![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
23·53 Posts |
[Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] Sending result to server: UID: staffen/Romeo, M49306487 is not prime. Res64: [SNIP] AID:
[Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] [Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] PrimeNet success code with additional info: [Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] CPU credit is 90.3267 GHz-days. I finished a ll test issued by gpu72 (finally) but on gpu72 it says: Warning:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
I granted you access to fetch LL/DC work, but I didn't ask for your PrimeNet Display Name. This is what Spidy needs to know to grant you the "credits" for LL and DC work. The warning you reported is a safety feature, intended to warn people if they've been "poached". I really need to climb back into the GPU72 code base to fix some bugs, and add some needed features.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
42410 Posts |
I think stupid is probably a stretch. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
![]() I try to hold myself to the highest of standards. If I don't, someone else will. My bosses. LaurV. Or Dubslow. Et al. Yes, I'm paranoid. The question is am I paranoid enough? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
32×5×29 Posts |
Paranoia the Destroyer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSbSueq_KSY
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
There's a lot to be said for being paranoid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
23·53 Posts |
Well you know what they say about being paranoid.
You only have to be right once. :D |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
29·3·7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22·23·103 Posts |
Even a stopped clock is right - twice a day.
(It can be argued that for this objective function [number of times being right per day], it is more precise than almost any running clock.) |
|
|
|