![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Feb 2013
45810 Posts |
A number I came across a little while ago.
125169005719914348816520676003006990595104088750459775327657394996598953675214064913848636757851 This number is not willing to factorize. Can anyone offer some advice please? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
You can use YAFU to factorize that number (a c96, which means a 96-digit composite) in a fairly short amount of time (seconds, minutes, or hours for a number of this size, depending on what it takes to crack it). It will use ECM, QS, NFS, etc. as needed to find its factors in the best time it can. Use this command:
Code:
factor(125169005719914348816520676003006990595104088750459775327657394996598953675214064913848636757851) Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2013-11-18 at 17:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Oct 2010
191 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
GMP-ECM 7.0-dev [configured with GMP 5.1.3, --enable-asm-redc, --enable-gpu, --enable-assert, --enable-openmp] [ECM] Using B1=1000000, B2=1045563762, polynomial Dickson(6), 8 threads Done 297/2400; avg s/curve: stg1 2.115s, stg2 1.427s; runtime: 137s Run 297 out of 2400: Using B1=1000000, B2=1045563762, polynomial Dickson(6), sigma=1:3545553215 Step 1 took 2116ms Step 2 took 1436ms ********** Factor found in step 2: 1576422053186621557751857821413401 Found probable prime factor of 34 digits: 1576422053186621557751857821413401 Probable prime cofactor 79400694418664331852968752783562533762348560846718294611714451 has 62 digits Last fiddled with by Ralf Recker on 2013-11-18 at 18:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
DB916 Posts |
3.28 seconds for me.
Guess I got lucky .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Oct 2010
101111112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3×1,171 Posts |
Code:
% ./yafu "factor(125169005719914348816520676003006990595104088750459775327657394996598953675214064913848636757851)" -v -threads 16 11/18/13 12:06:23 v1.34.5 @ gree.mayo.edu, System/Build Info: Using GMP-ECM 6.4.4, Powered by GMP 5.1.1 detected Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4650 0 @ 2.70GHz detected L1 = 32768 bytes, L2 = 20971520 bytes, CL = 64 bytes measured cpu frequency ~= 2699.961480 using 20 random witnesses for Rabin-Miller PRP checks =============================================================== ======= Welcome to YAFU (Yet Another Factoring Utility) ======= ======= bbuhrow@gmail.com ======= ======= Type help at any time, or quit to quit ======= =============================================================== cached 78498 primes. pmax = 999983 >> fac: factoring 125169005719914348816520676003006990595104088750459775327657394996598953675214064913848636757851 fac: using pretesting plan: normal fac: using tune info for qs/gnfs crossover div: primes less than 10000 rho: x^2 + 3, starting 1000 iterations on C96 rho: x^2 + 2, starting 1000 iterations on C96 rho: x^2 + 1, starting 1000 iterations on C96 fac: ecm effort reduced from 29.54 to 22.97: input has snfs form pm1: starting B1 = 150K, B2 = gmp-ecm default on C96 fac: ecm effort reduced from 29.54 to 22.97: input has snfs form fac: setting target pretesting digits to 22.97 fac: sum of completed work is t0.00 fac: work done at B1=2000: 0 curves, max work = 30 curves fac: 30 more curves at B1=2000 needed to get to t22.97 ecm: 30/30 curves on C96, B1=2K, B2=gmp-ecm default fac: ecm effort reduced from 29.54 to 22.97: input has snfs form fac: setting target pretesting digits to 22.97 fac: t15: 1.00 fac: t20: 0.04 fac: sum of completed work is t15.18 fac: work done at B1=11000: 0 curves, max work = 74 curves fac: 74 more curves at B1=11000 needed to get to t22.97 ecm: 74/74 curves on C96, B1=11K, B2=gmp-ecm default fac: ecm effort reduced from 29.54 to 22.97: input has snfs form fac: setting target pretesting digits to 22.97 fac: t15: 7.17 fac: t20: 1.04 fac: t25: 0.05 fac: sum of completed work is t20.24 fac: work done at B1=50000: 0 curves, max work = 214 curves fac: 117 more curves at B1=50000 needed to get to t22.97 ecm: 16/128 curves on C96, B1=50K, B2=gmp-ecm default, ETA: 2 sec ecm: found prp34 factor = 1576422053186621557751857821413401 fac: ecm effort reduced from 19.08 to 14.84: input has snfs form fac: setting target pretesting digits to 14.84 fac: t15: 11.74 fac: t20: 2.56 fac: t25: 0.20 fac: t30: 0.01 fac: sum of completed work is t20.99 pretesting / qs ratio was 86.03 Total factoring time = 3.2817 seconds ***factors found*** P34 = 1576422053186621557751857821413401 P62 = 79400694418664331852968752783562533762348560846718294611714451 ans = 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
29·61 Posts |
Code:
Lanczos elapsed time = 48.2060 seconds. Sqrt elapsed time = 0.7590 seconds. SIQS elapsed time = 1325.4398 seconds. pretesting / qs ratio was 0.30 Total factoring time = 1727.5118 seconds ***factors found*** P34 = 1576422053186621557751857821413401 P62 = 79400694418664331852968752783562533762348560846718294611714451 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
Quote:
That's an incredibly lucky find! Do you happen to have the sigma for that?I found the p34 factor as well, with B1=250000 bounds, sigma 1938467591. That group order factors as [ <2, 3>, <3, 1>, <6151, 1>, <65353, 1>, <91961, 1>, <92593, 1>, <153719, 1>, <124836221, 1> ] I get Ralf Recker's sigma (assuming it's 3545553215), as [ <2, 3>, <3, 2>, <4909, 1>, <4460124412039738652099414071, 1> ] so either the Dickson polynomial threw in the large factor, or I need to do something to account for the "1:" before it. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2013-11-18 at 19:01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
66718 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
11/18/13 12:06:27 v1.34.5 @ xxx.yyy.zzz, prp34 = 1576422053186621557751857821413401 (curve 2 stg2 B1=50000 sigma=2945162712 thread=13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
426710 Posts |
That group order is indeed very smooth:
[ <2, 4>, <3, 2>, <7, 1>, <47, 1>, <269, 1>, <6899, 1>, <8243, 1>, <15607, 1>, <17497, 1>, <48487, 1>, <164279, 1> ] GMP-ECM reports that the expected number of curves at those bounds to find a factor of 35 digits is 69076 (34 digits will be close). We collectively have surely run this early ECM way too much, maybe 1000 or 2000 curves? Even so, I estimate a 1-3% chance of finding it at these bounds. Given the ECM depth that YAFU targets, the most likely course of action for this number should be to QS or GNFS it. Either due to sampling bias (we are more likely to post here if we find it than if we fail, or cancel during QS/NFS) or luck, we seem to be finding this factor far more often than that! It's worth noting that the number that this thread is all about is a cofactor of 2^725+1, which has already been factored. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2013-11-18 at 19:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Feb 2013
45810 Posts |
2^1968721+1 has a factor 3 ...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Finding multiples of a real number that are close to a whole number | mickfrancis | Math | 16 | 2017-03-01 07:17 |
| Estimating the number of primes in a partially-factored number | CRGreathouse | Probability & Probabilistic Number Theory | 15 | 2014-08-13 18:46 |
| Number 59649589127497217 is a factor of Fermat number F7 | literka | Miscellaneous Math | 73 | 2013-11-17 10:33 |
| Number of distinct prime factors of a Double Mersenne number | aketilander | Operazione Doppi Mersennes | 1 | 2012-11-09 21:16 |
| Fermat number F6=18446744073709551617 is a composite number. Proof. | literka | Factoring | 5 | 2012-01-30 12:28 |