![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
2·467 Posts |
One of the workers is on its second consecutive DC. That doesn't sound like a "from time to time" reality check.
In fact, getting that second straight DC was the event that triggered my posting here -- because it could no longer be viewed as merely an occasional deviation from the setting. Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
I think this has been covered, but have you made sure that the PrimeNet CPU>Computer Properties page agrees with Prime95 Test>Worker Windows? This should be part of the "change-and-change-back" procedure Aaron mentioned above.
This was important for my setup, after I decided to treat the FX-8350 as properly a quad-core instead of an octo-core. With each integer pair and its respective FPU set as a worker, P95 sees four Worker Windows, but PrimeNet still sees eight Worker Threads. On P95 this shows as-
Sorry if I am repeating, but this situation seems really persistent, so I am going all Help Desk on you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
2·467 Posts |
To the Help Desk:
![]() Just checked the Computer Properties page in PrimeNet as you suggested. There are four worker threads, all set to do "LL first test" work; and the percentage of "DC instead of LL" is at zero. Is there anything else I should be looking for? Thanks very much! Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
1015810 Posts |
Hi Rodrigo,
I am afraid that is the best I can do. It seems you have things covered, but the assignments contradict that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
CF116 Posts |
Quote:
They should be okay now and we'll know for sure next time they request more work. All in all though, a few double checks here and there is a good thing. It helps with the DC work and also gives us an idea of how reliable the system is long before anyone starts double-checking your work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
16468 Posts |
Yeah, I'm OK with the occasional DCs for that reason. What is puzzling, though, is that I never did have that computer set to do "whatever makes the most sense," it was always set to do first-time LL tests.
Anyway, I changed the settings back and forth as instructed and hopefully that'll take care of it. I'll report back if the next assignment or two are still not LLs. Rodrigo |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Quadratic time factorization" patent | mickfrancis | Factoring | 5 | 2015-02-17 14:27 |
| Specifing TF factor depth in "Manual Assignments"? | kracker | PrimeNet | 2 | 2012-07-22 17:49 |
| LL assignments on slow PCs "die" shortly before finishing? | Andi47 | PrimeNet | 1 | 2007-02-28 22:03 |
| DJB paper "Factoring into coprimes in essentially linear time" | Chris Card | Factoring | 6 | 2005-06-25 19:41 |
| Exponents to re-release for first-time testing: "harmful" errorcodes | GP2 | Data | 4 | 2003-10-18 22:08 |