![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Åke Tilander"
Apr 2011
Sandviken, Sweden
23616 Posts |
Today is a notable day since it is 1000 days since we last discovered a Mersenne Prime. Attached you find a table of number of days between discoveries:
So what do you think, will there be another 1000 days before we see next Mersenne Prime? My personal guess is that it will take a total of more then 3000 days, but less then 10000 before we see next Mersenne Prime, starting counting from 2013-01-25. Last fiddled with by aketilander on 2015-10-22 at 07:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Oct 2015
2·7·19 Posts |
I'll guess within the next week*.
*answer given to within 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4,861 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Oct 2015
2×7×19 Posts |
Quote:
So until all the previous LL checks are double/triple checked we won't know for sure that some prime number hater isn't just sneakily providing false residuals for the prime numbers and hoping they don't get double checked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
1100010101112 Posts |
I hope we find one before 1384 days which is the current (sad) record. That is a record we do not want to break, which means we need to find the next one before Nov 10th 2016, 20:33:52 UTC.
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=387 Here is a "count-up" since M57885161: http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown...2C885%2C161%29 Code:
M(1398269) Nov 13 1996 M(2976221) Aug 24 1997 +284 days M(3021377) Jan 27 1998 +156 days M(6972593) Jun 1 1999 +490 days M(13466917) Nov 14 2001 +897 days M(20996011) Nov 17 2003 +733 days M(24036583) May 15 2004 +180 days M(25964951) Feb 18 2005 +279 days M(30402457) Dec 15 2005 +300 days M(32582657) Sep 4 2006 +263 days M(43112609) Aug 23 2008 +719 days M(37156667) Sep 6 2008 +14 days M(42643801) Apr 12 2009 +218 days M(57885161) Jan 25 2013 +1384 days ------------------------------------------ +5917 days (=455.15 days average) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.
3E216 Posts |
Well although I may be stating the obvious, it really does not depend so much on our productivity as perhaps in the gap (ratio) between primes. Suppose for a moment we have an exponent gap Ratio of 521/127 like we had between the 12th and 13th Mersenne prime.
That would put the next prime in the vecinity of 2^237,000,000 and I would assume that would take us, barring some kind of miracle, well into the 2030's or late 2020's. So I may be way out of line but rather than discovering a new mersenne prime what would be ideal is that we do a thorugh job of completing the 100,000,000 milestone. Of course if we do that and there is a prime Mn 58,500,000 >n> 100,000,000 that will be discovered too. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
978410 Posts |
Where did you get the exact dates for the early discoveries? The wiki could use some updating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
7·11·43 Posts |
Quote:
http://www.mersenne.org/report_milestones/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
23×1,223 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Åke Tilander"
Apr 2011
Sandviken, Sweden
2×283 Posts |
Quote:
I have used the dates from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime If there are any wrong dates there it would, of course, be good if they could be corrected, also adding the best, most reliable source as a reference. Last fiddled with by aketilander on 2015-10-24 at 11:28 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED! | dabaichi | News | 571 | 2020-10-26 11:02 |
| http://www.mersenne.ca/status/ NOT updated in 3 days | petrw1 | mersenne.ca | 3 | 2019-03-03 15:27 |
| Sad Milestone: 1200 (now 1800+) days since last prime | Aillas | Prime Sierpinski Project | 76 | 2015-05-28 02:32 |
| Twin Prime Days, Prime Day Clusters | cuBerBruce | Puzzles | 3 | 2014-12-01 18:15 |
| The 40th known Mersenne prime, 220996011-1 is not PRIME! | illman-q | Miscellaneous Math | 33 | 2004-09-19 05:02 |