![]() |
|
|
#67 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11×577 Posts |
Here is v1.0.3. I fixed a calculation error in the stats that I inadvertently added in the previous build. I also made the following changes:
1) Delete the .ckpt file when done. 2) Write to the output file whenever the .ckpt file is written. 3) Apply factors from xyyxsieve.log to the input file before processing it. These were designed to make it safer to stop and restart without losing factors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
"Norbert"
Jul 2014
Budapest
1558 Posts |
I tested the program with command line:
xyyxsievecl64.exe -v --platform=1 -x4000 -X8020 -y8001 -Y8020 -P100000 -t8 -s2000 -S+ -oxyyx_8020p.out -f1 -F1 When i use -S+ then only the x^y+y^x numbers were sieved, when -S- then x^y+y^x and x^y-y^x numbers were sieved, when -Sb then error: Fatal Error: sign must be specified. In the help file is: -S --sign=+/-/b sign to sieve for I would like to use xyyxsievecl64.exe for only x^y-y^x numbers sieve. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11×577 Posts |
My double-check for all x/y has yielded this:
1467^4076+4076^1467 is 3-PRP! The range containing this PRP was searched prior to the creation of MultiSieve. I'm still double-checking the range where both x and y are <= 10000. I'm about 50% complete. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
Quote:
You're probably just testing, but I recommend using a larger range for y due to optimizations in the code. You might also want to increase -s and decrease -t to improve performance, but I'll leave that for you to figure out what works best on your machine. Last fiddled with by rogue on 2014-07-19 at 00:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
"Norbert"
Jul 2014
Budapest
6D16 Posts |
Quote:
It works perfect. I can now sieve only XY+, only XY- PRPs and the two simultaneously. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11000110010112 Posts |
Quote:
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11×577 Posts |
Here are two more PRPS that were missed. These were probably missed due to the bug in MultiSieve.
1490^11487+11487^1490 2239^12462+12462^2239 I've finished the double check where y <= 2500 and x <= 12500. I have a ways to go before finishing the rest of y <= 12500. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36×13 Posts |
Intriguingly, the second one is in factordb since July 11, 2014
P.S. EDIT: And in prptop (Norbert Schneider, 07/2014) Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2014-07-27 at 21:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
"Norbert"
Jul 2014
Budapest
109 Posts |
I'm Norbert Schneider.
On July 26, 2014 have I finished my search in the interval 12,051<=x<=12,500, 2001<=y<=x-1. My last new PRPs have i sent to Andrey Kulsha, but he has so far the website not updated. The last PRPs: 6330^12421+12421^6330, 47218 digits, 4569^12448+12448^4569, 45558 digits, 8602^12451+12451^8602, 48990 digits, 2239^12462+12462^2239, 41749 digits. |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus
24·52 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Leyland Primes: ECPP proofs | Batalov | XYYXF Project | 17 | 2021-07-12 20:05 |
| Mersenne Primes p which are in a set of twin primes is finite? | carpetpool | Miscellaneous Math | 3 | 2017-08-10 13:47 |
| Distribution of Mersenne primes before and after couples of primes found | emily | Math | 34 | 2017-07-16 18:44 |
| On Leyland Primes | davar55 | Puzzles | 9 | 2016-03-15 20:55 |
| possible primes (real primes & poss.prime products) | troels munkner | Miscellaneous Math | 4 | 2006-06-02 08:35 |