![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jul 2014
2×32×52 Posts |
Hi,
I recently bought an 8-core machine so that I could do 8 LL tests at the same time. I'm running prime95 on Win7 64-bit. The trouble I'm having is that I can't seem to get 8 cores working at the same time. There's an option on Test->Worker Windows to change the number of CPU's to use but I'm not sure this is the thing that needs changing and besides, the option is not active (it's fixed). In the past, when I've ran prime 95 on a machine with x cores, prime95 automatically gets x assignments. Can someone help me get all 8 cores working? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
What is your CPU? Is it 8 physical cores, or are you including hyper threads? These are just preliminary questions. I've never seen the "Number of worker windows" option locked down, so I'm not sure what that could signify.
You might try assigning specific affinities for each core. At the least, this might give other indications of what is going on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jul 2014
1110000102 Posts |
AMDFX9370 Black Edition 4.4GHz
How do I go about assigning different affinities to each core then please? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
2×83 Posts |
stop prime95
test -> worker window set option 'CPUs to use (multithreading)' to 1 and click 'ok' (needed!) again test -> worker window set option 'Number of worker windows to run' to 8 and click 'ok' continue prime95 now it should work if you have 8 assignemts for 8 workers in your worktodo-file. edit: hm, ok, if the option 'CPUs to use (multithreading)' is fixed then its another problem. Or try to change it manually in 'local.txt' in your p95-folder. stop prime95 change option 'WorkerThreads=' to 8 change option 'ThreadsPerTest=' to 1 (I hope it is the correct order...) save changes and restart prime95 I hope this helps. Maybe the relative new FX9370 BE is not detected correct by prime95, but not sure, sry Last fiddled with by MatWur-S530113 on 2014-07-15 at 16:34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston
5·17·89 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
11·389 Posts |
You may run into some memory (or other) bottlenecks if you try to run 8 LLs at once. You might find better performance by having each test run on two or more cores.
If you haven't already, you should run a benchmark in Prime95 (Options > Benchmark); one of the parts of it shows what total throughput (in iterations per second) you get with different combinations of workers per core. This should help you choose the best setup. Quote:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by TimSorbet on 2014-07-15 at 16:39 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
16610 Posts |
That's for sure! 220W TDP has the processor. I hope it is a liquide-cooled one ;)
And Core Temp 1.0 RC6 (actual version, free available) is very helpful for all CPUs running prime95. GPU-user should use GPU-Z 0.7.8 (actual version, free available), too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jul 2014
2×32×52 Posts |
Thanks a million guys. It's great to know there's lots of knowledgeable people on this site.
I managed to get all 8 cores working :) :) I'm a bit worried about the CPU overheating. I've got a Noctua HN-D14 cooler on it. What's your reckoning - is it going to break? /* EDIT */ What I did was add a variable called WorkerThreads to the list in local.txt because there wasn't one there. I set it to 8, and lo and behold, all 8 cores have a job BUT, the expected completion dates are Nov 2016. Since I can do 4 similarly sized Mersenne number tests on a slower machine in 3 months I'm wondering why these ones are set to take so long. Last fiddled with by wildrabbitt on 2014-07-15 at 18:14 Reason: spelling mistake |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
32×7×163 Posts |
It will be hot (and possibly not 8-fold fast) for yet another reason:
Quote:
Most of the LL (prime95) computation is floating point, so the scaling factor will be just around 4. (It is possible that 8 threads will be slower than 4: there are still just 4 FPUs but twice as much memory access. You have to test all comnfigurations, and pick the best.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Jul 2014
2×32×52 Posts |
Thanks.
I changed WorkerThreads to 4 in local.txt The program does run 4 seperate tests but when I go to to the worker windows box and click OK, I get the message You have allocated more threads than CPU's available. ...which explains why the expected completion dates for these 4 are Sep 2015. I guess things aren't as simple as adding a variable to a config file. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
32×7×163 Posts |
AMD's naming these chips 8-core (and other similar non-Opteron-non-Phenom versions) was a subject of quite a bit of scorn. Some could even say that this was deceptive advertising. But then again, they are 8-integer-core chips, so some algorithms may benefit. Maybe even a special LL implementation. Maybe, George or Ernst could comment.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to run Prime95 as service in Win7? | Matt | Information & Answers | 12 | 2022-03-28 16:00 |
| Need Win7 install CD | ewmayer | Mlucas | 41 | 2020-11-11 20:14 |
| How do I move work assignments to faster computer with fewer cores? | jdmcs | Software | 9 | 2015-05-02 03:07 |
| MFAKTC won't start under RDP (win7) | swl551 | Software | 23 | 2014-10-17 16:25 |
| XP 32-bit to Win7 64-bit slowdown | willmore | Software | 6 | 2009-11-07 05:33 |