Requests? - Page 2

Xyzzy · 2016-03-04, 02:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by axn

For numbers smaller than 10000, trial division is an entirely acceptable method of factoring. Are you saying you don't know how to do trial division in PHP?

Our thinking was that we would call an external program to do the work. We never considered using PHP itself. Now we have something new to think about.

ewmayer · 2016-03-04, 03:47

is

[= beside himself] to see the new

razzie up and running. Now go away, or ah shall haff to taunt you a second time.

Xyzzy · 2016-03-04, 06:07

A very ugly start:

Code:

Output:

0PolarBearsHere · 2016-03-04, 07:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgbeuning

Some threads get very long. If someone points me to a thread with 200 pages
I am not even going to try to find the interesting parts.

What if each thread had a shared posting all pages of the thread displayed.
The originator of the thread could put conclusions in the shared posting.
For some threads, like "strategic double checks" the shared page could
remind people to reserve the exponents they should work on. For the
benchmark thread, the shared post could give the rules for the thread.

Do you mean something like Thread tools -> Print mode -> view all pages

or a thread level sticky post, in the same way that there are forum level sticky threads?

science_man_88 · 2016-03-04, 12:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgbeuning

Some threads get very long. If someone points me to a thread with 200 pages
I am not even going to try to find the interesting parts.

What if each thread had a shared posting all pages of the thread displayed.
The originator of the thread could put conclusions in the shared posting.
For some threads, like "strategic double checks" the shared page could
remind people to reserve the exponents they should work on. For the
benchmark thread, the shared post could give the rules for the thread.

did you try changing your setting to 97 per page that takes the PARI command thread down to around 27 pages for example. it's because the default is 11 per page I think so anything can take a lot of pages even the ho-pourri thread is around 30 right now I think at forum default. it's only 4 at 97 per page.

axn · 2016-03-04, 13:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xyzzy

A very ugly start:

Two comments.
1. Use a string to concatenate the factors directly, instead of dumping into an array.
2. Change the main loop condition to while ($i*$i <= $x). EDIT:- However, with this change, you have to add $x also as a factor (if > 1).

bgbeuning · 2016-03-05, 02:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by 0PolarBearsHere

or a thread level sticky post, in the same way that there are forum level sticky threads?

This sounds like what I was suggesting.

Some text (post) that is displayed at the top of all pages of a thread that can
be filled in by someone (thread originator) to hold text everyone reading the thread
might want to know.

LaurV · 2016-03-05, 03:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgbeuning

This sounds like what I was suggesting.

Some text (post) that is displayed at the top of all pages of a thread that can
be filled in by someone (thread originator) to hold text everyone reading the thread
might want to know and to which the supermods may change the title and context to whatever they feel it's funny, whenever they want, and how many times per day they go to the coffee machine to refill their cup.

Fixed that for you.

bgbeuning · 2016-03-05, 15:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

Fixed that for you.

Much better.

Xyzzy · 2016-03-10, 18:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by axn

1. Use a string to concatenate the factors directly, instead of dumping into an array.

That made things a lot simpler!

We have the code live now.

The only broken part right now, that we know of, is that the post count in private messages is "1". We think this is because we do not have the right "trigger" defined for that template.

Lines 4-6 "fix" the untriggered private message issue. We use silly variable names to avoid collision with variable names that may or may not exist. The speed "hit" appears to be negligible.

Please look for any other broken areas of the forum.

Xyzzy · 2016-03-10, 18:23

Someday, we would like to format the post count like this:

2 * 3³ * 1234

That will require a new approach to our code.

We would also like to substitute "×" for "*". And maybe add commas to parts that are more than three digits.

So:

2 × 3³ × 1,234

For now we are happy with the results.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Collaboration Requests	robert44444uk	Prime Gap Searches	2	2017-01-17 07:57
Requests for change...	WraithX	FactorDB	32	2014-12-18 03:40
Manual Requests	tului	GPU Computing	15	2014-06-24 06:22
a few simple requests for v5	ixfd64	PrimeNet	44	2010-01-11 20:21
New Year requests	masser	Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5	22	2007-09-24 21:05

2016-03-04, 03:47	#13
ewmayer ∂²ω=0 Sep 2002 República de California 10110101110111₂ Posts	is [= beside himself] to see the new razzie up and running. Now go away, or ah shall haff to taunt you a second time.

2016-03-04, 06:07	#14
Xyzzy "Mike" Aug 2002 2⁵·257 Posts	A very ugly start: Code: Output:

2016-03-10, 18:23	#22
Xyzzy "Mike" Aug 2002 2⁵·257 Posts	Someday, we would like to format the post count like this: 2 * 3³ * 1234 That will require a new approach to our code. We would also like to substitute "×" for "*". And maybe add commas to parts that are more than three digits. So: 2 × 3³ × 1,234 For now we are happy with the results.