![]() |
|
|
#111 | |
|
Aug 2012
New Hampshire
23·101 Posts |
Quote:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/126410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 | |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3·5·59 Posts |
Quote:
It's easier just to click the four shortcuts on the desktop to get the instances started. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3·5·59 Posts |
Quote:
Things still did not work exactly as I expected. I thought MISFIT was going to automatically start the batch files when it was started, but it does not. When I click the "Start Batch" the windows do open to the positions and settings desired, so that part works. I can see that automatically trying to start the batch could cause problems (like knowing if they are already running). I believe I can complete this project by adding the four .bat files to the Windows Startup folder, adding a TIMEOUT command to three of the files, specifying, say, a 10, 20 and 30 second delay to stagger the starts. Attached is the window arrangement I have been working to produce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Aug 2012
New Hampshire
23·101 Posts |
Chuck you may find the SpeedController batch system useful
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=17915 or Mini Geek's system http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=18088 |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 | |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3×5×59 Posts |
Quote:
Additional question: If I did a MISFIT "Start Batch" with my four instances already running, would it start an additional four? I guess I could try but why flirt with disaster... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 | |
|
Aug 2012
New Hampshire
23·101 Posts |
Quote:
Just try not to hurt anyone....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2×3×1,693 Posts |
In my setup, selecting "Start Batch" in MISFIT, or running the underlying batch files manually more than once will result in multiple instances in different windows.*
Conversely, selecting "Send Ctl-C" when there are no mfaktX instances running produced an error message along the lines of "I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I could not do that. (See actual message below!) This is Win 7 64 bit running on AMD hardware. * Obviously, not an optimal situation. Just be sure to kill the newer processes and leave only the oldest running. Or kill 'em all and start over. Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-05-05 at 07:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3×5×59 Posts |
I tried "Start batch" with the jobs already running, and a window opened that said "Process Launch Failed". Good behavior. No harm done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Aug 2012
New Hampshire
23·101 Posts |
If you have at least one instance running, and you try to start more from the START PROCESS menu, MISFIT will give you dialog error. If MISFIT does start more instances the INSTANCE name configuration is incorrect.
Stalled process detection is in charge of telling which ones are not running. Last fiddled with by swl551 on 2013-05-05 at 15:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
Aug 2012
New Hampshire
80810 Posts |
Quote:
Does MISFIT STOP all your instances when using the PROCESS STOP menu. Regardless of how you started them it should stop all of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#121 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
236568 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| released: MISFIT for MFAKTx version 2.11.0 (31-Jan-2017) | swl551 | MISFIT | 19 | 2020-11-18 14:29 |
| MISFIT 2.9 | swl551 | MISFIT | 44 | 2014-12-15 12:46 |
| MfaktX Controller (Windows) | Mini-Geek | Software | 52 | 2014-02-18 18:27 |
| MFAKTx speed menu (windows) | swl551 | Software | 8 | 2013-03-07 00:16 |
| (archive)mfaktXHelper - utility for managing mfaktX installations | swl551 | MISFIT | 57 | 2012-08-12 03:37 |