mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-03-20, 11:53   #1
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

23×5×73 Posts
Default transform your GTX 690 in a quadro

might be of interest for some.
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/project...-counterparts/
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-20, 12:28   #2
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

614110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
Would this unlock the reduced dp speed?
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-20, 12:55   #3
Chuck
 
Chuck's Avatar
 
May 2011
Orange Park, FL

25×29 Posts
Default

Waaaaay too scary for me — I'll leave this to the young bucks.
Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-20, 12:56   #4
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

292010 Posts
Default

quoting the OP
Code:
For those that are just spewing trash on HaD comments without doing a little research... the parts are identical, changing the Device ID just makes the binary blob advertise the additional features to the system, and enables them. It does NOT affect the clock speeds, and will not make the card faster for general day to day work unless you are using the specialised software that takes advantage of these 'professional' features. Changing the ID does not affect the clock speeds as they are configured by the BIOS which we are not touching.

And stock, the GTX690 is clocked FASTER then the K5000 and the Tesla K10, so you are getting a faster card in comparison, not making the GTX690 faster.

I repeat, this does NOT make your GTX 6XX card faster, nor does it make it slower.
His objective was to enable the triple display under linux.
Beyond that, I have no idea.

Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2013-03-20 at 12:59
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-20, 13:25   #5
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

3·23·89 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
quoting the OP
Code:
For those that are just spewing trash on HaD comments without doing a little research... the parts are identical, changing the Device ID just makes the binary blob advertise the additional features to the system, and enables them. It does NOT affect the clock speeds, and will not make the card faster for general day to day work unless you are using the specialised software that takes advantage of these 'professional' features. Changing the ID does not affect the clock speeds as they are configured by the BIOS which we are not touching.
 
And stock, the GTX690 is clocked FASTER then the K5000 and the Tesla K10, so you are getting a faster card in comparison, not making the GTX690 faster.
 
I repeat, this does NOT make your GTX 6XX card faster, nor does it make it slower.
His objective was to enable the triple display under linux.
Beyond that, I have no idea.
I realize. I read through the thread and found no mention.
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-20, 13:25   #6
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

5×7×139 Posts
Default

No difference in speed.

Firejuggler, you also on LinkedIn? :-)

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-20, 13:28   #7
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

55508 Posts
Default

I wander everywhere on the interweb, but not on LinkedIn.
got the link from http://korben.info/
its a french IT info site.

Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2013-03-20 at 13:29
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-21, 15:59   #8
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

23·313 Posts
Default

That's an interesting find! It's almost certainly a warranty-voiding move, though.
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-21, 20:09   #9
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

37·59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ixfd64 View Post
That's an interesting find! It's almost certainly a warranty-voiding move, though.
It is.
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-27, 19:31   #10
tServo
 
tServo's Avatar
 
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhäuser Gate

3·269 Posts
Default

Last year, on a similar blog sit that catered to 3D graphics designers and
animators, I found a post by a guy who worked in a shop that had a
large number of high-end Quadros, a few Teslas, and some of the
fastest GeForce boards. They were all Fermi boards and they used Cuda
for a lot of their intensive crunching. He was their support guy and, for
fun, he took the bios from a Tesla and burned a Quadro and a GeForce
board with it to see what Tesla features he could activate. Surprisingly,
he got some nice results, more so with the Quadro board than the GeForce.
Of course, he didn't get ECC memory since that's a hardware feature but
got almost everything else. This says to me that the Quadros are
more Tesla than GeForce in heritage. In fact, I believe they share the
same drivers. He got a nice performance boost mainly due to the
better memory copy between host and device.
I wish I had saved the link.
But, as has been pointed out, this is waaaaaayyy too scary for me.

Last fiddled with by tServo on 2013-03-27 at 19:32
tServo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-03-27, 20:21   #11
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

37·59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tServo View Post
Last year, on a similar blog sit that catered to 3D graphics designers and
animators, I found a post by a guy who worked in a shop that had a
large number of high-end Quadros, a few Teslas, and some of the
fastest GeForce boards. They were all Fermi boards and they used Cuda
for a lot of their intensive crunching. He was their support guy and, for
fun, he took the bios from a Tesla and burned a Quadro and a GeForce
board with it to see what Tesla features he could activate. Surprisingly,
he got some nice results, more so with the Quadro board than the GeForce.
Of course, he didn't get ECC memory since that's a hardware feature but
got almost everything else. This says to me that the Quadros are
more Tesla than GeForce in heritage. In fact, I believe they share the
same drivers. He got a nice performance boost mainly due to the
better memory copy between host and device.
I wish I had saved the link.
But, as has been pointed out, this is waaaaaayyy too scary for me.
unless you have around maybe $10000 with nothing else to do you could expiriment :p
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help with laplace transform pinnn Information & Answers 4 2018-03-27 02:34
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 speed results benchmark sixblueboxes GPU Computing 3 2014-07-17 00:25
Quadro 600 on Ubuntu 12.10 pdmclean GPU Computing 1 2014-03-16 07:01
NTT transform at (AMD) GPU versus *lucas diep GPU Computing 11 2011-05-11 20:27
All-integer Transform nevarcds Software 3 2004-07-08 10:25

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:51.


Fri Jul 7 14:51:20 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 12:19, 0 users, load averages: 0.92, 1.10, 1.10

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔