mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-11-10, 22:49   #56
MattcAnderson
 
MattcAnderson's Avatar
 
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA

25×52 Posts
Default

Hi Mersenne forum,

I want to try -

hello world

you did a good thing

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6744802

23 + 1 = 3*3

ok, that was fun

*grinz*

Regards,
Matt
MattcAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-11, 11:59   #57
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

164448 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattcAnderson View Post
Hi Mersenne forum,

I want to try -

hello world

you did a good thing

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6744802

23 + 1 = 3*3

ok, that was fun

*grinz*

Regards,
Matt
Do you have a urge for producing content free posts?
You do so repeatedly.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-11, 12:24   #58
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷𒀭"
May 2003
Down not across

29·3·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Do you have a urge for producing content free posts?
You do so repeatedly.
Ooh, Bob, that's a bit harsh. "Homeopathic" might be more appropriate.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-11, 13:31   #59
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

1D2416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Ooh, Bob, that's a bit harsh. "Homeopathic" might be more appropriate.
Is that homeopathic or homeopathetic?
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-11, 20:51   #60
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

EAA16 Posts
Default

(Just checking out the renderer...)
http://www.mathjax.org/demos/tex-samples/
Quote:
The Lorenz Equations
\dot{x} = \sigma(y-x) \\<br />
\dot{y} = \rho x - y - xz \\<br />
\dot{z} = -\beta z + xy<br />

The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
\left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k \right)^2 \leq \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2 \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^n b_k^2 \right)

A Cross Product Formula
\mathbf{V}_1 \times \mathbf{V}_2 =  \begin{vmatrix}<br />
\mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\<br />
\frac{\partial X}{\partial u} &  \frac{\partial Y}{\partial u} & 0 \\<br />
\frac{\partial X}{\partial v} &  \frac{\partial Y}{\partial v} & 0<br />
\end{vmatrix}

The probability of getting k heads when flipping n coins is
P(E)   = {n \choose k} p^k (1-p)^{ n-k}

An Identity of Ramanujan
\frac{1}{\Bigl(\sqrt{\phi \sqrt{5}}-\phi\Bigr) e^{\frac25 \pi}} =<br />
1+\frac{e^{-2\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-4\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-6\pi}}<br />
{1+\frac{e^{-8\pi}} {1+\ldots} } } }

A Rogers-Ramanujan Identity
1 +  \frac{q^2}{(1-q)}+\frac{q^6}{(1-q)(1-q^2)}+\cdots =<br />
\prod_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(1-q^{5j+2})(1-q^{5j+3})},<br />
\quad\quad \text{for $|q|<1$}.

Maxwell’s Equations
\nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{B}} -\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{E}}}{\partial t} & = \frac{4\pi}{c}\vec{\mathbf{j}} \\   \nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{E}} & = 4 \pi \rho \\<br />
\nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{E}}\, +\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{B}}}{\partial t} & = \vec{\mathbf{0}} \\<br />
\nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{B}} & = 0
Tex command inline here:\sqrt{3x-1}+(1+x)^2 in this sentence.
The code for the quoted region above is:
Quote:
[SIZE="4"]The Lorenz Equations
[TEX]\dot{x} = \sigma(y-x) \\
\dot{y} = \rho x - y - xz \\
\dot{z} = -\beta z + xy
[/TEX]

The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
[TEX]\left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_k \right)^2 \leq \left( \sum_{k=1}^n a_k^2 \right) \left( \sum_{k=1}^n b_k^2 \right)[/TEX]

A Cross Product Formula
[TEX]\mathbf{V}_1 \times \mathbf{V}_2 = \begin{vmatrix}
\mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\
\frac{\partial X}{\partial u} & \frac{\partial Y}{\partial u} & 0 \\
\frac{\partial X}{\partial v} & \frac{\partial Y}{\partial v} & 0
\end{vmatrix}[/TEX]

The probability of getting k heads when flipping n coins is
[TEX]P(E) = {n \choose k} p^k (1-p)^{ n-k}[/TEX]

An Identity of Ramanujan
[TEX]\frac{1}{\Bigl(\sqrt{\phi \sqrt{5}}-\phi\Bigr) e^{\frac25 \pi}} =
1+\frac{e^{-2\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-4\pi}} {1+\frac{e^{-6\pi}}
{1+\frac{e^{-8\pi}} {1+\ldots} } } }[/TEX]

A Rogers-Ramanujan Identity
[TEX]1 + \frac{q^2}{(1-q)}+\frac{q^6}{(1-q)(1-q^2)}+\cdots =
\prod_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(1-q^{5j+2})(1-q^{5j+3})},
\quad\quad \text{for $|q|<1$}.[/TEX]

Maxwell’s Equations
[TEX]\nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{B}} -\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{E}}}{\partial t} & = \frac{4\pi}{c}\vec{\mathbf{j}} \\ \nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{E}} & = 4 \pi \rho \\
\nabla \times \vec{\mathbf{E}}\, +\, \frac1c\, \frac{\partial\vec{\mathbf{B}}}{\partial t} & = \vec{\mathbf{0}} \\
\nabla \cdot \vec{\mathbf{B}} & = 0[/TEX]
[/SIZE]
Gamma function from https://stackedit.io/ welcome document:
The Gamma function satisfying \Gamma(n) = (n-1)!\quad\forall <br />
n\in\mathbb N is via through the Euler integral
\Gamma(z) = \int_0^\infty t^{z-1}e^{-t}dt\,
Trying something here. This is from How to draw a commutative diagram? I changed \xrightarrow to \rightarrow because \xrightarrow seemed to cause a syntax error. The small letters are supposed to label arrows (not follow them) so this is not right as yet:
\begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & \rightarrow{i} & A & \rightarrow{f} & B & \rightarrow{q} & C & \rightarrow{d} & 0\\<br />
\downarrow & \searrow & \downarrow & \nearrow & \downarrow & \searrow & \downarrow & \nearrow & \downarrow\\<br />
0 & \rightarrow{j} & D & \rightarrow{g} & E & \rightarrow{r} & F & \rightarrow{e} & 0\end{array}

Last fiddled with by only_human on 2013-11-11 at 21:49 Reason: minor changes to formatting. I used [size=4][/size] inside the quoted region. It only affects the non-tex text
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-12, 04:34   #61
CRGreathouse
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Aug 2006

3·1,993 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by only_human View Post
The small letters are supposed to label arrows (not follow them) so this is not right as yet:
\begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & \rightarrow{i} & A & \rightarrow{f} & B & \rightarrow{q} & C & \rightarrow{d} & 0\\<br />
\downarrow & \searrow & \downarrow & \nearrow & \downarrow & \searrow & \downarrow & \nearrow & \downarrow\\<br />
0 & \rightarrow{j} & D & \rightarrow{g} & E & \rightarrow{r} & F & \rightarrow{e} & 0\end{array}
Subscripting seems to work, is there something you wanted to avoid here?

\begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & \rightarrow_{i} & A & \rightarrow_{f} & B & \rightarrow_{q} & C & \rightarrow_{d} & 0\\<br />
\downarrow & \searrow & \downarrow & \nearrow & \downarrow & \searrow & \downarrow & \nearrow & \downarrow\\<br />
0 & \rightarrow_{j} & D & \rightarrow_{g} & E & \rightarrow_{r} & F & \rightarrow_{e} & 0\end{array}
CRGreathouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-12, 06:11   #62
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

961110 Posts
Default

Why, the superscripting doesn't work for you??

\begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & \rightarrow^{i} & A &  \rightarrow^{f} & B & \rightarrow^{etc}&C \end{array}

(extended arrows use 2 parameters, if you replaced to normal arrow, the second one is not a parameter anymore, so you must use indexing, _ or ^ symbols)

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2013-11-12 at 06:16 Reason: quote to prec post deleted
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-12, 06:35   #63
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

2×1,877 Posts
Default

Either would be fine. I copied it from the linked reference late in my editing because I was looking for something more graphical and I ran out of time. I'm not that TeX savvy and was just massaging the text that I copied to get rid of syntax errors. I have LyX and MiKTeX on my system but haven't been using them. I was also distracted by not wanting to use Category Theory words to talk about that entry because I didn't feel like being a dog trying to bark Greek.

Last fiddled with by only_human on 2013-11-12 at 06:44 Reason: added smilies
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-12, 06:49   #64
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

226138 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by only_human View Post
[offtopic]Now I am getting angry with Xyzzy! Even Raman got his own smiley.... And I am stuck with the big dog, which I can't use... It even doen't look like me, it is tall and slender and I am small and fat [/offtopic]

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2013-11-12 at 06:52
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-09-30, 05:46   #65
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

3×2,741 Posts
Default

Here is an interesting page: http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-09-30, 08:52   #66
only_human
 
only_human's Avatar
 
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002

2·1,877 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xyzzy View Post
Here is an interesting page: http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
Cool. It works from my tablet, which is never a certainty.
only_human is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google Compute Engine GP2 Cloud Computing 32 2018-01-23 02:16
New math rendering engine Xyzzy Math 68 2015-12-21 00:40
An opportunity for search engine optimisation fivemack Aliquot Sequences 6 2015-11-17 20:31
Search engine feedback requested. Xyzzy Forum Feedback 2 2007-05-28 04:22
New search engine jasong Science & Technology 1 2006-08-24 17:09

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:50.


Fri Jul 16 17:50:13 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 15:37, 1 user, load averages: 2.19, 1.62, 1.53

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.