![]() |
|
|
#2047 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
2×23×179 Posts |
Forgive us for being a little slow, but how exactly do we set up MISFIT to provide what GIMPS needs the most?
We have attached a picture of the tab that we think is set up properly. We assumed that there would be a button for "Let GPU72 Decide!" and then everything else would gray out, but the other options are still active. Or are they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2048 | |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
2·23·179 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2049 |
|
Aug 2012
New Hampshire
23·101 Posts |
You are not doing anything wrong. MISFIT is designed to prevent overly-aggresive uploaders from hammering GIMPS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2050 |
|
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
23×53 Posts |
There's what, 200 of us doing gpu trial factoring? If the primenet servers can't handle 150-200 hits per hour, we're in trouble. :)
Off topic though! I try to do p-1 work on my cpu, and I TF exponents to 74 if they're above 60M as per James' chart. Thus I am confused why, when I go to get p-1 exponents with the highest TF factor, none come back that are factored above 73. What happens there? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2051 |
|
Aug 2012
New Hampshire
23·101 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2052 | ||
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
100110001001112 Posts |
Quote:
If each worker submits once an hour it will not be a problem. Quote:
GPU72 keeps 500 of the lowest candidates TFed to at least 73 bits in the cache for P-1'ing. If you TF to 74, but there are more than 500 candidates at 73 below, those at 74 will be released back to Priimenet to manage as it deems appropriate. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2053 |
|
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
23×53 Posts |
Ah, I see. The server chooses the lowest candidates for p-1'ing. I can see how that would make sense.
Do you think it makes more sense than queing up the 500 most Tf'd candidates? Maybe I am wrong in thinking that the highest TF'd candidates are the best ones for p-1 work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2054 | |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
Quote:
However, since P-1 is so desperately behind the wavefront, the lower it is, the more likely it is to complete the LL test without P-1 at all; so we do lowest first. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2055 |
|
"Bill Staffen"
Jan 2013
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
23·53 Posts |
Does that imply that primenet offers up lowest number first, not highest factored first to p95?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2056 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
There are already 7 candidates in the 59M range, and 38 in the 60M range, which have had a LL completed without a P-1 done. Also, "Spidy" is most efficient at simply reserving the lowest candidates without a P-1 done, since that's what Primenet offers first. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2057 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Status | Primeinator | Operation Billion Digits | 5 | 2011-12-06 02:35 |
| 62 bit status | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 27 | 2008-09-29 13:52 |
| OBD Status | Uncwilly | Operation Billion Digits | 22 | 2005-10-25 14:05 |
| 1-2M LLR status | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 2 | 2005-03-13 17:03 |
| Status of 26.0M - 26.5M | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 25 | 2004-06-18 16:46 |