![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
41708 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
May 2013
East. Always East.
6BF16 Posts |
Quote:
I ban the guy above for even suggesting I have the right to say whether or not to ban the guy above him. That's his territory, not mine. On the other hand, had you not said anything, I WOULD have been allowed to ban him because he would be above me. Instead you are, so I ban you. Last fiddled with by TheMawn on 2013-12-08 at 06:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
May 2013
East. Always East.
6BF16 Posts |
I ban the guy above me for missing Kracker's post and thus rendering his entire spiel a bunch of gibberish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Jun 2013
107 Posts |
I don't ban the person above me, because he already banned himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
13·89 Posts |
I don't ban the user above me because I am unsure how to say this users name, and I don't want to look even more foolish.
Last fiddled with by chappy on 2013-12-10 at 03:08 Reason: gender neutralizing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
"Gang aft agley"
Sep 2002
2×1,877 Posts |
I ban Muzak in elevators, ketchup in little plastic pouches and hot-air hand-dryers.
("Simon" movie reference) http://www.csmonitor.com/1980/0312/031202.html Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Jun 2013
107 Posts |
Quote:
P.S. Is "he" not gender neutral? I had thought it was, like "mankind" to refer to humanity, not only men... I guess while I am here I should not ban the user above me. He is only human after all... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2×3×1,693 Posts |
NOT banned!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
13·89 Posts |
The user above is banned because Christmas sucks and it's apparently been too quiet around here!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
7·467 Posts |
The above user is correct about Christmas but is nonetheless banned for describing it with a word which doesn't pass the nanny filters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
250348 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How will the new rules apply to old assignments? | NBtarheel_33 | PrimeNet | 72 | 2014-03-02 20:16 |
| Throwing the hammer | davieddy | Puzzles | 6 | 2011-09-06 06:40 |
| QM shown to apply to motion of large objects | Orgasmic Troll | Science & Technology | 0 | 2010-04-06 21:18 |