![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Dec 2015
32 Posts |
I am new here and new to factoring also.
I own AMD 5870 GPU and core i5 4690. Win 7 64bit. Is there a version of msive that I can run on my GPU and would it be faster than on my CPU? I want to factor 154 decimal digit number first 3 digits 299. Last fiddled with by bozocv on 2015-12-14 at 22:50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
23×3×72 Posts |
You might want to start with YAFU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36×13 Posts |
154 bit number?
or 154 decimal digit number? The answers will be quite different as to which tool to use. For 154-bit - you will get an almost instantaneous factorization with yafu, or you can paste it into www.factordb.com and some computations will be run for you by its engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Dec 2015
32 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Dec 2015
32 Posts |
@Batalov
154 decimal digit... sorry. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
224058 Posts |
For 154-digit number you need to go over some tutorials, e.g.
http://gilchrist.ca/jeff/factoring/n...ers_guide.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Dec 2015
10012 Posts |
I started it like this:
msieve -v -e 0x392D649F152B84CCE79DD50B63DA0BDDEC57A5A3DF1D2327730A14 FCC1331F7590033D7D9358EC13DA510B3972F520069C62C5E6E438912DB8192207474C35B6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4,861 Posts |
YAFU makes a bunch of decisions for you about what parameters to use, and manages each of the tools used to produce the factorization. 154 digits is a big job for YAFU, but it will work. YAFU does not use the GPU-enabled version of msieve, but the GPU is only used for one part of one step; you might save half a day using the GPU yourself, but you'd likely spend half a day in human time learning how to do it all.
Batalov's suggestion is where to begin in order to understand what is happening at each step of the way, and is strongly recommended if you plan to factor more than a single number. That is, the more you learn the more effective your use of the tools will be, but for a single job it's unlikely you'll gain much over YAFU in terms of speed the job completes. Once you get YAFU set up correctly (for instance, telling it how many cores to use), expect about 8-12 days using all cores to complete the factorization. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4,861 Posts |
I thought 512-bit keys were left in the PS2/TI89 era. Hrmph.
I, too, wonder what game this is! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Sep 2009
97710 Posts |
Before RSALS was created, the first TI-Z80 / TI-68k 512-bit RSA public key factorizations used Jeff Gilchrist's NFS Beginners Guide and factMsieve.pl.
Another option is to set up your own copy of the "Factoring as a Service" infrastructure, http://seclab.upenn.edu/projects/faas/ . Its throughput shall trounce your computer's, but cost more. In this day and age, 512-bit RSA keys are laughably easy to break... |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Noob Question | Pickwun | Information & Answers | 7 | 2017-11-07 19:17 |
| Noob Question | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 11 | 2013-03-23 01:31 |
| Prime 95 Noob Question | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 4 | 2009-09-12 14:01 |
| Noob C question | nuggetprime | Programming | 6 | 2008-08-23 11:09 |
| Noob question | xago666 | Information & Answers | 3 | 2008-03-11 01:35 |