Didn't even find a useless factor of an uninteresting number! Take that! - Page 25

storflyt32 · 2016-10-16, 10:20

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000877150418

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000877152045

Could someone perhaps give the first one a try?

If so, I could have the rest of it by and letting it go, it became a quite large one here.

Total factoring time = 75514.6610 seconds

I have not checked any further yet.

Thanks!

storflyt32 · 2016-10-23, 12:38

It became a PRP824 added to my list right now.

It will be uploaded together with the rest of it when the moment for this become the right one.

storflyt32 · 2016-10-30, 20:12

Back up again after having the computer fixed in my living room because of an undervolt problem.

Continuing with the upload of some factors, I came across something slightly better.

Returning back to the factorizations, I ended up with a P151 as the result.

Next, when testing from that 309 digit number, it has factor P1 = 2 in between, next a P157.

Doing it the opposite way, it once again has factor P1 = 2, next the P151.

Edit:

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000879523542

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000879523719

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000879523727

storflyt32 · 2016-10-31, 03:36

(3042376^32768+1)

Not prime (meaning composite).

storflyt32 · 2016-11-05, 04:40

Also two factors being noted down today with P3 = 349 in between today, both ways.

The larger factor was a P186, while the smaller was a P120, after checking.

Better continue with this until I have the final answer.

storflyt32 · 2016-11-05, 08:42

For dummies.

https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum...id=73788#73788

If it is still there.

You never know.

See you tomorrow.

Together with the rest of the numbers.

Hopefully not forgetting the smoking cigar or cigarette either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLFqeXm_5X4

Batalov · 2016-11-05, 21:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by storflyt32

For dummies.

https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum...id=73788#73788

If it is still there.

You never know....

The whole world is cruel and dumb.
And keeps telling you more or less the same thing:

Quote:

Originally Posted by https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum...id=66089#66089

Last warning.

Go follow:

Click image for larger version

Name: lord-mouth.jpg
Views: 103
Size: 20.3 KB
ID: 15103

Do you know why that is? "The whole world marches out of step" with you?

storflyt32 · 2016-11-07, 23:34

Came across this.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000881039353

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000881042866

Adding P8 = 23727779 and next the P12 at both places. The P14 was already known.

Here it factorizes into a P47 and a PRP122, next becoming a P122 when it comes to the second link.

It become that I ended up adding the flip-around in the second link first, but here I do not have the similar thing yet.

Manually trial dividing, it becomes the same P47 and next a P102 when it comes to the first link.

Total factoring time = 136928.3109 seconds

I guess it will be about the same factoring time here if next waiting for it to finish up.

I may add the P47 where it was found, but perhaps it should be better to wait for the first one there.

Always the flip-around.

storflyt32 · 2016-11-13, 04:45

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000715844422

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000633991051

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000664615087

At the end there.

I do not have the rest of it, by the way.

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000822445183

No problem here or with this one as well, because I guess it became known.

If you did not already know in the middle of the night.

Guess there could be a couple more of these as well.

The problem is that most of my 200+ digit factors and quite many of them still lies around here and my stuck hand or hands made doing this
a bit more difficult or problematic.

storflyt32 · 2016-11-16, 04:36

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000226834094

RSA-1024.

What if told you so?

Edit: Checking, it actually does not so this time either.

But only when multiplying each factor I got with each other.

When dividing both factors each way from RSA-1024, I get both factors when doing it each way.

So here not necessarily only Yafu's failure of dividing, but perhaps something else.

Getting back to it when I have it, because I am probably quite close.

The first and smallest factor ends with "7". The second factor ends with "9".

CRGreathouse · 2016-11-16, 06:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by storflyt32

RSA-1024.

What if told you so?

I don't think I'd believe it, given your track record so far.

Quote:

Originally Posted by storflyt32

Edit: Checking, it actually does not so this time either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by storflyt32

The first and smallest factor ends with "7". The second factor ends with "9".

If you know enough of the final digits of a factor, you can use Coppersmith's algorithm to find it.

2016-10-16, 10:20	#265
storflyt32 Feb 2013 458₁₀ Posts	http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000877150418 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000877152045 Could someone perhaps give the first one a try? If so, I could have the rest of it by and letting it go, it became a quite large one here. Total factoring time = 75514.6610 seconds I have not checked any further yet. Thanks! Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2016-10-16 at 10:29

2016-10-23, 12:38	#266
storflyt32 Feb 2013 111001010₂ Posts	It became a PRP824 added to my list right now. It will be uploaded together with the rest of it when the moment for this become the right one. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2016-10-23 at 12:39

2016-10-30, 20:12	#267
storflyt32 Feb 2013 2·229 Posts	Back up again after having the computer fixed in my living room because of an undervolt problem. Continuing with the upload of some factors, I came across something slightly better. Returning back to the factorizations, I ended up with a P151 as the result. Next, when testing from that 309 digit number, it has factor P1 = 2 in between, next a P157. Doing it the opposite way, it once again has factor P1 = 2, next the P151. Edit: http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000879523542 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000879523719 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000879523727 Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2016-10-30 at 20:21

2016-11-05, 08:42	#270
storflyt32 Feb 2013 2·229 Posts	For dummies. https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum...id=73788#73788 If it is still there. You never know. See you tomorrow. Together with the rest of the numbers. Hopefully not forgetting the smoking cigar or cigarette either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLFqeXm_5X4 Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2016-11-05 at 09:16

2016-11-07, 23:34	#272
storflyt32 Feb 2013 458₁₀ Posts	Came across this. http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000881039353 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000881042866 Adding P8 = 23727779 and next the P12 at both places. The P14 was already known. Here it factorizes into a P47 and a PRP122, next becoming a P122 when it comes to the second link. It become that I ended up adding the flip-around in the second link first, but here I do not have the similar thing yet. Manually trial dividing, it becomes the same P47 and next a P102 when it comes to the first link. Total factoring time = 136928.3109 seconds I guess it will be about the same factoring time here if next waiting for it to finish up. I may add the P47 where it was found, but perhaps it should be better to wait for the first one there. Always the flip-around. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2016-11-07 at 23:41

2016-10-31, 03:36	#268
storflyt32 Feb 2013 2×229 Posts	(3042376^32768+1) Not prime (meaning composite).

2016-11-05, 04:40	#269
storflyt32 Feb 2013 2·229 Posts	Also two factors being noted down today with P3 = 349 in between today, both ways. The larger factor was a P186, while the smaller was a P120, after checking. Better continue with this until I have the final answer.

2016-11-13, 04:45	#273
storflyt32 Feb 2013 1CA₁₆ Posts	http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000715844422 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000633991051 http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000664615087 At the end there. I do not have the rest of it, by the way. http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000822445183 No problem here or with this one as well, because I guess it became known. If you did not already know in the middle of the night. Guess there could be a couple more of these as well. The problem is that most of my 200+ digit factors and quite many of them still lies around here and my stuck hand or hands made doing this a bit more difficult or problematic. Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2016-11-13 at 04:58

2016-11-16, 04:36	#274
storflyt32 Feb 2013 2·229 Posts	http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000226834094 RSA-1024. What if told you so? Edit: Checking, it actually does not so this time either. But only when multiplying each factor I got with each other. When dividing both factors each way from RSA-1024, I get both factors when doing it each way. So here not necessarily only Yafu's failure of dividing, but perhaps something else. Getting back to it when I have it, because I am probably quite close. The first and smallest factor ends with "7". The second factor ends with "9". Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2016-11-16 at 04:54

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Can Pollard Rho cycles be used to find a factor?	wwf	Factoring	26	2013-09-30 04:24
PFGW can't find a small factor.	Arkadiusz	Software	7	2013-02-18 12:43
Chance to find an n-digit factor with ECM	RedGolpe	Factoring	4	2007-03-23 15:24
How much ECM does it take to find a given factor?	geoff	Factoring	5	2004-09-29 20:14
Where I find the best program to it factor keys? I use AMD.	chrow	Factoring	5	2004-02-19 10:15