![]() |
|
|
#331 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
976710 Posts |
I've asked before if people want to take the 2,273 DC candidates in 62M from 73 to 74, but I didn't really get an answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#332 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2·3·1,609 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#333 |
|
"David"
Jul 2015
Ohio
11×47 Posts |
I'll help do them, I was only trying to get LLTF a nice lead in all categories first. If we are going to haggle over whether DCTF is done till they are complete though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#334 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Congratulations everyone!
The last of all DC candidates below 60M have now been appropriate Trial Factored! For a side project of a side project which was expected to take ten years or so, this has been finished in a remarkable quick amount of time, particularly considering the factoring depth has increased twice since we began. As requested, I am currently bringing in the 2,279 candidates at 73 bits in the 62M range for those interested in taking them up to 74. I would ask, however, that people not move too much firepower from LLTF to do this work. We are still quite tight in the LL Cat 4 range, and feeding the LL P-1'ers. It is also going to be something like eight years before candidates in the 62M range will be assigned for DC'ing (heck, we just finished the LL'ing there). Anyway, as always, thanks for all the cycles everyone!!! Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2016-02-20 at 17:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#335 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
So, some were interested in additional DCTF...
![]() Just in case there are any others who really just _need_ to do additional DCTF (for whatever reason; no judgement... your kit), I've brought in an additional 1,000 candidates in 61M. I'll keep filling this range as these are consumed. Also, a note to those using MISFIT... A few are still using the DCTF request parameter. Thus, you'll be given 61M to 74 work. If you don't want to do this, please change your settings to LLTF (where "to 72 bits" is still on sale! ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336 |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
2·5·293 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#337 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
Sigh... OK, I'm now going to bring in a few more thousand candidates just to satiate the appetite. Hopefully they don't all get assigned overnight.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#338 | |
|
"David"
Jul 2015
Ohio
11×47 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#339 |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
293010 Posts |
Darn it, I might have to stop LLTF for a bit to keep ahead of LaurV hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#340 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
![]() You guys do whatever you want to keep your respective rankings. And the additional DCTF /does/ make sense (for some cards) at the moment. The DCTF work done in the near future will be valuable. In about eight years.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#341 | |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
2·5·293 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Getting unneed DCTF work | Mark Rose | GPU to 72 | 4 | 2018-01-01 06:14 |