@ Supermods: Error Correction please

[Raman]

I know you had deleted with that incomplete post, I saw,
but someone had restored with that post
and then hard-deleted with the other similar finished post.

What's being the problem with me?

This is being a mathematics related forum, whereby people can keep with their own articles, and then, thereby sharing them with other people. If posted in Wiki, then no one would probably read it, perhaps potentially. If the forum moderators will have good temper, then they could give the users privileges in order to edit with their own posts forever...

Hope that I am not being mistaken...

Yes, this is being a public forum, whereby everyone reads by, shared articles maybe updated with.
Not at all, a chat system or a private place, whereby we don't need to edit with personal chats / talks what are being said with, it doesn't matter - nobody sees them with.

If I can edit with my own posts forever, then there is being a lot of curating work to be done into that thread.

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by Raman

If the forum moderators will have good temper, then they could give the users privileges in order to edit with their own posts forever...

Not going to happen. For various (good) reasons. Please stop asking for this.

It is perfectly acceptable (in the scientific community) to make mistakes. Simply post a follow-up correction.

[Raman]

Errors would lower with the quality / reputation of the forum.
Why don't you realize with them?

And then it is not being fair to misguide with the other people,
if in case that I would wish to give with this thread as a reference point.

Lack of privileges to these users. Lack of support / compassion to the people,
being put with other way, leave alone letting with for the help.

Into the Hindu Mythology, this period is being rightly referred to as the
Kali Yuga. It is a period in which lots of sins are being made, and then
many people have to struggle with difficulties into their own lives...

There are four Yugas, in all,
(1) Satya Yuga, lasting for 1728000 years, in which people will be very affectionate and then understanding to one another.
(2) Treta Yuga, lasting for 1296000 years, people would be quite compassionate, but not that much as in Satya Yuga
(3) Dwapara Yuga, lasting for 864000 years, most people will be good, few people will be bad
(4) Kali Yuga, lasting for 432000 years, started in ~ 3100 BC, in which few people will be good, most people would be bad

As we are being born as humans, we are being born to face difficulties into our own lives, to suffer, ... Not?
Into the Kali Yuga,  people whoever are being bad enough will act as good sometime, and then bad sometime.
provoking anger, rage, fury, mental disturbances for the other people, with in to be, being put altogether with...
And then, it will go worser into the future ... People not doing with anything, except for the sleeping / eating...

As we are being born on to the Earth, we are not being going to live forever... why is this troubles / problems being for the these business?

Delete post being pending to do

http://mersenneforum.org/showthread....17736&p=329118

Someone please delete with this single post, once, and then, I will be rather
happier, not to bother you with, again, back...

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by Raman

Errors would lower with the quality / reputation of the forum.

Incorrect.

Errors, with correction, heighten the quality and reputation of the forum.

Some might learn from your mistakes.

Others will respect that the participants here are willing to admit and correct their errors.

And, personally, while I resonate with Buddhism, and to a lesser degree Hinduism, my fundamental belief system is Science.

[cmd]

Originally Posted by cmd

p r ° b a b | e ... bug in c°ntacts ?


"save" ... descr_ements -|









|°|


:complex33: | :|_aur\/:

... again ... human err°r ??

[Raman]

It would be courteous enough whether
if in case someone
it would be possible to mark the statements
for the k = 71 case inside post #113
and then
for the k = 151 case inside post #119
as FALSE.

A corrected version for them have been posted
into post #130.

Error occurred due to use of an artificial limit of N=10⁶ cases alone... . r r
it is being this that way r r

I am not being foolish enough quite directly to make a new post
such that false statements have been prevalent
into older posts, done enough with them into this case.

to be being done kindly enough please... .

making an article-like related / relevant posting thread / post,
over thereby, therefore,
why so thus
atleast, already
to be being done kindly enough please... .
Thanks to you, in advance
That way,
I will be very much furthermore careful enough, done
into future timings / situations
times scenario locations values for the cases r r
out, entirely off r r,

To myself,

There is being a lot of curating work / job to be done
into thread "Representation by a²+kb² forms", before
it, this can be given as a reference / link elsewhere.

If some moderator can spend some time, say 10 minutes
is being enough done, and only then alone actually...

That way, it is being congested

out, entirely off r r,
for the this thing and then stuff r r

[Raman]

Originally Posted by Raman

It would be courteous enough whether
if in case someone
it would be possible to mark the statements
for the k = 71 case inside post #113
and then
for the k = 151 case inside post #119
as FALSE.

to be being done kindly enough please... . r r r r

Originally Posted by Raman

If in case that someone refers to it into the future time, then
it's being impolite to convey with false information to other people.

snip case means what actually for the value... . r r r r







, and only then alone actually... . r r r r

[Xyzzy]

We cannot figure out what threads you want deleted. Can you be more specific please?

[Raman]

Originally Posted by Xyzzy

We cannot figure out what threads you want deleted. Can you be more specific please?

No threads. Some posts inside "Self-gratification by a²+kb² forms" contain errors, and then they need deletion. They usually being earlier copy of duplicate posts, such that for which an updated newer version is being posted.
for the r r
I took all efforts to type in entire thread by myself over thereby, over time of 2 months, putting it into public forum, over thereby, for the public reference.
out off r r
If in case whether you want onto delete entire threads, then I don't want to talk to you. I don't wish to trust to you, do not having faith over thereby that way

[Xyzzy]

So you want that whole thread deleted?

We are so confused by your request.

[science_man_88]

Originally Posted by Xyzzy

So you want that whole thread deleted?

We are so confused by your request.

I'm pretty sure he says he wants specific posts in the thread gone because of inaccuracies in them.