![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72·131 Posts |
(3.2GHz, DDR1600 memory, no overclocking)
886: 2463 / 4579 / 6288 / 7833 / 8876 / 10249 1.00 / 1.85 / 2.53 / 3.15 / 3.58 / 4.12 923: 3809 / 7048 / 9901 / 12362 / 14144 / 16176 1.00 / 1.85 / 2.60 / 3.23 / 3.70 / 4.23 Speed ratios 1.55 / 1.54 / 1.57 / 1.58 / 1.59 / 1.58 Notice the better scaling in v.886 on i7/3930 vs Haswell, presumably because that version goes to main memory more quickly and there's more memory bandwidth for it to work with. Note also that the new version is a bit faster on Haswell than on the i7/3930 at equivalent thread counts, and by more than the ratio in clock speeds, though the advantage goes down 1.23 / 1.20 / 1.17 / 1.14 ; I suspect this is because Haswell has better low-level caches. This reduces substantially my desire to get an i7/4930 when they are launched. Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2013-07-20 at 06:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72·131 Posts |
With SVN923, it's worth using six threads on a six-core submodule. 2x4 and 4x2 grids are better than 1x8 or 8x1. It looks about twice as fast as the Haswell machine.
Code:
grid / threads / dimensions-per-second (more is better) 1,8 2 105.2 2,4 2 120.6 4,2 2 121.6 8,1 2 103.4 1,8 3 129.2 2,4 3 149.6 4,2 3 150.3 8,1 3 125.5 1,8 4 146.9 2,4 4 175.2 4,2 4 172.8 8,1 4 142.5 1,8 5 160.2 2,4 5 192.5 4,2 5 187.1 8,1 5 152.4 1,8 6 165.9 2,4 6 201.5 4,2 6 199.3 8,1 6 162.7 Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2013-07-20 at 14:36 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to use more threads? | physicist | PrimeNet | 2 | 2018-01-10 17:07 |
| How to use all threads (i7-920) | petsoukos | Software | 2 | 2013-06-04 20:33 |
| Workers, Threads, Helper Threads, Cores, Affinity. | lorgix | Information & Answers | 12 | 2011-01-13 22:31 |
| P-1 with 2 threads? | lycorn | Software | 7 | 2009-09-13 03:19 |
| why less threads displayed | Zeta-Flux | Forum Feedback | 1 | 2006-12-01 18:01 |