![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Nov 2004
22×33×5 Posts |
Here's a quick comparison shot of the transit of Mercury this morning (my time) on the right compared to the transit of Venus (left) a few years ago. Same 6-inch telescope, just holding a cell phone camera up to the eyepiece. The size difference of the two planets is pretty dramatic, though its enhanced some by the difference in distance. (My sons did the Venus one; wish I could figure out how they got such good focus on their image....)
Norm |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3·17·97 Posts |
From Irthlingborough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Nov 2004
10348 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
23×1,223 Posts |
The Transit is a Ford product. The Mercury badge is all but retired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
1163910 Posts |
Thanks for the comparative pics -- must be an optical illusion (probably based on projected area biasing one's mental size-estimator), but Venus looks comparatively much larger than I expected based on its 2.5x larger diameter. Time to get my ruler out...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Nov 2004
22·33·5 Posts |
Yep- even realizing that Venus is 2.5 times larger than Mercury, and about twice as close during a transit, the difference in size between the two planets in these pictures was more than I expected.Time to calculate angular sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002
2·1,877 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2×5×312 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Thanks a billion for sharing it! |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| windows 10 , transit or not? | firejuggler | Lounge | 41 | 2015-08-17 09:09 |
| Live NASA Webcast of Venus Solar Transit | Dubslow | Lounge | 4 | 2012-06-13 19:28 |