mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet > MISFIT

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-07-28, 23:39   #166
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×3×1,693 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
To put on the table...

My advise is not to respond to any such "offers". They're simply trying to collect data on you.

IMO, such "class action" contact requests provides no upside to anyone except the sender; almost always never upside to the recipient.
I'm sure you are correct, though this did have all the trappings of a Federal Court notice and the described faults jibed with some of my experiences. However, in this case there is not really anything that Symantec can discover about me that they don't already know. I've been a customer for too long. I suppose that does presume that any part of this was as it claimed to be. But still, any common info on me is undoubtedly easily searchable.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-07-28 at 23:41
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-07-29, 00:48   #167
swl551
 
swl551's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
New Hampshire

23·101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kladner View Post
I'm sure you are correct, though this did have all the trappings of a Federal Court notice and the described faults jibed with some of my experiences. However, in this case there is not really anything that Symantec can discover about me that they don't already know. I've been a customer for too long. I suppose that does presume that any part of this was as it claimed to be. But still, any common info on me is undoubtedly easily searchable.
Class action lawsuits are filed in public court so any case can be verified. I got a check recently for $214 as payout from suite where my local bank was charging customers more than published schedule of fees. I didn't even know about it till a letter from the suing law firm arrived with a check. The letter outlined the suite, the finding and the judgement, the check was issued by the law firm, not the accused bank.
Symantec has been getting sued for decades for one thing or another.

Last fiddled with by swl551 on 2013-07-29 at 01:21
swl551 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-07-29, 01:41   #168
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2×3×1,693 Posts
Default Gross vs Symantec

http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...awsuit_charges

The suit alleged that Symantec offered free online tests which ALWAYS FOUND SERIOUS ERRORS!!!!! In other words, they were running the classic Scareware scam.

This seems to be unrelated to my suspicions of bad results from using their Norton Utilities software. Note that I was not lured into buying by the scare tactics. I was lured in by a really cheap offer when I renewed my Internet Security subscription. I have used a number of versions of Norton Utilities over the years so I did not expect problems. I emphasize that these are only suspicions, and that I do not have unequivocal evidence connecting weird behavior by MISFIT to running their registry cleaner and various optimizing functions of the Speed Disk defragmenter.

I do know that it happened twice after a Windows rebuild when I ran the various utilities shortly after. After the second time, I rebuilt yet again after removing NU 16 from the system. Since, MISFIT has worked without problems. I repeat that I had used these functions of the suite for some time previously without these particular malfunctions occurring.

This is circumstantial, at best, but I got really tired of fixing things and did not care to experiment further.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-07-29 at 01:43
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-28, 20:29   #169
swl551
 
swl551's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
New Hampshire

23×101 Posts
Default MISFIT source released.

The good the bad and the ugly. It is all there on the MISFIT download page.

Please do not interpret the release of the source as a sign I am no longer supporting MISFIT.
swl551 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-29, 01:33   #170
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

33×192 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swl551 View Post
Please do not interpret the release of the source as a sign I am no longer supporting MISFIT.
That's really cool Scott!

Thank you for all your work on this, and the trust involved with releasing the source.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-29, 02:07   #171
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

23×271 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
That's really cool Scott!

Thank you for all your work on this, and the trust involved with releasing the source.
+1 indeed.
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-29, 02:22   #172
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

2·3·1,693 Posts
Default

Same here!
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-30, 02:26   #173
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

23×419 Posts
Default

+1 from here too! I consider that Scott did a very good move by releasing the sources, in spite of the fact that I was in the "privileged" set of the users from the beginning: Scott gave me the source code to "shut my mouth down", hehe, when I told him that I won't run exe files from "untrusted" sources, and he continued to send me the sources without my request, for every new version he has done. Yet, this has nothing to do with me "lobbying" the program, the program is very well written, he invested a lot of time into it, and from the user point of view, as I said, since I have MISFIT, I almost forgot to write batch files... no joke! The program is doing everything for you, if is set right. Its utility is better when you have more cards or when you run mfaktX in more computers. Try it and see. What you have to do is set your copies of mfaktX, set MISFIT, go to the beach and relax...

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2013-09-30 at 02:30
LaurV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-09-30, 16:00   #174
swl551
 
swl551's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
New Hampshire

32816 Posts
Default It is true...

As Laurv mentioned he was silently providing verification of my builds in-case a concern of my credibility became an issue. I also suspected that getting his approval was a sure-fire-way to increase MISFIT usage. The more users, the more ideas, the more fun.

Thanks.
swl551 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-11-15, 03:34   #175
swl551
 
swl551's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
New Hampshire

23·101 Posts
Default MISFIT VERSION 2.5.6

VERSION 2.5.6
1. Added option to have Stalled Process Detection suspended on startup. This is useful if you have scheduled start/stop events and MISFIT is starting up but the next scheduled start event's time is greater than the Stalled Process Detection threshold.
2. Added ability to resume Stalled Process Detection regardless of what triggered the suspension. A warning is provided if trying to resume when no MFAKTx instances are running.
3. Added CurrentGHzDaysWorkToDo and StagedGHzDaysWorkToDo to the productivity reports
4. Fixed some minor UI bugs when MISFIT is put into MONITOR MODE

GET FROM http://mersenneforum.org/misfit/
swl551 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-01-24, 18:28   #176
swl551
 
swl551's Avatar
 
Aug 2012
New Hampshire

23×101 Posts
Default MISFIT VERSION 2.5.8

VERSION 2.5.8
1. Changed the MISFIT support email address to MISFIT.SUPPORT@OUTLOOK.COM
2. Additional small fixes

GET FROM http://mersenneforum.org/misfit/


Due to the lack of activity in the MISFIT forums I will no longer be checking them.

If something comes up please contact me via email at MISFIT.SUPPORT@OUTLOOK.COM
swl551 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
released: MISFIT for MFAKTx version 2.11.0 (31-Jan-2017) swl551 MISFIT 19 2020-11-18 14:29
MISFIT 2.9 swl551 MISFIT 44 2014-12-15 12:46
MfaktX Controller (Windows) Mini-Geek Software 52 2014-02-18 18:27
MFAKTx speed menu (windows) swl551 Software 8 2013-03-07 00:16
(archive)mfaktXHelper - utility for managing mfaktX installations swl551 MISFIT 57 2012-08-12 03:37

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:21.


Tue Jul 27 08:21:24 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 2:50, 0 users, load averages: 2.16, 1.87, 1.80

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.