GPU to 72 status... - Page 255

Aramis Wyler · 2014-04-22, 22:10

Mine are not reference, they are the evga FTW Hydro Copper 1 and 2. But his also was overclocked. I'm surprised though that the 660 runs at that rate - I'm glad it's quiet.

James Heinrich · 2014-04-22, 22:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xyzzy

When we ran our 660Ti it was good for ~275 a day.

Remember the 660 Ti has 30% more GFLOPS than the non-Ti version that Gordon has.

Xyzzy · 2014-04-22, 22:52

Video card nomenclature is too confusing!

chalsall · 2014-04-22, 23:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xyzzy

Video card nomenclature is too confusing!

Please do try to keep up.

kracker · 2014-04-22, 23:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Please do try to keep up.

(A little unnecessary I think, but purely imo)

James Heinrich · 2014-04-22, 23:30

Recent Ti-suffixed GPUs have roughly a 25-30% boost over their non-Ti counterparts:

Quote:

GeForce GTX 780/Ti +27%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti +25%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti +31%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti +16% (+20% for the 448-core version)

Where it gets more subtly confusing is when the same model number is used for dramatically different-performing GPUs. For example the GeForce GTX 460 (907 GFLOPS) should not be confused with the GeForce GTX 460 (1046 GFLOPS), nor with the GeForce GTX 460 SE (749) or the GeForce GTX 460M (518).

Axelsson · 2014-04-22, 23:31

I'm bringing up two second hand cards I just got my hands on, two Radeon 6950. One is running just fine but the other one have some random hardware errors and are failing circa 1% of the tests in the -st2 self test.
Is it okay to use it for TF? It still finds 99% of the factors.

/Göran

chalsall · 2014-04-22, 23:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by kracker

(A little unnecessary I think, but purely imo)

I like to push the edge of humor. Mike understands....

kracker · 2014-04-22, 23:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axelsson

I'm bringing up two second hand cards I just got my hands on, two Radeon 6950. One is running just fine but the other one have some random hardware errors and are failing circa 1% of the tests in the -st2 self test.
Is it okay to use it for TF? It still finds 99% of the factors.

/Göran

Is it overclocked?

Gordon · 2014-04-22, 23:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by kracker

Hmm, so you're getting less out of dual 660's than a 580 with less sound and more power consumption.

EDIT: Is Kepler really more power efficient W/GHz? Hmm...

It's the sound that's the killer for me, the 580 was like sitting next to an industrial blower unit

Gordon · 2014-04-22, 23:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

That doesn't sound right to me. Are you running two instances of mfactx? Or maybe you mean 375/card?

On my gtx480 + gtx580 I get 820 GHD/day in the 69M range with 2 instances of mfactc..

Pailt GTX-660 - stock speed - 171 days/day

Gigabyte Windforce x2 - 200 Mhz overclock - 207 days/day

2014-04-22, 22:10	#2795
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2³·53 Posts	Mine are not reference, they are the evga FTW Hydro Copper 1 and 2. But his also was overclocked. I'm surprised though that the 660 runs at that rate - I'm glad it's quiet. Last fiddled with by Aramis Wyler on 2014-04-22 at 22:13

2014-04-22, 23:31	#2801
Axelsson Jul 2012 Sweden 2×3×7 Posts	Iffy GPU I'm bringing up two second hand cards I just got my hands on, two Radeon 6950. One is running just fine but the other one have some random hardware errors and are failing circa 1% of the tests in the -st2 self test. Is it okay to use it for TF? It still finds 99% of the factors. /Göran

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2014-04-22, 22:52	#2797
Xyzzy "Mike" Aug 2002 2·23·179 Posts	Video card nomenclature is too confusing!