Move 16 - Page 2

WMHalsdorf · 2015-05-10, 19:05

Unless I find something better (which I doubt) I'll be posting 16...Bxb5 on monday.

davar55 · 2015-05-14, 19:30

I agree with our 16. .. Bxb5, and if they respond 17. axb5 then 17. .. Nc7 is ok with me.

...

Just noticed -- what if 18. Bxa5 (instead of Nxa5), attacking our Q. Are we in trouble?

Also, what if 17. Bxa5 (instead of axb5), what's our follow up?

Brian-E · 2015-05-15, 09:19

[QUOTE=davar55;402294]Just noticed -- what if 18. Bxa5 (instead of Nxa5), attacking our Q. Are we in trouble?[/QUOTE]
I think 18.Bxa5 is a better move than 18.Nxa5. See post #6 in this thread.

[QUOTE]Also, what if 17. Bxa5 (instead of axb5), what's our follow up?[/QUOTE]
I don't think they can play that. They would lose two pieces for a rook after 17...Rxa5.

davar55 · 2015-05-15, 11:41

[QUOTE=Brian-E;402334]I think 18.Bxa5 is a better move than 18.Nxa5. See post #6 in this thread.

I don't think they can play that. They would lose two pieces for a rook after 17...Rxa5.[/QUOTE]

I'm not sure, but I'm willing to wait for their next move...

WMHalsdorf · 2015-05-15, 15:23

In this position as the minor pieces disappear the better off our position becomes.

davar55 · 2015-05-17, 20:19

[QUOTE=WMHalsdorf;402350]In this position as the minor pieces disappear the better off our position becomes.[/QUOTE]

This is a good thing.

2015-05-14, 19:30	#13
davar55 May 2004 New York City 5·7·11² Posts	I agree with our 16. .. Bxb5, and if they respond 17. axb5 then 17. .. Nc7 is ok with me. ... Just noticed -- what if 18. Bxa5 (instead of Nxa5), attacking our Q. Are we in trouble? Also, what if 17. Bxa5 (instead of axb5), what's our follow up? Last fiddled with by davar55 on 2015-05-14 at 19:46

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	1	2016-10-25 18:03
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	5	2016-10-22 01:55
Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	0	2016-10-05 15:50
Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	0	2016-09-28 19:51
Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	0	2016-09-19 19:56

2015-05-10, 19:05	#12
WMHalsdorf Feb 2005 Bristol, CT 1001₈ Posts	Unless I find something better (which I doubt) I'll be posting 16...Bxb5 on monday.

2015-05-15, 09:19	#14
Brian-E "Brian" Jul 2007 The Netherlands 6316₈ Posts	[QUOTE=davar55;402294]Just noticed -- what if 18. Bxa5 (instead of Nxa5), attacking our Q. Are we in trouble?[/QUOTE] I think 18.Bxa5 is a better move than 18.Nxa5. See post #6 in this thread. [QUOTE]Also, what if 17. Bxa5 (instead of axb5), what's our follow up?[/QUOTE] I don't think they can play that. They would lose two pieces for a rook after 17...Rxa5.

2015-05-15, 11:41	#15
davar55 May 2004 New York City 5·7·11² Posts	[QUOTE=Brian-E;402334]I think 18.Bxa5 is a better move than 18.Nxa5. See post #6 in this thread. I don't think they can play that. They would lose two pieces for a rook after 17...Rxa5.[/QUOTE] I'm not sure, but I'm willing to wait for their next move...

2015-05-15, 15:23	#16
WMHalsdorf Feb 2005 Bristol, CT 513₁₀ Posts	In this position as the minor pieces disappear the better off our position becomes.

2015-05-17, 20:19	#17
davar55 May 2004 New York City 5·7·11² Posts	[QUOTE=WMHalsdorf;402350]In this position as the minor pieces disappear the better off our position becomes.[/QUOTE] This is a good thing.