![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·7·461 Posts |
This is on a new shiny GTX1080, running cuda-8.0-prerelease and Nvidia driver 367.35; I did
Code:
svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/cudalucas/code/trunk cudalucas-code cd cudalucas-code make Code:
pumpkin@pumpkin:~/cudalucas-build-cuda80/cudalucas-code$ ./CUDALucas -r 0 ------- DEVICE 0 ------- name GeForce GTX 1080 Compatibility 6.1 clockRate (MHz) 1733 memClockRate (MHz) 5005 totalGlobalMem 8504279040 totalConstMem 65536 l2CacheSize 2097152 sharedMemPerBlock 49152 regsPerBlock 65536 warpSize 32 memPitch 2147483647 maxThreadsPerBlock 1024 maxThreadsPerMP 2048 multiProcessorCount 20 maxThreadsDim[3] 1024,1024,64 maxGridSize[3] 2147483647,65535,65535 textureAlignment 512 deviceOverlap 1 Using threads: square 256, splice 128. Starting self test M86243 fft length = 4K Iteration 10000 / 86243, 0x0000000000000000, 4K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, error = 0.01408, real: 0:00, 0.0801 ms/iter Expected residue [23992ccd735a03d9] does not match actual residue [0000000000000000] Using threads: square 256, splice 128. Starting self test M132049 fft length = 8K Iteration 10000 / 132049, 0x0000000000000000, 8K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, error = 0.00079, real: 0:02, 0.1178 ms/iter Expected residue [4c52a92b54635f9e] does not match actual residue [0000000000000000] Using threads: square 256, splice 128. Starting self test M216091 fft length = 14K Iteration 10000 / 216091, 0x0000000000000000, 14K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, error = 0.00004, real: 0:01, 0.1285 ms/iter Expected residue [30247786758b8792] does not match actual residue [0000000000000000] Using threads: square 256, splice 128. Starting self test M756839 fft length = 42K Iteration 10000 / 756839, 0x0000000000000000, 42K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, error = 0.00000, real: 0:02, 0.1647 ms/iter Expected residue [5d2cbe7cb24a109a] does not match actual residue [0000000000000000] Code:
pumpkin@pumpkin:~/cudalucas-build-cuda80/cudalucas-code$ ldd ./CUDALucas linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffcd01d2000) libcufft.so.8.0 => /usr/local/cuda-8.0/lib64/libcufft.so.8.0 (0x00007f6f604d4000) libcudart.so.8.0 => /usr/local/cuda-8.0/lib64/libcudart.so.8.0 (0x00007f6f60273000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f6f5ff59000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f6f5fb94000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f6f5f990000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f6f5f771000) librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f6f5f569000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f6f5f265000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f6f5f04e000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000056154fda2000) Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-07-20 at 21:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"David"
Jul 2015
Ohio
11·47 Posts |
You need to rebuild with the compute version set correctly. 62 if I recall
This is in the Makefile Last fiddled with by airsquirrels on 2016-07-20 at 21:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×7×461 Posts |
Compute version 61 is apparently right; 62 gives all-zero residues again. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
281D16 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×7×461 Posts |
Quote:
The first DC I ran was successful. Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-07-24 at 08:51 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| quadratic residues | zippy | Math | 6 | 2015-07-20 13:09 |
| Fun with LL residues | NBtarheel_33 | Data | 19 | 2015-04-21 16:02 |
| residues and non residues of general quadratic congruences | smslca | Math | 0 | 2012-10-12 06:42 |
| weird residues | ATH | Data | 2 | 2012-08-14 02:25 |
| Fake Residues | jinydu | Lounge | 1 | 2008-09-16 17:02 |