![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2011
3·19 Posts |
I'm trying the qflll function Pari for lattice reduction. However, I'm not getting correct answers.
First, the wikipedia example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenstr...tion_algorithm Code:
(20:32) gp > qflll([1,-1,3;1,0,5;1,2,6]) %50 = [-4 5 0] [-1 1 1] [ 1 -1 0] Code:
(20:32) gp > qflll([1, 2, 3;4, 5, 6]) %51 = [-1 4] [ 1 -3] [ 0 0] As you can see, both results are incorrect. What am I doing wrong? Last fiddled with by paul0 on 2015-11-17 at 12:35 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Mar 2006
7378 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
?qflll
qflll(x,{flag=0}): LLL reduction of the vectors forming the matrix x (gives the
unimodular transformation matrix T such that x*T is LLL-reduced). flag is...
Code:
(06:54) gp > x=[1,-1,3;1,0,5;1,2,6] %1 = [1 -1 3] [1 0 5] [1 2 6] (06:54) gp > qflll(x) %2 = [-4 5 0] [-1 1 1] [ 1 -1 0] (06:54) gp > x*qflll(x) %3 = [0 1 -1] [1 0 0] [0 1 2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Sep 2011
1110012 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by paul0 on 2015-11-17 at 13:04 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is best in life? Is it PARI/GP? | JM Montolio A | Lounge | 11 | 2018-03-08 06:26 |
| Pari/GP to PFGW | carpetpool | Programming | 6 | 2017-12-21 06:04 |
| PARI vs GAP | skan | Miscellaneous Math | 0 | 2012-12-16 00:13 |
| pari | devarajkandadai | Programming | 21 | 2012-08-31 18:08 |
| 64-bit Pari? | CRGreathouse | Software | 2 | 2009-03-13 04:22 |