mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-09-25, 22:40   #353
Lennart
 
Lennart's Avatar
 
"Lennart"
Jun 2007

25·5·7 Posts
Default

Congrats Max :)


Lennart
Lennart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-27, 14:48   #354
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Well, this was quite the fun surprise in my mailbox this morning:

31340*6^833096+1 is prime!

My largest yet! (Just under 2 megabits.) When I first saw it I wasn't quite sure if it had topped my personal record - I'd nabbed a prime at n=1.97M a while back on the base-2 multi-conjecture drive, so I thought, 648280 digits is a bit under 2M, probably not quite enough to beat 1.97M. I was, however, glad to see that my intuition was wrong when I reported it!



Another down, 14 to go!

Edit: Okay, now someone else needs to bring one in and make it a pair.

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2013-09-27 at 14:49
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-27, 17:23   #355
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

1040310 Posts
Default

Way to go Max!

gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 02:31   #356
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Found another big base 6 prime over the Christmas holiday while I wasn't watching my computers so closely...you know what they say, a watched pot never boils (and the converse certainly seems to have been true for the last number of primes I've found!).

125098*6^896696+1 is prime! (697771 digits)
(incidentally, my new personal record by about 50,000 digits)

13 k's left to go...and just 100K more to n=1M!

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2014-01-06 at 02:32
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 03:03   #357
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101×103 Posts
Default

gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-06, 10:37   #358
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22×23×31 Posts
Default

That deserves an Atta Max

Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-01-06 at 10:37
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-08, 18:50   #359
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

624910 Posts
Default

Looks like I missed this one a couple weeks ago:

33706*6^910462+1 (708482 digits)

12 k's to go!
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-08, 19:11   #360
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101×103 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Looks like I missed this one a couple weeks ago:

33706*6^910462+1 (708482 digits)

12 k's to go!
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-07, 19:55   #361
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

624910 Posts
Default

Believe it or not, it looks like we're close to finishing this! (sort of...) By my estimate, we'll be reaching n=1M in about 10 days.

This, of course, exhausts our remaining sieve file for this drive. I believe the intent is to put the base 2/4 k's currently being done in the sieving drive into port 1400 next - Gary, is that correct? I see we're still some distance from the optimal depth of p=650T; I wonder if we might be close enough to break of p=2M-3M, though.

In any event, I'll keep the cores I've got on port 1400 (all but one i5 quad which is on NPLB 2000) for the foreseeable future. During the summer, that will be:
-Core 2 Duo E4500 (2 cores, circa 2007)
-Phenom II X4 N970 (4 cores, laptop circa 2011, actually a little slower than the Core2 for this size of tests due to not much cache)
-i7-2620M (2 cores with HT, laptop circa 2011 - much faster)

Not much, but we've had some others helping out on 1400 lately, so things have been moving much more quickly. Particularly, I see one core each of an Ivy Bridge and a Haswell on there - those carry a lot of weight.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-08, 06:52   #362
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101×103 Posts
Default

Yes this drive has gone faster than I expected. As for port 1400, unfortunately it will go offline when this drive is finished until we finish sieving the base 2/4 k's to P=650T. The optimal sieve depth is for all of n=2M-5M. Breaking off a portion of that would be long term inefficient.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2014-06-08 at 21:12
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-08, 21:18   #363
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

1040310 Posts
Default

Another thought: After Sierp base 6 is done here to n=1M, what would everyone think of crunching Riesel base 6 on port 1400 until our new base 2/4 drive is done sieving? R6 currently has 2 k's remaining and is at n=1.5M with no reservations and is sieved thru n=2M. The tests would be ~2-3 times as long as S6 at n=1M but there are < 1/5th as many candidates so the n-ranges would process more quickly. We would not have to test the entire rest of the range thru n=2M in the highly likely event that the base 2/4 effort is done sieving first, although we could ask people what they think at that point.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2014-06-08 at 21:19
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sierp base 16 - team drive #1 gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 254 2014-06-10 16:00
Sierp base 63 - team drive #5 rogue Conjectures 'R Us 146 2011-04-20 05:12
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive II gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 46 2009-10-26 18:19
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ib gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 43 2009-03-06 08:41
Sierp base 3 - mini-drive Ia gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 170 2008-11-11 05:10

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:05.


Tue Jul 27 10:05:24 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 4:34, 0 users, load averages: 2.09, 1.97, 1.93

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.