![]() |
|
|
#23 | |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
Quote:
If I run the tests on prpnet I should leave all candidates in the sievefile because it is very easy to remove factors by prpadmin. It only takes some seconds so I use that. Because of the slow computers I see now on s9 (not all) I started the sieving again and I think there is no harm in doing that. I think this is a good way of sieving specially when it is a conjecture when you don't know where you going to find the primes that will eliminate a k. When we come to time for tests it is very hard today If I do a test on a number with a modern i7 3.2Ghz no AVX can take 2 hr but on a i7 with AVX it will only take 1 hr. On a c2q6600 it will take about 4 -5hr Lennart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Sep 2013
Perth, Au.
2·72 Posts |
I have one core of an AMD X6 1000T on the S9 port currently. Is taking about 7.5 hours to crunch one WU (6 completed in 44:36:55).
What machine to base the sieving level on? I would say the average machine over the life of the port should be the basis. Not my AMD CPU, (non AVX) etc. Maybe I will upgrade to Skylake next year with DDR4 and AVX-512? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
100011000002 Posts |
Quote:
Most sieving is done on i7 2700 at 3.7Ghz. It is on about 6 hr/f on that computer. and I do them in about 4 hr when I llr them on that computer Lennart Last fiddled with by Lennart on 2014-09-10 at 15:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
45T-54T completed.
I will do some more because I see tests on the s9 port is not very fast. Lennart |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
Both of the computers I have running S9 right now only do PRPnet part-time (mostly at night) - they're laptops that go places during the day.For a more accurate figure, I'm getting about 17,200 seconds = 4.7 hours/test on one of the laptops (Sandy Bridge i7 dualcore - i7-2620M). Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2014-09-11 at 06:08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101×103 Posts |
I just removed the factors up to P=54T in port 1300.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
Some more factors.
Lennart |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25·5·7 Posts |
This is a strange sieve! I would like to get some sec. more but it moves very slow.
62T-70T done I will now do it up to 80T and see if time increase anything. Lennart |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
28A316 Posts |
Factors up to P=70T removed in port 1300.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
25×5×7 Posts |
70T-80T complete and I stop here I am at ยจ8 hr now.
Lennart |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mandela effect, general discussion and how would you study it scientifically? | jasong | Lounge | 12 | 2018-04-15 05:13 |
| General factoring algorithms not using sieving | mickfrancis | Factoring | 21 | 2016-02-22 19:38 |
| General Unix job-scheduling discussion | pinhodecarlos | Software | 19 | 2014-04-17 15:04 |
| What about general purpose sieving of k*b^n+/-1? | jasong | GPU Computing | 1 | 2012-04-03 10:52 |
| Sieving Discussion | ltd | Prime Sierpinski Project | 26 | 2005-11-01 07:45 |