![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Jul 2012
Paris, France.
11000112 Posts |
Quote:
8 is not square or tri number. Is cubic butt no matter. 8(8+1)÷2=36 So 36 is 8 tri We go 36(36+1)÷2= 666 Now how many primes less than 8? 7 5 3 2 so answer is four. Less than 36? 31 29 23 19 17 13 11 7 5 3 2 so answer is eleven. So we keep going like that to get more count of the primes. Now this is for Bernard Riemann strong theory on how many primes but not by 2^ x or 10^ y just the greatest number is by 8 tri tri tri again. Call those terms if you please. Let: 8 be first term 36 be second term 666 be third term This phone does not have pettite subscripts so we present as so... T1= 8 count of primes less than T1= 4 T2= 36 count of primes less ........T2 = 11 T3= 666............................................T3= 121 I know the primes up to T30 have not all been Erotic seiveed . I don't pretend people counted them this desired way. I must follow observed pattern. It will take real precious time and so much electric. Horrors not to know. Passions cost real money. Can a computer count this way? I must pay to be true to myself and chase pattern if possible. I am charite butt no presu.option on you or friends. Cheese head is kind. May be occupied. My geometry teacher paid electric for 3 years on my passion. Stupid is hard to tell. Thank You. You are nice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Aug 2006
22×3×499 Posts |
If someone can work out a translation, let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
240358 Posts |
K.G.S., here's the deal.
(I appreciate that there is, maybe, a real person behind your nickname's thick skin. So listen up.) At your 101st post, if you content/noise ratio stays below 1%, you will get a ban of 1 week. Then for a month, then for a year. Life is too short to waste it on complete and utter bollocks, eh? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5×223 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK
1010100012 Posts |
Perseverance. This is what I think the OP means.
Start with the function used to generate the triangular numbers, i.e. T(n) = n(n+1)/2 and beginning with t1 = 8, which is not a triangular number, generate a sequence by applying T recursively to t1 (use lower-case letters for this sequence to avoid confusion with T1, etc., which are triangular numbers) so t2 = T(t1) = T(8) = 36 t3 = T(t2) = T(T(t1)) = ... = T(36) = 666 and so on, giving this sequence 8, 36, 666, 222111, 24666759216, etc. It would seem the OP is interested in knowing the number of primes between successive pairs of entries in this sequence. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK
337 Posts |
I think the OP means that the primes have not been sieved using the sieve of Eratosthenes as far as T30.
To the OP: would it help if you posted your message in French? My French is pretty awful, but ... est-ce qu'il vous peut aider si vous écrivez votre messages en français? |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Aug 2006
10111011001002 Posts |
Thanks BudgieJane!
I find with differences Kathegetes, does this help? Last fiddled with by CRGreathouse on 2014-07-25 at 15:01 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Jul 2012
Paris, France.
32·11 Posts |
Quote:
So all but first term t=8? Π (t2=8)? Sorry, how to do petite subscriptions and Greek letters at this club is big problem. Is it correct that 6592875536327244522 is limit to sieved in completed order? I have want this much since 18 Aug 07. Now I'll see for RH project what holds. Going no further I then looked at counts of perfects. This table does not have Mr. Coopers newest. Done 4+ years ago by a girl, me pulling hair. I could not check this. Trivial radix of 8 is the zeroeth term as 3.5311288... Mind the scientific note. Term Pn. Mp. Greater 0. 0. 1. 3.5311288... 1 1. 2. 8 2 2. 3. 36 3. 3. 4. 666 4. 4. 6. 222111 5. 6 8. 24666759216 6. 8. 9. 3.04...10'20 7. 9. 12. 4.62...10'40 8. 12. 12. 1.07...10'81 9. 12. 13. 5.73...10'161 10. 13. 14. 1.64...10'323 11. 14. 15. 1.34...10'646 12. 15. 17. 9.11...10'1291 13. 18. 20. 4.14...10'2583 14. 20. 23. 8.61...10'5166 15. 23. 26. 3.70...10'10333 16. 26. 27. 6.87...10'20666 17. 27. 30. 2.36...10'41333 18. 30. 31. 2.78...10'82666 19. 31. 31. 3.89...10'165332 20. 31. 32. 7.57...10'330664 21. 33. 33. 2.86...10'661329 22. 33. 37. 4.11...10'1322658 23. 34. 38. 8.44...10'2645316 24. 38. 39. 3.56...10'5290633 25. 39. 44. 6.36...10'10581266 26. 44. 47 ? 2.02...10'21162533 27. 47? 2.05...10'42325066 28. 2.10...10'84650132 29. (?) 2'346348367-1 2.22...10'169300264 30. if Mp then Pn 2.46...10'338600528 31. 3.40...10'677201056 So much wonder. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Jul 2012
Paris, France.
32×11 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Jul 2012
Paris, France.
11000112 Posts |
[QUOTE=Batalov;379014]K.G.S., here's the deal.
(I appreciate that there is, maybe, a real person behind your nickname's thick skin. So listen up.) At your 101st post, if you content/noise ratio stays below 1%, you will get a ban of 1 week. Then for a month, then for a year. Life is too short to waste it on complete and utter bollocks, eh?[/QUOTE oooh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5·223 Posts |
Please note, as was discussed here over two (Earth) years ago, the Mersenne number
Last fiddled with by NBtarheel_33 on 2014-07-26 at 22:19 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Braswell: Low power, low cost mprime? | Mark Rose | Hardware | 9 | 2015-11-26 22:23 |
| Voting question Intel vs. AMD cost | jasong | Hardware | 7 | 2015-02-02 19:23 |
| Cost to compute prime | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 30 | 2013-12-18 03:34 |
| New report: Cost per Factor Found... | chalsall | GPU to 72 | 14 | 2011-12-09 16:54 |
| V25.7 TF estimate way out ... or am I? | petrw1 | PrimeNet | 5 | 2008-11-08 02:23 |