![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Michael Kwok"
Mar 2006
22×5×59 Posts |
The poll for move 32 just closed, and the most popular move was Rxf7. Stockfish responded with 32...Nd3, and the FEN is:
r6k/1p3R1p/1p3p2/5N2/8/3n2P1/P1r4P/R5K1 w - - 1 33 Game so far: 1.e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 c5 4. Ngf3 Nf6 5. exd5 exd5 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7. Bxd7+ Nbxd7 8. O-O Be7 9. dxc5 Nxc5 10. Nb3 Nce4 11. Nfd4 O-O 12. Nf5 Re8 13. Nxe7+ Rxe7 14. f3 Nd6 15. Bg5 Nc4 16. Bxf6 gxf6 17. Qd4 Qb6 18. Qxb6 axb6 19. Rfd1 Re5 20. f4 Re2 21. Nd4 Re4 22. Nf5 Nxb2 23. Rxd5 Rxf4 24. g3 Rc4 25. Nh6+ Kg7 26. Nf5+ Kf8 27. Rd7 Rxc2 28. Nh6 Kg7 29. Nf5+ Kg6 30. Nh4+ Kg7 31. Nf5+ Kh8 32. Rxf7 Nd3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
20116 Posts |
33.Rxb7 If Ne5 then 34.Rf1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
Yes, I guess we intended 33.Rxb7 taking another pawn. But I'm wondering if we should fear the reply 33...Nf2. The threat is then 34...Nh3+, and if 35.Kh1 (if we want to go to f1 we have to safeguard our knight against ...Rf2+ first), we are in a mating net with Black's moves ...h5, ...Rd/e8 - d/e2 xh2.
If 33.Rxb7 Nf2 34.Kg2 Ng4+ 35.Kf3 (35.Kh3? h5 36.Rh1 Raxa2 is even worse) h5 with a dangerous attack on our king. If all that really is dangerous, maybe we ought to play 33.Rf1 now to prevent it. That does allow 33...Rcxa2 of course, but if all Black wants to do is take pawns then we should get a draw by clearing up Black's pawns too. Is 33.Rxb7 Nf2 a serious threat? Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2016-04-21 at 20:58 Reason: notation error |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
5·2,459 Posts |
Agreed. I feel like SF will respond with 33...Ne5 here effectively threating our h pawn with Nf3+. 34. Rf1 appears to be our best response although 34. h4 could be considered also.
Other reasonable responses for SF here would be 33...h5 or Rb2. I think that our response to either move would be 34. h4. On another note, I do not think that the swap with 33. Rxb7 Ne5 34. Rxb6 Nf3+ 35. Kf1 Nxh2+ 36. Nf3+ Kf1 would be good. We are likely to have difficulty protecting our a-pawn in the end game whereas black can easily guard his two pawns with his king and knight. We are better to swap off our a-pawn for his b-pawn at some point if it comes down to that. Quote:
33. Rxb7 Nf2 34. Rxb6 h5 35. a4 Nh3+ 36. Kh1 Rd8 37. Ne3 Re2 38. Nf1 -or- 36...Re8 37. Nd4 Rd2 38. Nf3 Re2 39. Rb5! (we are winning here) Either way we are up a pawn and any attempt by black to win is met with stiff defensive resistence and he will have some difficulty regaining the lost pawn. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2016-04-22 at 09:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
On reading your last post, Gary, I agree that a winning attack for Black after 33.Rxb7 Nf2 does not seem to be in evidence. I also feel that if we play 33.Rf1 then Black will capture our a pawn and retain one of its b pawns, which in itself gives Black serious winning prospects.
Therefore I agree with 33.Rxb7. For purposes of the poll, and possible further discussion, maybe 33.Rxf6 is an alternative. However I prefer 33.Rxb7 because I think the b pawns are most dangerous in an endgame and eliminating those is our best prospect of a draw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
33×19 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2·859 Posts |
Here is how I see the line going per above:
33. Rxb7 Ne5 34. Rf1 Ng4 35. h4 h5 36. a4 Rxa4 37. Rxb6 Ra8 38. Rb5 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
1229510 Posts |
Quote:
It is bad for us because if both sides did move as you suggested through our move 37 then black has a better move 37...Raa2. Here black's doubled rooks on our second rank gives him winning chances. Since SF would likely dismiss 34...Ng4 due to its badly placed knight after 35. h3, I think that the following is a more likely line: 33. Rxb7 Ne5 34. Rf1 h5 35. Nd4 Rc4 (or Rd2) 36. Nb3 Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2016-04-23 at 07:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
33·19 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish-assisted game vs Stockfish, move 8 discussion | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 11 | 2016-10-21 15:47 |
| Move 30 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 2 | 2016-04-03 19:55 |
| Move 28 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 8 | 2016-03-30 12:24 |
| Move 29 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 8 | 2016-03-29 10:27 |
| Move 5 discussion: Everyone vs stockfish | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2015-11-13 13:39 |