![]() |
|
|
#243 | |
|
Oct 2011
7×97 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
1,451 Posts |
i7-2700K with HT off
|
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
|
Jan 2013
22×17 Posts |
I saw 28.1 mentioned earlier, is that only an in house release?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,537 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
"Kyle"
Feb 2005
Somewhere near M52..
3×5×61 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
Jan 2013
1048 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
101001001102 Posts |
Prime95 (version 27.9, build 1) has been unable to communicate a result to the server despite numerous attempts:
[Main thread Aug 21 10:01] Mersenne number primality test program version 27.9 [Main thread Aug 21 10:01] Optimizing for CPU architecture: Core i3/i5/i7, L2 cache size: 256 KB, L3 cache size: 6 MB [Comm thread Aug 21 10:01] Updating computer information on the server [Main thread Aug 21 10:01] Starting workers. [Comm thread Aug 21 10:01] Sending result to server: UID: richs/work-new, M29576419 is not prime. Res64: 2BBB7D00CCE____. We1: 6D8A12E5,7867395,00000000, AID: [Comm thread Aug 21 10:01] [Comm thread Aug 21 10:01] PnErrorResult value missing. Full response was: followed by a lot of html commands. I blanked the last four digits of the residue. Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,537 Posts |
Is there a proxy server involved? Do the proxy settings need to be changed?
Try putting "Debug=2" in the [Primenet] section of prime.txt. Restart prime95. This should output the complete server response to the prime.log file. This response might help us figure out what the problem is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#251 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2×659 Posts |
Debug=2 showed that mersenne.org was newly blocked by our company spam filter. I'll get that corrected. Thanks for the advice, George.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
1,451 Posts |
Every result of Prime95 is in format ( using Prime95 for PRP test)
x*xx^xxxxxxx-1 is not prime. RES64: E57D7936A6CAACCC. We4: 9A9ABA99,00000000 Can output be without We4: 9A9ABA99,00000000 ? And if can what option to use? Last fiddled with by pepi37 on 2013-08-22 at 23:09 |
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·4,909 Posts |
That tells the error status results at the end of the run. It is important for flagging numbers to get a "quick double check". If the test was bad, a new prime could have been missed. Better to double check sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Prime95 version 27.3 | Prime95 | Software | 148 | 2012-03-18 19:24 |
| Prime95 version 26.3 | Prime95 | Software | 76 | 2010-12-11 00:11 |
| Prime95 version 25.5 | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 369 | 2008-02-26 05:21 |
| Prime95 version 25.4 | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 143 | 2007-09-24 21:01 |
| When the next prime95 version ? | pacionet | Software | 74 | 2006-12-07 20:30 |