mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Other Stuff > Forum Feedback

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-03-11, 06:14   #34
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

25·257 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Sure, it will have to guess which part to factorize in primes, and which part to let unfactored to look nice (i.e. do not factor 1234 into 2*617, because it looks more nicer when written 1234, you know, consecutive numbers... blah blah...)
Ha! Good catch!

Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-11, 06:30   #35
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

1C3516 Posts
Default

Since when does \(\infty\) factor as 34*79? Or any factors at all, for that matter.

Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2016-03-11 at 06:31
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-11, 07:07   #36
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

22×33×89 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
Since when does \(\infty\) factor as 34*79? Or any factors at all, for that matter.
Now we know that in spite of the boasting that \(\infty\) sign, he actually doesn't post too much...

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2016-03-11 at 07:11
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-11, 07:53   #37
0PolarBearsHere
 
0PolarBearsHere's Avatar
 
Oct 2015

2×7×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
Since when does \(\infty\) factor as 34*79? Or any factors at all, for that matter.
Which one of the many \(\infty\)s are we talking about here?

Last fiddled with by 0PolarBearsHere on 2016-03-11 at 07:54
0PolarBearsHere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-11, 08:18   #38
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3×29×83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 0PolarBearsHere View Post
Which one of the many \(\infty\)s are we talking about here?
Presumably \(\aleph_0\).
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-12, 02:51   #39
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

22·1,549 Posts
Default

The factored post counts is awesome

Now we need to take it to the next level: Factor everything. Every number in every place.

Reply counts
View counts
Post number
All of the numbers listed in the "千里之行始於足下" section
Post dates: day of the month, month of the year, the year
Post times: hour, month and second
And whatever else I missed
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-12, 03:53   #40
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

100101100011002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
And whatever else I missed
This you missed:
Click image for larger version

Name:	pages.PNG
Views:	124
Size:	1.6 KB
ID:	14031
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-12, 04:42   #41
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

25·257 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
All of the numbers listed in the "千里之行始於足下" section
We tried to factor the numbers in this section. They are supposed to be global variables that we can use the PHP plugin system to manipulate, but we cannot find the "trigger" event that enables this feature. The menu in the editor has hundreds of triggers that apply to various pages and actions. It took a lot of testing to find the triggers for the nav bar, footer and individual post thingie. Anyways, if we could find the right trigger most of those numbers would be trivial to do.

When you think about it, there is a lot of CPU cycles going on to render a thread. Every post gets the post number factored even if the same person posts multiple times on the page. We use the 97 post view to read so that is a lot! BTW, there is an obscure way to know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that each post sidebar element (?) is rendered individually. We don't think anyone will find the evidence but you never know. It might be in an obscure place but it is glaringly obvious once you see it.

Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-12, 05:36   #42
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

25×257 Posts
Default

The length, in characters, of the factored post counts worried us a little.

Because there are no spaces in the string of text, the page rendering thingy will enlargen the post sidebar element (?) to fit, which we think looks less-than-elegant.

Anyways, assuming we programmed our tester correctly, the longest possible factored post count:

Code:
<= 10,000 is:
    12 digits long:
        8580 = "22*3*5*11*13"
Code:
<= 100,000 is:
    14 digits long:
        98670 = "2*3*5*11*13*23"
        97812 = "22*32*11*13*19"
        92820 = "22*3*5*7*13*17"
        90090 = "2*32*5*7*11*13"
        87780 = "22*3*5*7*11*19"
        87516 = "22*32*11*13*17"
        81510 = "2*3*5*11*13*19"
        78540 = "22*3*5*7*11*17"
        72930 = "2*3*5*11*13*17"
        60060 = "22*3*5*7*11*13"
Note that superscripted numbers are listed like regular numbers. This made our testing program simpler.

We should have the results for <= 1,000,000 sometime tomorrow.

Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-12, 05:48   #43
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

9,787 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
Now we need to take it to the next level: Factor everything. Every number in every place.

And whatever else I missed
All numbers within text:
Please give your attention for a brief showing of how Xyzzy's spawn ate some cinnamon in an asinine way.
Would become:
Please give your a2*5tion 2*2 a brief showing of how Xyzzy's spawn 23 some cinnamon in an asi3*3 way.
Thank you Victor Borge
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-03-12, 05:52   #44
snme2pm1
 
"Graham uses ISO 8601"
Mar 2014
AU, Sydney

35 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xyzzy View Post
It would be an option.

http://php.net/manual/en/function.date.php

Date formats are a very volatile subject here, for some reason. You would need to get a lot of members to agree with the change. Any time we mess with the format even the littlest bit everyone goes bananas. (Maybe make a poll?)
I submit that a poll to more closely embrace ISO 8601 is redundant.
There are times (particularly after sufficient procrastination) when a change becomes a no-brainer.
Note that there was no dissent to such measures at mersenne.org many months ago.
Further note that there was no dissent to such measures being more stringently applied at mersenne.ca recently.
Consider http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=20678&page=5 onward.

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
Actually I think this is one of the easier ones. yyyy-mm-dd date format is the only logical math-y forum-approved date-format. A poll should show the clear consensus on this one
Yes agreed.

I reckon the question is that if anbody has reason to object and makes a reasonable case here then they have liberty to do so.
But otherwise, without any upheld widely supported concerns then outcome should be clear.

Edit: Evidently the site distinguishes between visitors and authenticated members, so any new arrangements for visitors would be low impact in the first instance.

Last fiddled with by snme2pm1 on 2016-03-12 at 05:57 Reason: Especially default arrangements
snme2pm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Collaboration Requests robert44444uk Prime Gap Searches 2 2017-01-17 07:57
Requests for change... WraithX FactorDB 32 2014-12-18 03:40
Manual Requests tului GPU Computing 15 2014-06-24 06:22
a few simple requests for v5 ixfd64 PrimeNet 44 2010-01-11 20:21
New Year requests masser Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 22 2007-09-24 21:05

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:34.


Sat Jul 17 13:34:20 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 11:21, 1 user, load averages: 1.63, 1.64, 1.60

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.