![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
33×19 Posts |
I believe that we agreed on 3. .. b5 as a response to 3. d5. Just want to confirm before posting.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
Yes, 3...b5.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2004
New York City
5·7·112 Posts |
Yes I agree.
Quick response? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
33·19 Posts |
Thinking on thier time gives them less time to react.
4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 Bxa6 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
May 2004
New York City
102138 Posts |
[QUOTE=WMHalsdorf;393123]Thinking on their time gives them less time to react.
4. cxb5 a6 5. bxa6 Bxa6[/QUOTE] Agreed, and agreed. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
May 2004
New York City
5·7·112 Posts |
Could we get the #threads and #posts fields in the pwd protected chess subfora
to be public? Seeing 0's there all the time makes me think there's no activity., inspiring impatience. This would give away no significant info. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Feb 2005
Bristol, CT
33·19 Posts |
There is useful information about number of post about each move, in that regard with them not seeing our count is important, as for the peanut gallery that would not effect the game.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
May 2004
New York City
5×7×112 Posts |
[QUOTE=WMHalsdorf;393503]There is useful information about number of post about each move, in that regard with them not seeing our count is important, as for the peanut gallery that would not effect the game.[/QUOTE]
OK, makes sense, keep that number hidden. Is it worth it to reveal the other? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
[QUOTE=davar55;393821]OK, makes sense, keep that number hidden. Is it worth it to reveal the other?[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure we should ask Mike to make any changes of that nature unless we have a serious problem. Personally I can easily see whether anyone has added to this private subforum by looking at the date and time of the last posting and who posted it. If I'm not sure, it's a quick click to see. Do you find the set-up unworkable? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
May 2004
New York City
5×7×112 Posts |
[QUOTE=Brian-E;393835]I'm not sure we should ask Mike to make any changes of that nature unless we have a serious problem. Personally I can easily see whether anyone has added to this private subforum by looking at the date and time of the last posting and who posted it. If I'm not sure, it's a quick click to see. Do you find the set-up unworkable?[/QUOTE]
No, I'm just impatient. I'll get over it ... eventually. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 1 | 2016-10-25 18:03 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-10-05 15:50 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-28 19:51 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-19 19:56 |