Treading LL P-1 for 100M TF - Page 22

kladner · 2013-07-04, 16:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

Crikey. It's going to take 16 days to catch up to that, with 13 for the backlog and 3 more for the work you'll do in the next 2 weeks. I do apologize for getting so far behind. There are 2 (332200157, 332200793) in the hopper now, and 2 more in the queue.

You can count my modest contributions in 332M as part of the general trade-off with Uncwilly. The main thing is that work gets done, anyway.

davieddy · 2013-07-06, 12:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

2.5 THz-Days of GPU TF of "What Makes Sense" to 74 in the LL range would be great!

Quote:

Originally Posted by c10ck3r

I will reserve the batch momentarily!

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

But do what actually makes sense.
TF 63M+ to 73.
I promise Chris will be grateful when the LL tsunami hits the fan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Oh, ye of little faith (and little knowledge of what's in the pipeline...).

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

A log jam preceeded by a long fart?
Compare this with the regular 300 LLs/day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Actually, approximately 291.7 LLs/day over the last 30 days.

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

No. There is a quirk in your table updates that means you only count 29 days of data between 00.00 and 08.00 UTC.
Perhaps you could correct this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Incorrect.

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

I despair.
Here is a mini case study of "One LL" between 50M and 60M:

Code:

7th June 19:00
          Total   Change
Today     142557  0
Yesterday 142364  193
1 week    141191  1366
30 days   136562  5995
 
I predict:
 
8th June 02:00
          Total   Change
Today     142557  0
Yesterday 142557  0
1 week    141191+x  1366-x
30 days   136562+y  5995-y
 
where x and y are ~193

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

You are such a twit...
The Visualisation Tool updates once a day.
Only once the current day's data is available do the databases update.
BTW, have I said I think you're a twit?

It updates twice a day. At midday the data is updated with the new data (as of ~7.00 a.m.).
At midnight you do something stupid:
You increment the dates in the title of the "factoring depth" and exponent status tables, and in the case of the status, update the data for"yesterday", "last week" and "last month". As you point out so perceptively, you can't update "today" because you don't yet have the data. This is why between midnigh and midday, the monthly change is for 29 days and not 30.
The remedy is extremely simple:
cease your midnight escapades.

PLEASE DO IT NOW.

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

Look at those tables now.
Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't.
Hence the 29 day change instead of the thirty.
BTW Have I said I think you are a twat?

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Just did. They're not any different than what were there six hours ago.
Not quite sure where you're looking. Perhaps through a bottle?

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

Are you blind as well?
The tables are now exactly as I predicted.
x = 204
y = 187
Careful reading of data is tedious but necessary.
Intelligent interpretation of it will forever be beyond you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

A friend of mine once said to me "Don't fight unarmed combatants". Could you please provide the URLs you're referencing (which my spiders provide)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

I know it's a bit flaky, but I was quoting this obscure resource: http://www.ideas4lease.com/blog/about/
I suggest you do likewise.

Quote:

Originally Posted by c10ck3r

More accurately here

Uncwilly · 2013-07-18, 05:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

Crikey. It's going to take 16 days to catch up to that, with 13 for the backlog and 3 more for the work you'll do in the next 2 weeks. I do apologize for getting so far behind. There are 2 (332200157, 332200793) in the hopper now, and 2 more in the queue.

Well, next week will be very sparse for me. I will be on vacation, thus my laptop will be turning in less than its stock 1 per day. Further, this weekend, 3 of the minions will get an o/s update. At least 2 will be off-line (for P95 purposes) until my return.

Aramis Wyler · 2013-07-21, 16:46

Great Googly Moogly. My computer has been churning out these LMH numbers, and it is only the thought of all that great p-1 work it's buying that kept me going at all. It makes me tired just looking at the computer crunching on these giant numbers all day. But hey, finally found a factor! Anyway:

The first dozen are here. There were no factors. 419.41 GHD/10.

Code:

Number     |  Work   |  Range  |  Date Reserved     |   GHzD   |  Status
332216113  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-05-08 01:26  |  322.47  |  No Factor
332205773  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-05-09 17:16  |  322.47  |  No Factor
332207357  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-05-12 06:08  |  276.41  |  No Factor
332201717  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-05-14 02:35  |  322.48  |  No Factor
332221639  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-05-14 02:35  |  276.38  |  No Factor
332218331  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-05-16 00:07  |  276.40  |  No Factor
332222911  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-05-16 00:07  |  276.40  |  No Factor
Kladner, picking up the slack!  TY!                 |  642.00  |  Factors?
332200793  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/3/2013 23:34    |  276.414 |  No Factor
332200157  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/3/2013 23:34    |  276.414 |  No Factor
332201689  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/3/2013 23:40    |  276.413 |  No Factor
332201237  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/3/2013 23:40    |  276.413 |  No Factor
332204351  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  7/4/2013 22:40    |  184.274 |  No Factor
332201711  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  7/4/2013 21:40    |  184.275 |  No Factor
332204447  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/5/2013 21:40    |  276.411 |  No Factor
332205623  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/5/2013 23:40    |  276.41  |  No Factor
332207131  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/6/2013 17:41    |  276.408 |  No Factor
332206999  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/6/2013 17:41    |  276.409 |  No Factor
332207677  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/7/2013 12:40    |  322.476 |  No Factor
332208007  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/7/2013 13:40    |  276.408 |  No Factor
332213443  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/8/2013 9:40     |  276.403 |  No Factor
332214803  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/8/2013 12:40    |  276.402 |  No Factor
332195761  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/9/2013 7:40     |  276.418 |  No Factor
332216791  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/11/2013 1:46    |  276.4   |  No Factor
332216039  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/10/2013 2:40    |  322.468 |  No Factor
332218409  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/11/2013 4:40    |  322.466 |  No Factor
332217433  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/11/2013 1:46    |  322.467 |  No Factor
332222797  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/12/2013 9:41    |  276.395 |  No Factor
332221691  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/12/2013 9:41    |  276.396 |  No Factor
332223053  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/13/2013 7:40    |  276.395 |  No Factor
332223659  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/13/2013 13:40   |  276.395 |  No Factor
332223713  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/14/2013 2:40    |  276.395 |  No Factor
332224547  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/14/2013 10:40   |  322.46  |  No Factor
332224643  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/14/2013 21:41   |  276.394 |  No Factor
332224663  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/15/2013 15:40   |  276.394 |  No Factor
332224757  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/16/2013 0:40    |  276.394 |  No Factor
332194531  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/16/2013 15:41   |  276.419 |  No Factor
332211203  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/16/2013 22:40   |  276.405 |  No Factor
332225071  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/17/2013 17:40   |  322.459 |  No Factor
332216359  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/17/2013 15:41   |  322.468 |  No Factor
332226289  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/18/2013 12:40   |  322.458 |  No Factor
332225239  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/18/2013 11:40   |  276.393 |  No Factor
332228731  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  7/19/2013 15:40   |   46.065 |  106162503180076083463529 
332227529  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/19/2013 14:40   |  276.391 |  No Factor
332230117  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  7/20/2013 13:40   |  276.389 |  No Factor

1676.741 GHzD/10

kracker · 2013-07-21, 19:20

He is at 2,311 GHz days at the moment.

Sorry, shouldn't of said that.

Aramis Wyler · 2013-08-06, 03:00

The first dozen are here. There were no factors. 419.41 GHD/10. The next set is 2 posts up from this one, garnering up to 1676.741 GHzD/10

Code:

Number     |  Work   |  Range  |  Date Reserved     |   GHzD   |  Status
332240287  |  LL TF  |  75-79  |  2013-08-06 01:44  |  345.476 |  No Factor
332240351  |  LL TF  |  75-79  |  2013-08-05 23:44  |  345.476 |  561155428179204038025743 
332240281  |  LL TF  |  75-79  |  2013-08-05 05:44  |  345.476 |  No Factor
332240201  |  LL TF  |  75-79  |  2013-08-04 17:44  |  345.476 |  No Factor
332238583  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-08-04 06:44  |  322.446 |  No Factor
332238469  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-08-03 15:44  |  322.446 |  No Factor
332238553  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-08-03 08:45  |  322.446 |  No Factor
332238091  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-08-02 15:45  |  322.447 |  No Factor
332238449  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-08-02 10:46  |  322.446 |  No Factor
332237557  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-08-01 11:45  |  322.447 |  No Factor
332237359  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-08-01 10:44  |  276.383 |  No Factor
332235901  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  2013-07-31 13:44  |  184.256 |  No Factor
332237027  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-31 08:44  |  276.384 |  No Factor
332236999  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-31 00:44  |  276.384 |  No Factor
332236481  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  2013-07-30 09:44  |  184.256 |  No Factor
332234003  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  2013-07-30 06:44  |  184.257 |  No Factor
332235269  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-29 19:44  |  276.385 |  No Factor
332235619  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-29 17:44  |  276.385 |  No Factor
332234339  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-28 23:44  |  322.450 |  No Factor
332235179  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-28 22:44  |  276.385 |  No Factor
332233687  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-28 03:44  |  322.451 |  No Factor
332233861  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  2013-07-27 23:44  |  184.257 |  No Factor
332233043  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  2013-07-27 09:45  |  184.258 |  No Factor
332233477  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-27 05:44  |  322.451 |  No Factor
332232757  |  LL TF  |  75-79  |  2013-07-26 15:44  |  345.484 |  No Factor
332231299  |  LL TF  |  78-79  |  2013-07-26 07:44  |  184.259 |  No Factor
332232569  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-25 19:44  |  322.452 |  No Factor
332232473  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-25 13:44  |  322.452 |  No Factor
332231623  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-24 20:44  |  322.453 |  No Factor
332231171  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-24 10:45  |  322.453 |  No Factor
332231101  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-23 22:45  |  322.453 |  No Factor
332228791  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-23 10:44  |  276.390 |  No Factor
332229943  |  LL TF  |  76-79  |  2013-07-23 00:44  |  322.454 |  No Factor
332230277  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-22 13:44  |  276.389 |  No Factor
332230189  |  LL TF  |  77-79  |  2013-07-22 02:43  |  276.389 |  No Factor

Up to 2692.46. Switching the 'slow' card over to regular numbers, but the 580 is still pumping out LMH numbers because Unc seems to have upped his game a bit since before I had left. :)

Uncwilly · 2013-08-06, 06:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by kracker

He is at 2,311 GHz days at the moment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

Up to 2692.46. Switching the 'slow' card over to regular numbers, but the 580 is still pumping out LMH numbers because Unc seems to have upped his game a bit since before I had left. :)

I had a lull week before last. I was away from some of my borg. 2 were down for 9 days. Late last week one worker had run through all of its Stage1 work and was waiting for memory and gathered some LMH from PrimeNet.

2,746 as we speak. I have noticed the effect in the 100M range that you are having. I really do like all of the P-1 kills that I have been getting. I should also be in the top 30 of P-1'ers for the year within the week.

Aramis Wyler · 2013-08-17, 03:25

My 580 died last night. I'm still running on my 480, but until I get the 580 replacement from EVGA I'm going to be hard pressed to keep up with your massive army of minions. I finished the last two numbers my 580 had queued on my 480, but now I've got to turn it back to the 6 numbers I had in my 480's queue.

kladner · 2013-08-17, 04:00

My sincere condolences on your loss. I hope replacement is expeditious. I begin to feel that number crunching is just plain rough on gaming cards.

I'll put something in the queue up in that range.

Aramis Wyler · 2013-08-17, 16:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by kladner

I begin to feel that number crunching is just plain rough on gaming cards.

Thank you for the condolences and the offer. WRT the strain, it could be. But I've been running the 480 in the same loop for years, so I am a bit suspicious of the card on this one. I swear NVidia only releases quality cards every 3 years or so.

kladner · 2013-08-17, 16:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

Thank you for the condolences and the offer. WRT the strain, it could be. But I've been running the 480 in the same loop for years, so I am a bit suspicious of the card on this one. I swear NVidia only releases quality cards every 3 years or so.

You're welcome!

It has seemed that some brands might hold up better than others, so I'm a bit surprised to hear of an EVGA going down. Along with Asus, they seem to be some of the better ones.

I've got one each in progress on the 570 and 460, and two more interleaved with 6xM assignments in the queue for the 570.

2013-08-17, 03:25	#239
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 110101000₂ Posts	Tragedy! My 580 died last night. I'm still running on my 480, but until I get the 580 replacement from EVGA I'm going to be hard pressed to keep up with your massive army of minions. I finished the last two numbers my 580 had queued on my 480, but now I've got to turn it back to the 6 numbers I had in my 480's queue.

2013-08-17, 04:00	#240
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2·3·1,693 Posts	My sincere condolences on your loss. I hope replacement is expeditious. I begin to feel that number crunching is just plain rough on gaming cards. I'll put something in the queue up in that range. Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-08-17 at 04:01

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
To 100M to 75 Bits	petrw1	GPU to 72	6	2017-04-17 04:03
Is LMH > 100M still alive?	TheMawn	LMH > 100M	25	2016-04-18 16:11
100m p-1 and tf	aurashift	Software	18	2016-04-14 13:48
Anyone working in 79.3M - 100M ??	markr	Lone Mersenne Hunters	21	2008-12-21 16:02
100M madness	stars10250	Hardware	8	2008-10-02 15:21

2013-07-21, 19:20	#236
kracker "Mr. Meeseeks" Jan 2012 California, USA 2168₁₀ Posts	He is at 2,311 GHz days at the moment. Sorry, shouldn't of said that.