GPU to 72 status... - Page 214

chalsall · 2013-07-22, 22:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Seems that the server is down....
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.c...www.gpu72.com/

It's just you...

Uptime shows 160 days.

ixfd64 · 2013-07-22, 22:37

http://gpu72.com works for me too. It seems the site checker isn't 100% reliable as it often mistakenly thinks Google is down.

c10ck3r · 2013-07-22, 22:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

It's just you...

Uptime shows 160 days.

@UNC- you might add isup.me to your lineup of "on/off check" sites.

Uncwilly · 2013-07-22, 23:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

Seems that the server is down....

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

It's just you...

Uptime shows 160 days.

I tried several times over the course of an hour. Then I checked dfeojm it agreed. Next time I checked, about 1/4-1/2 hour after posting it was ok.

chalsall · 2013-07-22, 23:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

I tried several times over the course of an hour. Then I checked dfeojm it agreed. Next time I checked, about 1/4-1/2 hour after posting it was ok.

OK... All I can tell you is this:

Code:

[22/Jul/2013:18:23:12 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:23:13 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:23:13 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:30:24 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:30:26 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:32:57 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:32:57 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:36:36 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:36:37 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:45:45 -0400] gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 301 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:58:32 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"
[22/Jul/2013:18:58:32 -0400] www.gpu72.com 50.97.161.229 - - "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "SiteCheck - http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com"

kladner · 2013-07-22, 23:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncwilly

I tried several times over the course of an hour. Then I checked dfeojm it agreed. Next time I checked, about 1/4-1/2 hour after posting it was ok.

I have to second Unc's opinion, though I just waited and did not seek a second opinion. Perhaps he and I are on the same plugged tube in the interwebs? Both View Assignments and Individual Overall Statistics were giving me this:

Quote:

Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, chalsall@ideas4lease.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) Server at www.gpu72.com Port 80

kracker · 2013-07-22, 23:22

I got that same message a while ago as well, seems to be fine now.

henryzz · 2013-07-23, 12:05

Straight after he posted I checked his link and it said down.

chalsall · 2013-07-23, 18:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by henryzz

Straight after he posted I checked his link and it said down.

Sucks to be me, huh?

kladner · 2013-07-23, 20:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Sucks to be me, huh?

Actually, doesn't it suck to have users with bad DNS, behind plugged up routers? I am quite happy to go with the "clogged tubes in the interwebs" theory.

diamonddave · 2013-09-06, 20:57

Is there a reason that the 62M LL range at 73 bit never gets assigned?

If one goes to the request page and leave everything with the default values, we get exponent in the 63M range to factor from 73 to 74. We need to specify the optional range min and max value to get exponent in the 62M range.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2013-07-22, 22:37	#2345
ixfd64 Bemusing Prompter "Danny" Dec 2002 California 5·479 Posts	http://gpu72.com works for me too. It seems the site checker isn't 100% reliable as it often mistakenly thinks Google is down.

2013-07-22, 23:22	#2350
kracker "Mr. Meeseeks" Jan 2012 California, USA 2³×271 Posts	I got that same message a while ago as well, seems to be fine now.

2013-07-23, 12:05	#2351
henryzz Just call me Henry "David" Sep 2007 Cambridge (GMT/BST) 2·3³·109 Posts	Straight after he posted I checked his link and it said down.

2013-09-06, 20:57	#2354
diamonddave Feb 2004 2⁵·5 Posts	Is there a reason that the 62M LL range at 73 bit never gets assigned? If one goes to the request page and leave everything with the default values, we get exponent in the 63M range to factor from 73 to 74. We need to specify the optional range min and max value to get exponent in the 62M range.