![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
1A8916 Posts |
Rook f1-e1
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
Looks like Nb5 to me.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5·937 Posts |
[QUOTE=henryzz;399584]Looks like Nb5 to me.[/QUOTE]
Me too, following richs's earlier analysis, but we are in no hurry :wink: |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3×23×89 Posts |
[QUOTE=paulunderwood;399585]Me too, following richs's earlier analysis, but we are in no hurry :wink:[/QUOTE]
Yes but there is no point in waiting 7 days for the sake of it. Once richs has posted we could probably post at weekend. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
10010010011012 Posts |
[QUOTE=henryzz;399586]Yes but there is no point in waiting 7 days for the sake of it.
Once richs has posted we could probably post at weekend.[/QUOTE] Okay :smile: |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
171810 Posts |
This follows my analysis in move 12:
12. a4 Ba6 13. Nb5 Rfc8 14. Nc4 Qd8 thus driving their queen back to her starting position. I agree with Nb5. Retina, moving our knight to b5 blocks the bishop exchange, thus we don't have to move our f1 rook now. Last fiddled with by richs on 2015-04-08 at 03:55 Reason: in, not is; knight not night |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
6,793 Posts |
I was just envisaging the bishop taking the knight (a6-b5) and then either the pawn or the bishop takes the bishop (a4-b5 or e3-b5). Black doesn't appear to need to move the queen at all.
Last fiddled with by retina on 2015-04-08 at 04:32 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2×859 Posts |
A bishop is worth (or valued) slightly more than a knight, so black would hesitate to exchange their bishop for a knight which we would take with our a4 pawn. Our e2 bishop prevents their queen from then taking the pawn.
|
|
|