RIP DCTF. - Page 33

chalsall · 2016-03-07, 20:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

14 estimated days to completion (I had to guess...GPU72 says none)

Monst has a few, and Anonymous has a few more.

Yeah, two weeks out seems reasonable.

Look forward to putting this to bed.

chalsall · 2016-03-18, 23:01

Just so everyone knows, AnonUser has just submitted the last batch of DCTF work!

Thanks for all the cycles everyone. This was a multi-year effort by many, many people!

manfred4 · 2016-03-18, 23:08

And that user switched back to his previous TF work to bring 875M to 80 bits, he reported the next 7 factors in that range again. here.

Too sad he doesn't continue with the work valueable for the upcoming future.

Uncwilly · 2016-03-18, 23:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by manfred4

Too sad he doesn't continue with the work valueable for the upcoming future.

Like helping to take all of the first 4000 exponents in the 100M digit range up to a suitable level.

Mark Rose · 2016-03-19, 02:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by manfred4

And that user switched back to his previous TF work to bring 875M to 80 bits, he reported the next 7 factors in that range again. here.

That range is so arbitrary. I wonder what the reason could be.

airsquirrels · 2016-03-20, 01:22

I am very glad DCTF is done. If I could only get consistent temperatures in Ohio I would be contributing a lot more to LLTF, or maybe 100M.

Right now I've actually been spending some effort just-in-time factoring my own 100M candidates...

At least Anonymous is still contributing to the project :)

chalsall · 2016-03-20, 18:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by airsquirrels

If I could only get consistent temperatures in Ohio I would be contributing a lot more to LLTF, or maybe 100M.

Damn that climate change!!!

lycorn · 2016-03-20, 18:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Like helping to take all of the first 4000 exponents in the 100M digit range up to a suitable level.

Or help clearing the remaining few @ 62 & 63 bits in the 0 - 1 M range...

Mark Rose · 2016-03-20, 21:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycorn

Or help clearing the remaining few @ 62 & 63 bits in the 0 - 1 M range...

Those are all between 0 and 100 k, outside of the GPU range.

lycorn · 2016-03-21, 13:11

Depends on the mfaktc version you use. Older versions can go down to to 2K.
Not very efficient, but still way more efficient than CPU TFing.

As John Lennon would say: "you may say I´m a lunatic, but I´m not the only one..."

petrw1 · 2016-03-21, 15:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycorn

Depends on the mfaktc version you use. Older versions can go down to to 2K.
Not very efficient, but still way more efficient than CPU TFing.

As John Lennon would say: "you may say I´m a lunatic, but I´m not the only one..."

And Billy Joel:

Quote:

You may be right
I may be crazy
But it just may be a lunatic you're looking for

2016-03-18, 23:01	#354
chalsall If I May "Chris Halsall" Sep 2002 Barbados 2·5·7·139 Posts	DCTF is finally "pining for the fjords"... Just so everyone knows, AnonUser has just submitted the last batch of DCTF work! Thanks for all the cycles everyone. This was a multi-year effort by many, many people!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Getting unneed DCTF work	Mark Rose	GPU to 72	4	2018-01-01 06:14

2016-03-18, 23:08	#355
manfred4 Mar 2014 Germany 1111000₂ Posts	And that user switched back to his previous TF work to bring 875M to 80 bits, he reported the next 7 factors in that range again. here. Too sad he doesn't continue with the work valueable for the upcoming future.

2016-03-20, 01:22	#358
airsquirrels "David" Jul 2015 Ohio 11×47 Posts	I am very glad DCTF is done. If I could only get consistent temperatures in Ohio I would be contributing a lot more to LLTF, or maybe 100M. Right now I've actually been spending some effort just-in-time factoring my own 100M candidates... At least Anonymous is still contributing to the project :)

2016-03-21, 13:11	#362
lycorn Sep 2002 Oeiras, Portugal 2⁶·23 Posts	Depends on the mfaktc version you use. Older versions can go down to to 2K. Not very efficient, but still way more efficient than CPU TFing. As John Lennon would say: "you may say I´m a lunatic, but I´m not the only one..."