![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jun 2012
22×13×59 Posts |
I'll take C211_137_135 for ECM to t50.
Last fiddled with by XYYXF on 2015-07-07 at 12:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus
6208 Posts |
ECM tests help us to find some relatively small factors. Usually we run GMP-ECM:
https://gforge.inria.fr/projects/ecm/ The most popular ECM tasks are: t55: 18000 curves at B1 = 110M t60: 42000 curves at B1 = 260M t65: 70000 curves at B1 = 850M It's strongly recommended to perform them sequentially (i.e. t60 only after t55). The numbers 55, 60, etc. estimate the size of the factors, e.g., t55 finds the most of factors up to 55-digit decimal length. Currently yoyo@home is performing t55: http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/down...m/xy/wu_status Certain composites survived deeper ECM tests: http://www.primefan.ru/xyyxf/status.html#work http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=19352 http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=19353 There's also a list of composites which need ECM to become feasible GNFS targets: http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=20318 Please take into account that information when choosing a number to be tested with ECM. If you find a factor fitting the Top-20 table, please let us know the parameters of the lucky factorization (B1 and sigma values). Last fiddled with by XYYXF on 2016-08-24 at 09:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3·17·97 Posts |
Is there an ecmserver?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Jun 2012
22·13·59 Posts |
I will take it up to t55.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jan 2005
Minsk, Belarus
24·52 Posts |
Maybe there's Ryan again? Unfortunately he doesn't inform us about his efforts :(
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×17×97 Posts |
Quote:
rpropper at stanford.edu (Ryan Propper) or rpropper at cs.stanford.edu Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2014-05-20 at 17:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Jun 2012
22·13·59 Posts |
I occasionally trade PMs with Ryan, but I did not have his email address. Thanks. I'll contact him directly.
It appears he (or someone) is running the list of composites to t55. Which is very cool, as long as we document it. A (dumb) question - is there an easy way to check the entire list of xyyxf composites against fdb to see if any others have been further factored over the years? I did a few cut/paste operations to find the factors discussed above, but that's not practical for almost 1200 composites. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Jun 2012
22·13·59 Posts |
I heard from Ryan - thanks Carlos for his e-mail address.
He sends the following: Quote:
eta: Ryan confirms via log file that he factored C222_115_98 with SNFS, and it found two factors. Just coincidence they look like ECM hits. C212_113_103 is not Ryan's work. Last fiddled with by swellman on 2014-05-21 at 00:36 Reason: add'l information received |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reservations | ET_ | FermatSearch | 226 | 2021-04-25 19:47 |
| Linear algebra reservations, progress and results | wombatman | NFS@Home | 2768 | 2018-06-02 15:06 |
| NFS results and reservations | XYYXF | XYYXF Project | 348 | 2017-09-08 04:38 |
| Reservations | kar_bon | Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n-1) | 129 | 2016-09-05 09:23 |
| Where are my reservations | fivemack | PrimeNet | 3 | 2016-02-08 17:58 |