![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
23×5×73 Posts |
might be of interest for some.
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/project...-counterparts/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
614110 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
25×29 Posts |
Waaaaay too scary for me — I'll leave this to the young bucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
292010 Posts |
quoting the OP
Code:
For those that are just spewing trash on HaD comments without doing a little research... the parts are identical, changing the Device ID just makes the binary blob advertise the additional features to the system, and enables them. It does NOT affect the clock speeds, and will not make the card faster for general day to day work unless you are using the specialised software that takes advantage of these 'professional' features. Changing the ID does not affect the clock speeds as they are configured by the BIOS which we are not touching. And stock, the GTX690 is clocked FASTER then the K5000 and the Tesla K10, so you are getting a faster card in comparison, not making the GTX690 faster. I repeat, this does NOT make your GTX 6XX card faster, nor does it make it slower. Beyond that, I have no idea. Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2013-03-20 at 12:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
5×7×139 Posts |
No difference in speed.
Firejuggler, you also on LinkedIn? :-) Luigi |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
55508 Posts |
I wander everywhere on the interweb, but not on LinkedIn.
got the link from http://korben.info/ its a french IT info site. Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2013-03-20 at 13:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
23·313 Posts |
That's an interesting find! It's almost certainly a warranty-voiding move, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
37·59 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhäuser Gate
3·269 Posts |
Last year, on a similar blog sit that catered to 3D graphics designers and
animators, I found a post by a guy who worked in a shop that had a large number of high-end Quadros, a few Teslas, and some of the fastest GeForce boards. They were all Fermi boards and they used Cuda for a lot of their intensive crunching. He was their support guy and, for fun, he took the bios from a Tesla and burned a Quadro and a GeForce board with it to see what Tesla features he could activate. Surprisingly, he got some nice results, more so with the Quadro board than the GeForce. Of course, he didn't get ECC memory since that's a hardware feature but got almost everything else. This says to me that the Quadros are more Tesla than GeForce in heritage. In fact, I believe they share the same drivers. He got a nice performance boost mainly due to the better memory copy between host and device. I wish I had saved the link. But, as has been pointed out, this is waaaaaayyy too scary for me. Last fiddled with by tServo on 2013-03-27 at 19:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
37·59 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help with laplace transform | pinnn | Information & Answers | 4 | 2018-03-27 02:34 |
| NVIDIA Quadro K4000 speed results benchmark | sixblueboxes | GPU Computing | 3 | 2014-07-17 00:25 |
| Quadro 600 on Ubuntu 12.10 | pdmclean | GPU Computing | 1 | 2014-03-16 07:01 |
| NTT transform at (AMD) GPU versus *lucas | diep | GPU Computing | 11 | 2011-05-11 20:27 |
| All-integer Transform | nevarcds | Software | 3 | 2004-07-08 10:25 |