Strategic Double Clicking - Page 89

Madpoo · 2016-04-17, 03:38

Here's an updated list. 3:1 or worse bad-to-good.

You'll note a lot of these are the larger exponents (mostly from that bad system I've been chipping away at to corroborate the trend). I guess it should be suspicious when someone turns in as many as 40 LL results in that 70-80M range in a single month... they were probably overclocking too the extreme and thus ran way over the redline. Some months were definitely better than others.

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
39721681	3	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=39721681,71,1
39726443	3	0	4	0	3	1	DoubleCheck=39726443,71,1
70373707	3	0	0	2	2	0	DoubleCheck=70373707,75,1
70410673	3	0	0	2	2	0	DoubleCheck=70410673,75,1
72301507	4	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=72301507,75,1
73546027	4	1	12	0	12	0	DoubleCheck=73546027,75,1
73612841	3	0	9	0	9	0	DoubleCheck=73612841,74,1
73613261	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73613261,74,1
73613279	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73613279,74,1
73613453	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73613453,74,1
73613669	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73613669,74,1
73614041	3	0	9	0	9	0	DoubleCheck=73614041,74,1
73614077	3	0	9	0	9	0	DoubleCheck=73614077,74,1
73614589	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73614589,74,1
73615211	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73615211,74,1
73615261	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73615261,74,1
73618801	3	0	22	0	22	0	DoubleCheck=73618801,74,1
73619087	3	0	9	0	9	0	DoubleCheck=73619087,74,1
73643701	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73643701,74,1
73645031	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73645031,75,1
73645051	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73645051,74,1
73646059	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646059,74,1
73646107	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646107,75,1
73646141	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646141,75,1
73646491	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646491,75,1
73646501	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646501,75,1
73646801	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646801,74,1
73646857	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646857,75,1
73646861	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73646861,75,1
73685083	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73685083,75,1
73685099	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=73685099,75,1
73801619	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73801619,74,1
73802039	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73802039,74,1
73802059	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73802059,74,1
73802803	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73802803,74,1
73802809	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73802809,74,1
73802903	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73802903,74,1
73802987	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73802987,74,1
73804903	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73804903,74,1
73806097	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73806097,75,1
73806199	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73806199,74,1
73809013	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73809013,74,1
73809097	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73809097,74,1
73811047	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73811047,75,1
73812071	7	0	32	0	32	0	DoubleCheck=73812071,75,1
78012091	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78012091,74,1
78031027	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78031027,75,1
78119023	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78119023,75,1
78119059	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78119059,75,1
78121013	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78121013,75,1
78121049	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78121049,75,1
78143071	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=78143071,75,1
78171013	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78171013,75,1
78171031	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78171031,75,1
78205999	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78205999,74,1
78206027	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78206027,74,1
78206041	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78206041,75,1
78206047	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78206047,75,1
78206059	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78206059,75,1
78226081	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78226081,74,1
78331013	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78331013,75,1
78331051	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78331051,75,1
78331063	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78331063,75,1
78331111	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78331111,75,1
78333091	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78333091,75,1
78338011	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78338011,74,1
78347809	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78347809,74,1
78409057	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=78409057,75,1
78409061	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=78409061,75,1
78409361	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=78409361,75,1
78483023	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78483023,75,1

Mark Rose · 2016-04-17, 06:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's an updated list. 3:1 or worse bad-to-good.

You'll note a lot of these are the larger exponents (mostly from that bad system I've been chipping away at to corroborate the trend). I guess it should be suspicious when someone turns in as many as 40 LL results in that 70-80M range in a single month... they were probably overclocking too the extreme and thus ran way over the redline. Some months were definitely better than others.

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
39721681	3	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=39721681,71,1
39726443	3	0	4	0	3	1	DoubleCheck=39726443,71,1

I grabbed these two.

Has anything interesting come from the mandatory DC work change, by the way?

endless mike · 2016-04-17, 23:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by endless mike

Taking the above 15

Finished. Eleven out of fifteen needing triple check, not too bad.

Code:

38620357	Needed triple check, triple check confirmed
38636827	Needs triple check, assigned
38816809	Needs triple check
39093833	Verified
39138989	Needs triple check
39158261	Needed triple check, self verified, quad check confirmed
39258337	Verified
39285943	Needs triple check
39428419	Verified
45364643	Verified
46172479	Needs triple check
46175693	Needs triple check
46742713	Needs triple check
46964263	Needs triple check
47035271	Needs triple check

petrw1 · 2016-04-18, 03:31

Code:

78409057	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=78409057,75,1
78409061	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=78409061,75,1
78409361	6	1	24	0	24	0	DoubleCheck=78409361,75,1
78483023	6	1	27	0	27	0	DoubleCheck=78483023,75,1

Mark Rose · 2016-04-18, 05:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by endless mike

Finished. Eleven out of fifteen needing triple check, not too bad.

Code:

38620357	Needed triple check, triple check confirmed
38636827	Needs triple check, assigned
38816809	Needs triple check
39093833	Verified
39138989	Needs triple check
39158261	Needed triple check, self verified, quad check confirmed
39258337	Verified
39285943	Needs triple check
39428419	Verified
45364643	Verified
46172479	Needs triple check
46175693	Needs triple check
46742713	Needs triple check
46964263	Needs triple check
47035271	Needs triple check

I've queued all of the above needing another check and not assigned.

lycorn · 2016-04-18, 07:24

@MarkRose,
Just out of curiosity, why have you recently done so many LL tests on small (3M) exponents?
They were already TCed/QCed, Any sort of QA run?

Mark Rose · 2016-04-18, 11:23

Just for fun. Every result was a triple check if disregarding self-verified results. Every exponent between 3000K and 3010K is now triple checked.

I'm surprised anyone noticed.

lycorn · 2016-04-18, 14:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I'm surprised anyone noticed.

Very often reality surpasses fiction

Madpoo · 2016-04-18, 15:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

Just for fun. Every result was a triple check if disregarding self-verified results. Every exponent between 3000K and 3010K is now triple checked.

I'm surprised anyone noticed.

I'd been tempted to carry on some of my (I'm sure useless) triple checks of the smaller exponents too... I think I got up to everything < 2M before I moved on to looking at the bad computers, and then that caught my eye as a fun project.

The small exponent triple-checking was mostly just me confirming old code... yeah, they'd been double-checked, but what if, just on some extreme chance, some bug in an old app caused it to spit out some weird (but same) residue each time? Long shot, and until you look, you don't know what you'll find.

Mark Rose · 2016-04-18, 17:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

I'd been tempted to carry on some of my (I'm sure useless) triple checks of the smaller exponents too... I think I got up to everything < 2M before I moved on to looking at the bad computers, and then that caught my eye as a fun project.

The small exponent triple-checking was mostly just me confirming old code... yeah, they'd been double-checked, but what if, just on some extreme chance, some bug in an old app caused it to spit out some weird (but same) residue each time? Long shot, and until you look, you don't know what you'll find.

I thought of continuing all the triple checks up to 3M-4M. I could probably do it in about two months.

chalsall · 2016-04-18, 17:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I thought of continuing all the triple checks up to 3M-4M. I could probably do it in about two months.

The point being?

2016-04-18, 03:31	#972
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 2×5×7×67 Posts	Took the last 4 Code: 78409057 6 1 24 0 24 0 DoubleCheck=78409057,75,1 78409061 6 1 24 0 24 0 DoubleCheck=78409061,75,1 78409361 6 1 24 0 24 0 DoubleCheck=78409361,75,1 78483023 6 1 27 0 27 0 DoubleCheck=78483023,75,1

2016-04-18, 07:24	#974
lycorn "GIMFS" Sep 2002 Oeiras, Portugal 3·491 Posts	@MarkRose, Just out of curiosity, why have you recently done so many LL tests on small (3M) exponents? They were already TCed/QCed, Any sort of QA run? Last fiddled with by lycorn on 2016-04-18 at 07:24

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic	Mysticial	Software	52	2021-04-23 06:51
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page	marigonzes	Information & Answers	2	2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th?	jasong	jasong	7	2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1?	137ben	PrimeNet	6	2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume.	Uncwilly	Puzzles	8	2006-07-03 16:02

2016-04-18, 11:23	#975
Mark Rose "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 5562₈ Posts	Just for fun. Every result was a triple check if disregarding self-verified results. Every exponent between 3000K and 3010K is now triple checked. I'm surprised anyone noticed.