Assignment died of dysentery - Page 12

chalsall · 2013-01-02, 21:50

While digging down on the code, I realized that the overall Worker's report was not counting TF and P-1 work as being completed in the case where a factor was found (for the Count columns -- the GHz Days column was).

This has been fixed.

If anyone sees any further inconsistencies, please let me know.

LaurV · 2013-01-03, 10:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

If anyone sees any further inconsistencies, please let me know.

I know you will hate me for this

Here my DC/LL numbers show an "inconsistency" with here and here. There are those 60 GHzDays messed since one year... longer... The overall report is correct. The top lists are wrong (some work appears as LL, but it was pledged as DC, if ye're in doubt, I can look for the discussion at that time, here on the forum). I don't understand why those two (three) reports do not take the data from the same source. In fact, that was the point in time when I stopped being so eager to route all my DC/LL work through gpu72, did not like the "inconsistency"

You know the story...

kladner · 2013-05-06, 20:12

Today May 6, and yesterday, when I submitted TF results (for 60M, 71-73) I got a number of Error 40 -Not needed messages. When I checked the exponents, all in question had been taken from 71-72 by rduerr. I did not take notes yesterday, but today the exponents are

60871597
60871411
60871367
60871361

This is doubly irritating since I'm running only ~1/3 of my usual throughput while a GPU is on medical leave. I am reasonably certain that I was in legitimate possession of the assignments.

chalsall · 2013-05-06, 20:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by kladner

This is doubly irritating since I'm running only ~1/3 of my usual throughput while a GPU is on medical leave. I am reasonably certain that I was in legitimate possession of the assignments.

All I can say is according to GPU72, you were solely assigned these (no reassignment happened), and you got the credit on GPU72 for the work completed.

"Can't we all just get along?" - Rodney King

kladner · 2013-05-06, 21:10

Thanks, Chris. Not much to be said, really. I was just venting.

petrw1 · 2013-05-23, 05:03

These 4, which I am almost certain were assigned from GPU72:

Code:

Hamm 1 62601277  PM1-L  
Hamm 1 62601353  PM1-L  
Hamm 1 62604397  PM1-L  
Hamm 1 62604511  PM1-L

Thx

petrw1 · 2013-06-01, 02:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

These 4, which I am almost certain were assigned from GPU72:

Code:

Hamm 1 62601277  PM1-L  
Hamm 1 62601353  PM1-L  
Hamm 1 62604397  PM1-L  
Hamm 1 62604511  PM1-L

Thx

The 4 above are still in PrimeNet but NOT in GPU72
And now I have these 2 that show up in GPU72 but NOT in Primenet.
There they both still show as belonging to GPU Factoring

BUT...on my PC Client they do show up as belonging to me ....
I just did a "Send new end dates..."
All 6 were successfully sent (i.e. none got an error that they weren't mine)

Code:

Hamm (1) 62155721 LL P-1 74  
Hamm (1) 62316607 LL P-1 74

chalsall · 2013-06-01, 03:56

OK.

I'm not ignoring you; I'm just really busy with "real work".

The reason for the first four is because the proxy for some reason was not able to satisfy your requests from the GPU72 pool, so it passed the request onto Primenet for fullfillment. When I have a moment I'll add these to GPU72's database so you'll get the credit there.

The second two are probably because the proxy was able to fulfill the requests. Thus
Primenet doesn't know you have been sub-assigned them.

Will drill down further when I have some cycles.

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

The 4 above are still in PrimeNet but NOT in GPU72
And now I have these 2 that show up in GPU72 but NOT in Primenet.
There they both still show as belonging to GPU Factoring

BUT...on my PC Client they do show up as belonging to me ....
I just did a "Send new end dates..."
All 6 were successfully sent (i.e. none got an error that they weren't mine)

Code:

Hamm (1) 62155721 LL P-1 74  
Hamm (1) 62316607 LL P-1 74

LaurV · 2013-06-01, 13:24

http://xkcd.com/327/

kladner · 2013-06-01, 15:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

http://xkcd.com/327/

Heheheh!

petrw1 · 2013-06-28, 03:17

At least 5 of my GPU72 LL assignments have been flagged as completed by another user in the last few months .... and in every case it is the same person.

To be fair to him it is possible he had them on a PC; the PC was lost; the assignments were recycled; the PC was resurrected and started them again.

But why always me?
Or are others seeing the same thing?

I'd hate to think that someone with such a fine first name could consider poaching?

2013-01-02, 21:50	#122
chalsall If I May "Chris Halsall" Sep 2002 Barbados 9,767 Posts	Further to this... While digging down on the code, I realized that the overall Worker's report was not counting TF and P-1 work as being completed in the case where a factor was found (for the Count columns -- the GHz Days column was). This has been fixed. If anyone sees any further inconsistencies, please let me know.

2013-05-06, 20:12	#124
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 10158₁₀ Posts	TF assignments partially poached? Today May 6, and yesterday, when I submitted TF results (for 60M, 71-73) I got a number of Error 40 -Not needed messages. When I checked the exponents, all in question had been taken from 71-72 by rduerr. I did not take notes yesterday, but today the exponents are 60871597 60871411 60871367 60871361 This is doubly irritating since I'm running only ~1/3 of my usual throughput while a GPU is on medical leave. I am reasonably certain that I was in legitimate possession of the assignments.

2013-05-23, 05:03	#127
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 2²×3×17×23 Posts	Why do my 4 P-1 assignments not show up in GPU72 These 4, which I am almost certain were assigned from GPU72: Code: Hamm 1 62601277 PM1-L Hamm 1 62601353 PM1-L Hamm 1 62604397 PM1-L Hamm 1 62604511 PM1-L Thx

2013-06-28, 03:17	#132
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 2²×3×17×23 Posts	Who is this Wayne Beardsley and what does he want with my assignments? At least 5 of my GPU72 LL assignments have been flagged as completed by another user in the last few months .... and in every case it is the same person. To be fair to him it is possible he had them on a PC; the PC was lost; the assignments were recycled; the PC was resurrected and started them again. But why always me? Or are others seeing the same thing? I'd hate to think that someone with such a fine first name could consider poaching?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
disk died, prime work lost forever? where to put prime? on SSD or HDD?	emily	PrimeNet	3	2013-03-01 05:49
new assignment	esakertt	PrimeNet	6	2012-11-09 19:51
Want New Assignment	Unregistered	Information & Answers	1	2012-03-28 00:02
Old Assignment	Primeinator	PrimeNet	4	2009-06-04 22:35
How would you know if I died ?	rogue	Soap Box	9	2005-11-08 19:50

2013-05-06, 21:10	#126
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2×3×1,693 Posts	Thanks, Chris. Not much to be said, really. I was just venting.

2013-06-01, 13:24	#130
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 5·1,931 Posts	http://xkcd.com/327/