![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
22058 Posts |
You must ban or not ban the user above you for some reason or other such as:
1. Their avatar 2. Their post 3. Their lack of prime finding ability Please give a good/creative reason. I will start: I ban the person above me for not existing. Idea stolen from elsewheres on the interwebs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2×3×1,693 Posts |
I don't ban the person above me by reason of a cool avatar.
![]() BUT....... ( I do ban the person above me because the post proves dickishness, to which the poster has previously admitted. )
Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-12-07 at 06:26 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
7×467 Posts |
I don't ban the person above me because he starts threads in the soap box which I can actually understand. If he got himself banned it would all be over my head there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
3×1,181 Posts |
This game isn't as funny if a mod plays it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
226668 Posts |
I ban the guy above for being a supermod!
(why can't we ban the guy below too? )I ban the guy below if he bans me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
1100110001012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
3·1,181 Posts |
Okay, you're banned for your infuriatingly even temper. You often make the supermods look bad.
Last fiddled with by jasonp on 2013-12-07 at 16:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
115710 Posts |
You are banned for looking bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
2·5·293 Posts |
I ban you all for a lack of puns in your banter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
13×89 Posts |
It looks like Mark rose to the occasion!
but I ban him for lack of puns in his banter! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
May 2004
New York City
108B16 Posts |
I do NOT ban the preceding banner 'cause that would
unban his predecessor which would cause a ripple effect banning all of us and I just couldn't handle a world without the forum. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How will the new rules apply to old assignments? | NBtarheel_33 | PrimeNet | 72 | 2014-03-02 20:16 |
| Throwing the hammer | davieddy | Puzzles | 6 | 2011-09-06 06:40 |
| QM shown to apply to motion of large objects | Orgasmic Troll | Science & Technology | 0 | 2010-04-06 21:18 |