refused result - Page 2

kracker · 2014-04-30, 20:53

Yes, PRPNet please...

I have to restart 2-3 "terminals" a day on LLRNet.

gd_barnes · 2014-05-02, 03:42

My inclination at this point is to change one of the LLRnet servers to PRPnet so that we have 3 PRPnet servers and 1 LLRnet server. I'll see what current PRPnet servers I have available. I don't want to create a new one.

Ian, I'm thinking that we can stop the 8k mini-drive on LLRnet port 7000 at n=1.575M and start processing it on a PRPnet server. After that is done to n=2M (which will be a while), then we could change the 17k maxi-drive on LLRnet port 3500 over to the same PRPnet server. Are you OK with this? That would ultimately phase out LLRnet.

MyDogBuster · 2014-05-04, 05:17

Quote:

Ian, I'm thinking that we can stop the 8k mini-drive on LLRnet port 7000 at n=1.575M and start processing it on a PRPnet server. After that is done to n=2M (which will be a while), then we could change the 17k maxi-drive on LLRnet port 3500 over to the same PRPnet server. Are you OK with this? That would ultimately phase out LLRnet.

Okay by me. You can use my private PRPNET - port 1468. Max may have to jiggle some things to show that on the PRPNET status page.

gd_barnes · 2014-05-05, 22:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by MyDogBuster

Okay by me. You can use my private PRPNET - port 1468. Max may have to jiggle some things to show that on the PRPNET status page.

OK, I have port 1468 cleaned out and ready to go. Candidates are prepared but have not yet been loaded. I've contacted Dave about behind-the-scenes stats stuff and Max about updating the status page. I've already heard back from Dave. It may be a while before I hear from Max but we can go without the status page update for a short period of time. I'll wait 3-4 days after Dave says he is ready before loading anything and making the official announcement.

Ian, in the mean time, would you mind making port 7000 more of a priority for your LLRnet clients? I will delete all pairs n>1575000 in a little while. I'm just trying to get it mostly cleaned out so there's not much of a gap. Thanks.

Gary

AMDave · 2014-05-07, 09:50

I just checked Max's program prpnet-status-pagegen and the port is all accounted for.
Max already has that port coded for.
Should also be good to go.
Fire at will. .... awww poor Will :P

2014-05-02, 03:42	#13
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	My inclination at this point is to change one of the LLRnet servers to PRPnet so that we have 3 PRPnet servers and 1 LLRnet server. I'll see what current PRPnet servers I have available. I don't want to create a new one. Ian, I'm thinking that we can stop the 8k mini-drive on LLRnet port 7000 at n=1.575M and start processing it on a PRPnet server. After that is done to n=2M (which will be a while), then we could change the 17k maxi-drive on LLRnet port 3500 over to the same PRPnet server. Are you OK with this? That would ultimately phase out LLRnet. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2014-05-02 at 03:43

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Odd result	swellman	YAFU	15	2016-02-25 00:38
What does my result mean?	Unregistered	Information & Answers	6	2013-04-16 21:52
Odd result	1997rj7	PrimeNet	2	2009-12-04 08:48
New Result	R.D. Silverman	NFSNET Discussion	1	2005-04-19 23:45
Server refused your new result	vaughan	Prime Sierpinski Project	2	2005-02-04 04:06

2014-04-30, 20:53	#12
kracker "Mr. Meeseeks" Jan 2012 California, USA 2³×271 Posts	Yes, PRPNet please... I have to restart 2-3 "terminals" a day on LLRNet.

2014-05-07, 09:50	#16
AMDave Jan 2006 deep in a while-loop 2·7·47 Posts	I just checked Max's program prpnet-status-pagegen and the port is all accounted for. Max already has that port coded for. Should also be good to go. Fire at will. .... awww poor Will :P