Strategic Double Clicking - Page 77

0PolarBearsHere · 2016-02-11, 07:26

Based on the mersenne.ca report it looks like the 770 LLs best at 55M, so I'm happy to take a half dozen of the 55M range to start off with (machine only runs in the evenings).
Actually, give me a couple of the 37M ones too, that I can run first to check.

manfred4 · 2016-02-11, 10:01

Hey Madpoo, I would like to have some of those triple checks as well - I started with two successfull DCs on my 670 and switched to first time LLs, but I think helping you here would make you happy as well and I will check the capabilities of my GPU further.
I will leave this machine running without supervision for some time, so could you please give me about 35 of the smallest available tests? Results may be coming in sporadically.

fivemack · 2016-02-11, 10:43

I guess it's not worth individually requesting TCs - the mismatches go in the databases and the TCs will get scheduled the next time madpoo does a run - but I have a mismatch for 50015437.

dragonbud20 · 2016-02-11, 15:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by fivemack

I guess it's not worth individually requesting TCs - the mismatches go in the databases and the TCs will get scheduled the next time madpoo does a run - but I have a mismatch for 50015437.

got it. ETA: 5 days

cuBerBruce · 2016-02-11, 16:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Code:

Exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
45422269	1	0	3	1	3	1	DoubleCheck=45422269,72,1

I got a mismatch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
49812869	2	0	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=49812869,72,1
50145749	2	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=50145749,73,1

I got a mismatch on 49812869, but matched on 50145749.

Madpoo · 2016-02-12, 05:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by 0PolarBearsHere

Based on the mersenne.ca report it looks like the 770 LLs best at 55M, so I'm happy to take a half dozen of the 55M range to start off with (machine only runs in the evenings).
Actually, give me a couple of the 37M ones too, that I can run first to check.

Here you go. I picked triple-checks where neither of the first two systems have enough track record to know if they're good or bad. The outcome of these TC's will (hopefully) declare the winner and bump someone further into bad territory.

Code:

exponent	worktodo
55110421	DoubleCheck=55110421,73,1
55112119	DoubleCheck=55112119,73,1
55137587	DoubleCheck=55137587,73,1
55197383	DoubleCheck=55197383,73,1
55203487	DoubleCheck=55203487,73,1
55235711	DoubleCheck=55235711,74,1

Madpoo · 2016-02-12, 05:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by manfred4

Hey Madpoo, I would like to have some of those triple checks as well - I started with two successfull DCs on my 670 and switched to first time LLs, but I think helping you here would make you happy as well and I will check the capabilities of my GPU further.
I will leave this machine running without supervision for some time, so could you please give me about 35 of the smallest available tests? Results may be coming in sporadically.

The smallest ones are in the 37M range and then into the 38M range.

As with the ones I just picked out for 0PolarBearsHere, the outcome of this triple-check should bump one of the other machines further into "bad" territory (that's why they're not all 37M, because in many of those I guess I'm better able to predict the winner):

Code:

37000979	DoubleCheck=37000979,71,1
37041383	DoubleCheck=37041383,71,1
37049641	DoubleCheck=37049641,71,1
37082791	DoubleCheck=37082791,71,1
37093547	DoubleCheck=37093547,71,1
37137127	DoubleCheck=37137127,71,1
37536589	DoubleCheck=37536589,71,1
37723177	DoubleCheck=37723177,71,1
37824119	DoubleCheck=37824119,71,1
37938911	DoubleCheck=37938911,71,1
38019811	DoubleCheck=38019811,71,1
38117503	DoubleCheck=38117503,71,1
38140309	DoubleCheck=38140309,71,1
38146897	DoubleCheck=38146897,71,1
38160509	DoubleCheck=38160509,71,1
38208473	DoubleCheck=38208473,71,1
38238749	DoubleCheck=38238749,71,1
38276437	DoubleCheck=38276437,71,1
38280547	DoubleCheck=38280547,71,1
38352581	DoubleCheck=38352581,71,1
38386063	DoubleCheck=38386063,71,1
38433071	DoubleCheck=38433071,71,1
38439551	DoubleCheck=38439551,71,1
38441353	DoubleCheck=38441353,71,1
38468119	DoubleCheck=38468119,71,1
38469763	DoubleCheck=38469763,71,1
38494051	DoubleCheck=38494051,71,1
38499931	DoubleCheck=38499931,71,1
38555171	DoubleCheck=38555171,71,1
38583751	DoubleCheck=38583751,71,1
38600299	DoubleCheck=38600299,71,1
38600339	DoubleCheck=38600339,71,1
38600459	DoubleCheck=38600459,71,1
38600473	DoubleCheck=38600473,71,1
38613037	DoubleCheck=38613037,71,1

Make sure they're still available and try to get them assigned by stuffing them into a Prime95 worktodo first.

All but a few of these 37M/38M are well into cat 2 territory (with a few in the upper cat 1). The ones I picked for 0PolarBearsHere are way past cat 4 so he could actually reserve those on the manual page if he likes.

Madpoo · 2016-02-12, 05:43

Meanwhile, if you're hungry for some good old fashioned strategic double checks, here's the latest batch of 2+ to 1 bad-to-good. Some are in the cat 4 "churn" category (the 40M-42M) so get 'em while you can.

Code:

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	Solo	Mis	worktodo
38341909	2	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=38341909,71,1
38456843	2	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=38456843,71,1
38898667	8	4	3	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=38898667,71,1
40459187	5	1	2	0	2	0	DoubleCheck=40459187,72,1
40494269	6	0	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=40494269,72,1
40575707	2	0	3	0	1	2	DoubleCheck=40575707,72,1
41537261	4	0	1	1	1	1	DoubleCheck=41537261,72,1
42393961	2	0	5	0	5	0	DoubleCheck=42393961,72,1
42430061	2	1	2	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=42430061,72,1
52276529	21	3	5	5	5	5	DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1
58080709	2	0	4	0	4	0	DoubleCheck=58080709,73,1

0PolarBearsHere · 2016-02-12, 07:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here you go. I picked triple-checks where neither of the first two systems have enough track record to know if they're good or bad. The outcome of these TC's will (hopefully) declare the winner and bump someone further into bad territory.

Code:

exponent    worktodo
55110421    DoubleCheck=55110421,73,1
55112119    DoubleCheck=55112119,73,1
55137587    DoubleCheck=55137587,73,1
55197383    DoubleCheck=55197383,73,1
55203487    DoubleCheck=55203487,73,1
55235711    DoubleCheck=55235711,74,1

Thanks!

ET_ · 2016-02-12, 10:47

Code:

DoubleCheck=46101953,72,1

Verified OK

manfred4 · 2016-02-12, 10:54

Thank you, got them all reserved.
And I think you mean, they are all in Cat 3 with a few in Cat 2, right? Because as of now it says Cat 1 is Exponents below 35780412.

2016-02-11, 07:26	#837
0PolarBearsHere Oct 2015 2×7×19 Posts	Based on the mersenne.ca report it looks like the 770 LLs best at 55M, so I'm happy to take a half dozen of the 55M range to start off with (machine only runs in the evenings). Actually, give me a couple of the 37M ones too, that I can run first to check. Last fiddled with by 0PolarBearsHere on 2016-02-11 at 07:35

2016-02-12, 10:47	#846
ET_ Banned "Luigi" Aug 2002 Team Italia 2⁴·7·43 Posts	Code: DoubleCheck=46101953,72,1 Verified OK

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Double-Double Arithmetic	Mysticial	Software	52	2021-04-23 06:51
Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page	marigonzes	Information & Answers	2	2017-02-14 16:56
x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th?	jasong	jasong	7	2015-08-17 10:56
What about double-checking TF/P-1?	137ben	PrimeNet	6	2012-03-13 04:01
Double the area, Double the volume.	Uncwilly	Puzzles	8	2006-07-03 16:02

2016-02-11, 10:01	#838
manfred4 Mar 2014 Germany 2³·3·5 Posts	Hey Madpoo, I would like to have some of those triple checks as well - I started with two successfull DCs on my 670 and switched to first time LLs, but I think helping you here would make you happy as well and I will check the capabilities of my GPU further. I will leave this machine running without supervision for some time, so could you please give me about 35 of the smallest available tests? Results may be coming in sporadically.

2016-02-11, 10:43	#839
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 14426₈ Posts	I guess it's not worth individually requesting TCs - the mismatches go in the databases and the TCs will get scheduled the next time madpoo does a run - but I have a mismatch for 50015437.

2016-02-12, 10:54	#847
manfred4 Mar 2014 Germany 120₁₀ Posts	Thank you, got them all reserved. And I think you mean, they are all in Cat 3 with a few in Cat 2, right? Because as of now it says Cat 1 is Exponents below 35780412.