06, 17:30

Without a fresh infusion of candidates, the 14e queue will run dry in the next day or two. I have four Homogeneous Cunninghams which can go, but they are a little light on ECM. They are all SNFS difficulty 243, and they've received about 4500 curves with B1 = 11e7, plus full runs at t50, t45, etc.

Does anybody have any objections to adding these to the queue? Or alternatively, does anybody have any other candidates which are similarly appropriate for the queue and more completely pre-tested?

RichD · 2016-12-06, 18:12

Another one just finished up.

Code:

P54.47461_5M.C186
474618153564570748818941261819047245816176402854534393^5-1

This is the last one for a while. Unless yoyo completes the four currently queued. I think only a couple of those are 14e eligible.
I have 11 more working but it may be a week or so until they are ready.

swellman · 2016-12-06, 19:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyb

Without a fresh infusion of candidates, the 14e queue will run dry in the next day or two. I have four Homogeneous Cunninghams which can go, but they are a little light on ECM. They are all SNFS difficulty 243, and they've received about 4500 curves with B1 = 11e7, plus full runs at t50, t45, etc.

Does anybody have any objections to adding these to the queue? Or alternatively, does anybody have any other candidates which are similarly appropriate for the queue and more completely pre-tested?

No objections here. Looks like you aren't short by much by traditional rules of thumb, and I think the Bayesian tool would declare them NFS ready now.

I'm in the same boat - got a 14e/31-bit job for a SNFS 257 (yes that's a high difficulty for 14/31 but the yield is ~1.2) which has survived a full t55 plus a bit of t60. Bayesian methods declare it NFS ready and I feel confident there's no p51/2 waiting to fall out. Should I post the poly? Any objections?

There are a few more xyyx 14e jobs coming up but they won't be near NFS ready for 8-10 days.

VBCurtis · 2016-12-06, 20:24

I have a pair of SNFS candidates in my personal queue, just finishing ECM. They're difficulty 235-240; should I post them here?

If so, I am willing to do the linear alg myself.

pinhodecarlos · 2016-12-06, 20:38

No objections to Jon and Curtis. Then we need to give data server access to Curtis, request underway by email to Greg and cc to Jon.

Curtis, please post polys as examples on post 784 or send them to Jon (aka jyb).

Edit: Jon and Curtis please check your inbox.

2016-12-01, 15:36	#785
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 1917₁₆ Posts	C192_139_81 queued up on 15e It's a moderately large job - yield is ~1 at Q=2^28 so I've queued up half a billion Q, Murphy score for the SNFS polynomial is 1.875e-14, I suspect it'll take three weeks on a six-core machine for the linear algebra. To compare, C277_150_122 has Murphy 1.811e-14, and the very hard C272_136_105 had 6.387e-15; I think the Murphy scores are usually more predictive of post-processing difficulty than the SNFS size. Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-12-01 at 15:43

2016-12-02, 21:59	#786
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 110100111011₂ Posts	Another OPN completes ECM with no hits. Code: P55.73548_5M.C177 7354840357696348186997141461981606470291584313584199443^5-1

2016-12-04, 23:31	#787
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 3·1,129 Posts	Another OPN completes ECM. Code: P55.20308_5M.C184 2030891538065513233424079738501246933275925771141004667^5-1

2016-12-06, 18:12	#789
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 3·1,129 Posts	Another one just finished up. Code: P54.47461_5M.C186 474618153564570748818941261819047245816176402854534393^5-1 This is the last one for a while. Unless yoyo completes the four currently queued. I think only a couple of those are 14e eligible. I have 11 more working but it may be a week or so until they are ready.

2016-12-06, 20:38	#792
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 1001101010011₂ Posts	No objections to Jon and Curtis. Then we need to give data server access to Curtis, request underway by email to Greg and cc to Jon. Curtis, please post polys as examples on post 784 or send them to Jon (aka jyb). Edit: Jon and Curtis please check your inbox. Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2016-12-06 at 20:47

2016-12-06, 17:30	#788
jyb Aug 2005 Seattle, WA 3346₈ Posts	Without a fresh infusion of candidates, the 14e queue will run dry in the next day or two. I have four Homogeneous Cunninghams which can go, but they are a little light on ECM. They are all SNFS difficulty 243, and they've received about 4500 curves with B1 = 11e7, plus full runs at t50, t45, etc. Does anybody have any objections to adding these to the queue? Or alternatively, does anybody have any other candidates which are similarly appropriate for the queue and more completely pre-tested?

2016-12-06, 20:24	#791
VBCurtis "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 11404₈ Posts	I have a pair of SNFS candidates in my personal queue, just finishing ECM. They're difficulty 235-240; should I post them here? If so, I am willing to do the linear alg myself.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
System management notes	kriesel	kriesel	7	2020-10-21 18:52
Improving the queue management.	debrouxl	NFS@Home	10	2018-05-06 21:05
Script-based Primenet assignment management	ewmayer	Software	3	2017-05-25 04:02
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!)	jasong	jasong	35	2016-12-11 00:57
Power Management settings	PrimeCroat	Hardware	3	2004-02-17 19:11