![]() |
|
|
#705 | |
|
Jun 2012
3,089 Posts |
Quote:
Does anyone have C202_123_83 reserved? If not I'll post a reservation in the other thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#706 |
|
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
176610 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#707 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
1010001000012 Posts |
Please queue c162 from 933436:i12559 to the 14e.
Code:
n: 795920047042543914656829537845200481309506505038518446055002165764050840398353508711177983426317295957924694485101194353630753839543880577771191450837035436488119 skew: 4276628.15 c0: -184620391078996498929537142306323507456 c1: 201753604300871811202196057593092 c2: 68344967267066717900756454 c3: -61879483896866674303 c4: -5440572254350 c5: 389400 Y0: -18284989545726808492563649765475 Y1: 257676068359981751 rlim: 43600000 alim: 43600000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#708 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
3·1,129 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#709 |
|
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
2×883 Posts |
As it happens it was queued with "lss: 0" which I assume is what you consider appropriate for a GNFS job. However, it's worth asking: Dmitry, did you do any test sieving, and if so, which side was better for special-Q, algebraic or rational?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#710 |
|
Jun 2012
3,089 Posts |
The following xyyx numbers have come out of yoyo after surviving t55. All are ready for sieving on the rational side. Polys attached.
C241_121_116 C224_122_99 C238_124_89 C231_124_91 C231_127_88 C243_130_83 All are of SNFS difficulty 245-250, all 31-bit jobs. I had figured them for the 14e queue, but subsequent review and retest sieving indicates all are likely better suited for 15e. The yields for all on 14e are <1.0 rel/Q. Or perhaps run them on 14e as 32-bit jobs? Is that a practical approach? I have used Yafu, snfspoly and hand calculations, as well as extensive test sieving, to determine and check these polynomials. My eye however is not what it should be, so I may have missed something obvious to others. A couple of these are quintics - I could not find sextics that were even close in performance. Some ugly number here... |
|
|
|
|
|
#711 |
|
Jun 2012
3,089 Posts |
C247_125_102 is finishing up ECM (t55). It's a borderline 14e/15e.
Code:
n: 1627563757155629890159556253861348470217382344829613295369475546727473839944027399400127177035550633727689091864096074845838696377726911641428847572327402308319640834340045892720262974991617331415048016481772354447711452052911372393187366678275891 # 125^102+102^125, difficulty: 253.08, anorm: 2.02e+037, rnorm: 1.03e+048 # scaled difficulty: 254.87, suggest sieving rational side # size = 1.288e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.431e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 253 skew: 2.1616 c6: 1 c0: 102 Y1: -444089209850062616169452667236328125 Y0: 1515666343897921428876285489468986728906752 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#712 |
|
Jun 2012
308910 Posts |
A few more xyyx candidates for 14e. All polys seem to be well behaved with good yields and speeds. Just trying to feed the grid.
C237_137_56 C223_136_94<---note: sieve on algebraic side C215_145_46 C200_133_65 C225_149_42 Code:
n: 301530556103252307549614934352787129673307391525971573447788714811273953985050554591734299589215581839191953873402267521635684573596541606002446769110510741083807768545242193262421389476157592585234133897108148306968364124992071965854709 # 137^56+56^137, difficulty: 241.85, anorm: 2.05e+039, rnorm: 3.60e+045 # scaled difficulty: 242.89, suggest sieving rational side # size = 3.610e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 3.131e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 241 skew: 5.0417 c6: 8 c0: 131383 Y1: -17001416405572203977 Y0: 8077828444807867164699107212814983364608 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Code:
n: 2068830899233676639832944145184044096406079304740801578064368787748498015453308467846362952511935162493189776145615257899194954627592946043595716284191190071102845329474924142950370461324865070269569959983838094963790710453 # 136^94+94^136, difficulty: 233.21, anorm: 3.20e+039, rnorm: 2.16e+044 # scaled difficulty: 233.21, suggest sieving algebraic side # size = 3.568e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 3.156e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 233 skew: 1.7683 c6: 289 c0: 8836 Y1: -816399326915508196549328896 Y0: 287243845682065590744605010781602099023 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Code:
n: 51949343999547029756605822451072445891110340436902689811366273044057181368925214803545903350770095659006340394776664770153687900310484588785235765324787959911626682865460988140280865748112875067853437525789192143321 # 145^46+46^145, difficulty: 241.10, anorm: 2.41e+031, rnorm: 1.01e+054 # scaled difficulty: 244.87, suggest sieving rational side # siever: 15 # size = 1.340e-016, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.701e-013, rroots = 1 type: snfs size: 241 skew: 2.7057 c5: 1 c0: 145 Y1: -28334269484119140625 Y0: 1659499472763109991171612967522797815962278035456 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Code:
n: 16190624160770231344504638076751280115254579497112564467354115051064153323320679250984983788780710168215437670922803142677428132081145225034520910004801225030029387271115467852109666745938754164282477 # 133^65+65^133, difficulty: 241.12, anorm: 1.86e+038, rnorm: -1.63e+046 # scaled difficulty: 242.44, suggest sieving rational side # size = 4.670e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 3.700e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 241 skew: 4.5303 c6: 1 c0: 8645 Y1: -7657620615851533663648054599761962890625 Y0: 230339304218442143770717 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Code:
n: 494010416212077574709558855717260257206587195081557420949812280973173126838197926652978645930663153358304237301128340103796339827891828996719733731202039750818482307360094629229204682111872891488673312662903112184977745500623 # 149^42+42^149, difficulty: 243.49, anorm: 1.30e+037, rnorm: 2.79e+046 # scaled difficulty: 245.04, suggest sieving rational side # size = 5.586e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 4.167e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 243 skew: 1.8644 c6: 1 c0: 42 Y1: -1630436461403549 Y0: 38126967124946768663101433365298971410432 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#713 |
|
Jun 2012
3,089 Posts |
Four more xyyx candidates coming out of ECM (t55) by yoyo. All are best sieved on the rational side. The first two listed are borderline 14e/15e, the second pair are almost certainly 15e.
Two candidates for 14e/15e: C249_125_106 C232_126_107 Code:
n: 145247875740210673019288827484052167445541695112293076354508907247441745759830025787482331899733867730252938472150443604614873800491298115409820267765132011008833636711063976881821981762526824218698282550846522841064441839805438072935467676117011139 # 125^106+106^125, difficulty: 256.39, anorm: 8.24e+037, rnorm: 1.63e+048 # scaled difficulty: 258.11, suggest sieving rational side # size = 1.073e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.251e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 256 skew: 1.0877 c6: 32 c0: 53 Y1: -11102230246251565404236316680908203125 Y0: 1699781800272807707897986281826313047113728 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Code:
n: 2887884444212159417484451416563223463940590134126168004586647514085637539224478341689850930050221157525576138337988534178438744496207163444059886895143961485721141270709867989065788570209629350576520930852028248609276141003325224407 # 126^107+107^126, difficulty: 256.85, anorm: 6.73e+037, rnorm: 3.58e+048 # scaled difficulty: 258.64, suggest sieving rational side # size = 9.897e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.169e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 256 skew: 2.239 c6: 1 c0: 126 Y1: 4140562374860211619063098135818149338786107 Y0: -64072225938746379480587511979135205376 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Two candidates for 15e: C239_127_92 C237_127_93 Code:
n: 44676261813276484410444766899960546478725170694498232168116132583277535544785923213465014071893339904788969639117075069394491590283776838312926293593932871997206006331751725866039542440260093259266956284427026551575288356564909254346636893 # 127^92+92^127, difficulty: 251.36, anorm: 2.44e+039, rnorm: 1.13e+047 # scaled difficulty: 252.64, suggest sieving rational side # size = 5.926e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 8.474e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 251 skew: 2.3658 c6: 92 c0: 16129 Y1: -36062498658084837781704007862143 Y0: 173597862829772829348420127559890912673792 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Code:
n: 288451229378380119245544897527252606344273691547704127599866473543417731508845800333629102892257698550879031154128093670778198504298435658862276631813318543332430030824128042042437317264798370108191094687001449675543365388458282655490687 # 127^93+93^127, difficulty: 251.97, anorm: 2.76e+040, rnorm: 9.47e+046 # scaled difficulty: 253.05, suggest sieving rational side # size = 3.566e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 5.905e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 251 skew: 5.2945 c6: 93 c0: 2048383 Y1: -36062498658084837781704007862143 Y0: 217842152506210285848936722357074971618093 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#714 | ||
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
64738 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
It seems the best way to handle this number is to sieve about half on each side at the lower special-q values. I didn't have any problems with sieving on my Linux box. I wonder if we should keep what we have and start a new run (at least some trial WUs) on the rational side. If nothing else, just to get this cleared off the queue. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#715 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
3×2,141 Posts |
The problem with that one was that jobs were mysteriously crashing on some Linux boxes; I couldn't replicate, but it was annoying the grid-master and so I paused the job. I'm almost tempted to finish it on my personal hardware, but it'd be a couple of months and I have a constant flood of aliquot-sequence numbers rolling by.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| System management notes | kriesel | kriesel | 7 | 2020-10-21 18:52 |
| Improving the queue management. | debrouxl | NFS@Home | 10 | 2018-05-06 21:05 |
| Script-based Primenet assignment management | ewmayer | Software | 3 | 2017-05-25 04:02 |
| Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!) | jasong | jasong | 35 | 2016-12-11 00:57 |
| Power Management settings | PrimeCroat | Hardware | 3 | 2004-02-17 19:11 |