![]() |
|
|
#133 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
To late to edit it...
I got it solved! Using "chmod +x" and then start Dash (not the bash) using the following command: Code:
./sr2sieve_x86_linux -i input.abcd -pmax 5e12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101000112 Posts |
MisterBitcoin,
Per your PM, I now have you reserved for only R523, R533, R548, R549, and S17. Please complete those to at least P=5T and post the files here before reserving any more work. Thanks. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | |
|
Jul 2003
10011000112 Posts |
Quote:
you could try to use the -t switch (works only with linux) an example to use 4 cpu cores: ./sr2sieve-x86_64-linux -f factors.txt -i xxx.abcd -P 5e12 -t4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
144810 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Jul 2003
13·47 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Jul 2003
13×47 Posts |
hi,
here is a sieve-file for R565 n= 100k to 200k sieved to 44T |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
28·19 Posts |
It's really close; -t 2 is within 5% of two single-threaded sieves, and -t 8 is <12% slower than 8 single-threaded sieves (that is, faster than 7 single-threaded instances). The code I have is limited to 8 or fewer threads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
Hi,
R548 is sieved to p=5T. (n=200K to 400K) Thanks to Lalera and Curtis for "-t". Running one program with all CPU´s seems to be faster than running six (in my case) different threads and bases. |
|
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101·103 Posts |
Quote:
As a general guideline on this project, n=25K-100K can be sieved to P=5T, 100K-200K to P=15T, and 200K-400K to P=25T. You can see some of the sieve depths that lalera sieved to in the first post of this thread. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2016-11-17 at 07:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
That shouldn´t be the biggest problem, my second server will be, hopefully, online in 24 hrs. (ty strato support...very slow atm).
It will take some days longer. ;) I´ll focus on sierp, starting with some 25K-100K and 100K-200K work, when the reserved work is done. My actual server has 6 v Cores and is from an good friend. (cheap. ;) I gonne set up an patreon account soon, more money=more servers. :)) I have planned 4 servers with 16 cores to add in 2016 (in total 200€/month), plus an Raspberry Pi Cluster. The cluster wont start before 06/2017, a lot of planning and money is needed. My mate is very busy, not sure if we can start the project...:/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany
811 Posts |
I got an idea, again. Not sure if it´s needed, but if someone needs inputs files for srsieve (>2 k´s left) try your luck on the github I created.
You simply download the file or copy the lines into a text-file. (You don´t need an account. ;)) Here is the link: https://github.com/AureliusB/CRUS_Sieve File is looking like: S/R (base)_(lowest n-value) |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sieving Drive all base 2/4 k's worked by CRUS | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 143 | 2014-10-21 23:55 |
| Some CRUS stats | vmod | Conjectures 'R Us | 213 | 2014-02-28 21:23 |
| What are your CRUS plans? | rogue | Conjectures 'R Us | 35 | 2013-11-09 09:03 |
| CRUS-like sieving challenge | CRGreathouse | Puzzles | 24 | 2011-10-28 18:30 |
| how high will CRUS go | Mini-Geek | Conjectures 'R Us | 1 | 2010-11-08 20:50 |