Digital Logic Design

[henryzz]

I came across an interesting game recently and though people might like a try at it.
https://e504b5feb2438f1aba61c35ddd55...JYVzNPcW5rRmc/
http://www.reddit.com/r/dldtg/
The coding language is a little hard to understand at first but it is quite a fun puzzle to try and find optimal solutions. I am upto MUX41 so far.
The developer seems to be around but not actively developing. If there was activity and ideas I think he would add more puzzles.

[Xyzzy]

[Mini-Geek]

Minimizing code is hard.

I've gotten as far as completing MUX21, but I'm way over-par on TRUTH_TABLE3 (mine is 17, best 6 IIRC) and MUX21 (8, best 4), so I don't feel like clicking enough to unlock the next puzzle.

Also, the programming language is needlessly difficult to write in. Why not just let me write something like OR(NAND(A,B),NOT(A))? Instead, it takes like a half dozen lines to do something like that.

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by Mini-Geek

Minimizing code is hard.

I've gotten as far as completing MUX21, but I'm way over-par on TRUTH_TABLE3 (mine is 17, best 6 IIRC) and MUX21 (8, best 4), so I don't feel like clicking enough to unlock the next puzzle.

Also, the programming language is needlessly difficult to write in. Why not just let me write something like OR(NAND(A,B),NOT(A))? Instead, it takes like a half dozen lines to do something like that.

if you saved up you could use the upgrade to get an autominer etc.

[bsquared]

Originally Posted by Mini-Geek

Minimizing code is hard.

...

Also, the programming language is needlessly difficult to write in. Why not just let me write something like OR(NAND(A,B),NOT(A))? Instead, it takes like a half dozen lines to do something like that.

Welcome to the world of digital logic design!

[science_man_88]

I wish I had enough intelligence to figure out the not gate lol

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by Mini-Geek

Minimizing code is hard.

I've gotten as far as completing MUX21, but I'm way over-par on TRUTH_TABLE3 (mine is 17, best 6 IIRC) and MUX21 (8, best 4), so I don't feel like clicking enough to unlock the next puzzle.

Also, the programming language is needlessly difficult to write in. Why not just let me write something like OR(NAND(A,B),NOT(A))? Instead, it takes like a half dozen lines to do something like that.

there's a flaw they talk about on the info page where you can click what you want to sell ( for me it was not once I got it since it didn't cost any Si and then hold enter to continue selling without clicking and for me that makes Si pointless now it's just me trying to wrap my head around the programming.

[henryzz]

I have now completed DEMUX14 although not optimally yet.
The coding isn't that hard it just takes a lot of copying.

[TheJudger]

Cool puzzles!

• At start I had some problems with XOR to get par.
• Did "DEMUX12", "DEMUX14" and "DEMUX18x8" one under par.
• I'm totally lost at those latches and flip flops.
• "BIN_TO_7SEG" is kind of broken. DLD(TG) suggest 166 NAND gates but can be done with 37 NAND gates which totally breaks economics (if you care).
• Didn't try ALUx8 so far.

Oliver

[henryzz]

Originally Posted by TheJudger

Cool puzzles!

• At start I had some problems with XOR to get par.
• Did "DEMUX12", "DEMUX14" and "DEMUX18x8" one under par.
• I'm totally lost at those latches and flip flops.
• "BIN_TO_7SEG" is kind of broken. DLD(TG) suggest 166 NAND gates but can be done with 37 NAND gates which totally breaks economics (if you care).
• Didn't try ALUx8 so far.

Oliver

You're doing well
Might be worth posting http://www.reddit.com/r/dldtg/commen...d_bin_to_7seg/ about smashing the record.