mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-09-11, 18:44   #2564
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23·3·5·72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
Why not edit it now? I vote for a temporary ban if he continues to use white text. Not acceptable.
Mainly because I was busy. Handing my dissertation in tomorrow. I may got back and edit that one when I have time.
henryzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 19:27   #2565
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

133708 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mshelikoff View Post
I'm still writing about this topic after I wrote "nevermind," so I apologize for writing "nevermind" because obviously I'm still thinking about it, and I'm fairly new to the forum and might be making a mistake by asking this question now. But...

What are the odds of this sequence meeting itself and creating a very large cycle if the sequence dips below a given number of digits (I'll use 7) and then terminates? Maybe it's an unlikely precondition before even considering the chances of the event if the precondition takes place. But I'm curious about it and wondering if I'm thinking about it the right way. I'm not talking about when a merger is found but how the final sequence at factordb will appear.

If the count of non-untouchable numbers above 10^7 with an immediate descendant below 10^7 were used as a denominator and the count of the subset of those numbers that belong to the 4788 genealogy were used as the numerator, would that fraction give a reasonable estimate of the odds?

I'm using the word "odds" as if this were a horse race instead of the given fixed probabilities in Raman's post, but that seems to be part of the appeal of following these things.
I think that this is an incredibly hard question to answer. I think that each number has a different number of numbers that can precede it. This implies to me that it is not a simple formula as 4788 has a certain subset of the numbers below 10^7. I think that working this out would be exceedingly difficult.
Working out all the numbers that can precede a number in a sequence is not easy.
henryzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 19:58   #2566
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

C5716 Posts
Default

In step 6295 it reached:
108779027694592579666495916767464 (33 digits)

and then it went up again. Now it is back to 88 digits in step 6666.
ATH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 20:08   #2567
ryanp
 
ryanp's Avatar
 
Jun 2012
Boulder, CO

172 Posts
Default

And now we're going down again, as of terms 6700 onward...
ryanp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 20:24   #2568
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

23×52×13 Posts
Default

got down as low s 18 digits, now it went up to 70 digits

Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2016-09-11 at 20:26
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 20:25   #2569
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

100000110000002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
i 7200-7300 it's hovering around 20-25 digits
and at 7581 it's back up to over 60. edit: and moving so fast I can't keep this up to date 7639 and 71 digits now edit2: changed already.

Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2016-09-11 at 20:27
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 20:26   #2570
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

13·199 Posts
Default

Minimum at 16 digits and now it grows with 2^2*7 driver.
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 20:30   #2571
mshelikoff
 
mshelikoff's Avatar
 
"Marc Shelikoff"
Dec 2014
Cambridge, MA

F16 Posts
Default

It looks like it picked up a 2^2·7 at the 16 digit 1987170707261684 , found the downdriver later, and then picked up another 2^2·7 at 20 digits and this one isn't leaving.
mshelikoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 20:30   #2572
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

50508 Posts
Default

This is almost heartbreaking.
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 21:27   #2573
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

2·7·677 Posts
Default

Just as heartbreaking as the previous bottom.
But then again look at AllSeq page - there are constantly 30-40 downdrivers but only 1 per few months terminations/merges...

Not all is lost just yet!
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-09-11, 21:37   #2574
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

1100010101112 Posts
Default

Minimum was step 7189:
1987170707261684 (16 digits)
ATH is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366 RichD Aliquot Sequences 470 2021-04-22 02:17
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3408 RichD Aliquot Sequences 474 2021-03-07 20:28
Reserved for MF - Sequence 276 kar_bon Aliquot Sequences 127 2020-12-17 10:05
Assignments are reserved but not showing up prism019 GPU to 72 6 2020-09-21 22:11
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved petrw1 Lone Mersenne Hunters 82 2010-01-11 01:57

All times are UTC. The time now is 12:37.


Sat Jul 17 12:37:10 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 10:24, 1 user, load averages: 1.80, 1.41, 1.32

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.