Nvidia Kepler - Page 14

LaurV · 2012-05-19, 15:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl M Johnson

Good point, LaurV.
Even though them GK110 Teslas have tasty features from CUDA coder's POV, NV just wants too damn much for em.
Also, expect GK 110 GeForce to have 1/4 of dp fp performance of it's Tesla variant, as usual.
Should be better than any current GeForce cards though.

Offtop: that water cooling solution, is that Zalman's ?

just for new readers, Karl's post referred to this post which was in front of it, and later moved to the cooling section. My reply is in that thread too. There I said nVidia priced K10 to $2000 and announced K20 for the end of the year (maybe Xmass??) but did not say the price. I expect a $2500 and it seems I am not far away from what other say if you google for "tesla k10 k20"

Jeff Gilchrist · 2012-05-19, 17:10

Ok, so the GeForce "kepler's" will probably be the 780 model then? Based on the info published will they be a lot slower than the 580 for GPGPU stuff like the new 680 is?

Karl M Johnson · 2012-05-20, 13:31

Yeah, presumably, it will be called GTX 780.
We dont know whether it will be slower or faster than GTX 580, but it should be.
The GK104 Keplers were slower because of sm_30 arch, and NV promised the GK110 to be more compute orientated.
Let's just hope the green company sticks to its promises.

nucleon · 2012-05-20, 15:31

Think of the GTX680 as a derivative of the GTX560Ti, and the 'proposed' GTX780 as a derivative of the GTX580.

Nickname GTX680 as 'little Kepler'.

GTX680 > GTX560Ti, so as long as Nvidia continue to release 'big Kepler' as GTX780 then I think we're good to go. If Nvidia release an updated 'little Kepler' as GTX780, then I won't be a happy camper :(

I'm keeping my GTX580s.

-- Craig

Brain · 2013-02-14, 05:47

Hi,

the GK110 is now approaching. It seems to provide 4.5 Teraflops consuming 300W. Latest technical rumors:

http://videocardz.com/39536/nvidia-g...-february-18th

Bye, Brain

LaurV · 2013-02-14, 06:09

This is slower then a 690, and sells for about 900 bucks...
I would still wait for a 20nm Maxwell....

Behind of 580, there is nothing yet to compete, for performance, price and consumption. In fact, if you don't want to CudaLucas too much, then you might be much better with a 570 (much lower price and a bit lower consumption, for about the same mfaktc performance) or even an AMD card.

ixfd64 · 2013-02-17, 08:05

The GTX Titan is supposed to have 1.3 TFLOPS of double precision: http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-g...-18th-february

2012-05-20, 15:31	#147
nucleon Mar 2003 Melbourne 5·103 Posts	Think of the GTX680 as a derivative of the GTX560Ti, and the 'proposed' GTX780 as a derivative of the GTX580. Nickname GTX680 as 'little Kepler'. GTX680 > GTX560Ti, so as long as Nvidia continue to release 'big Kepler' as GTX780 then I think we're good to go. If Nvidia release an updated 'little Kepler' as GTX780, then I won't be a happy camper :( I'm keeping my GTX580s. -- Craig Last fiddled with by nucleon on 2012-05-20 at 15:32 Reason: added 'proposed'

2013-02-14, 05:47	#148
Brain Dec 2009 Peine, Germany 331 Posts	Release in February Hi, the GK110 is now approaching. It seems to provide 4.5 Teraflops consuming 300W. Latest technical rumors: http://videocardz.com/39536/nvidia-g...-february-18th Bye, Brain Attached Thumbnails

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Nvidia GTX 745 4GB ???	petrw1	GPU Computing	3	2016-08-02 15:23
Nvidia Pascal, a third of DP	firejuggler	GPU Computing	12	2016-02-23 06:55
Pitfall when upgrading to Windows 10 with Fermi vs Kepler/Maxwell	Brain	Hardware	16	2015-11-26 10:24
AMD + Nvidia	TheMawn	GPU Computing	7	2013-07-01 14:08
What can I do with my nvidia GPU?	Surge	Software	4	2010-09-29 11:36

2012-05-19, 17:10	#145
Jeff Gilchrist Jun 2003 Ottawa, Canada 3·17·23 Posts	Ok, so the GeForce "kepler's" will probably be the 780 model then? Based on the info published will they be a lot slower than the 580 for GPGPU stuff like the new 680 is?

2012-05-20, 13:31	#146
Karl M Johnson Mar 2010 3×137 Posts	Yeah, presumably, it will be called GTX 780. We dont know whether it will be slower or faster than GTX 580, but it should be. The GK104 Keplers were slower because of sm_30 arch, and NV promised the GK110 to be more compute orientated. Let's just hope the green company sticks to its promises.

2013-02-14, 06:09	#149
LaurV Romulan Interpreter "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 41×251 Posts	This is slower then a 690, and sells for about 900 bucks... I would still wait for a 20nm Maxwell.... Behind of 580, there is nothing yet to compete, for performance, price and consumption. In fact, if you don't want to CudaLucas too much, then you might be much better with a 570 (much lower price and a bit lower consumption, for about the same mfaktc performance) or even an AMD card.

2013-02-17, 08:05	#150
ixfd64 Bemusing Prompter "Danny" Dec 2002 California 2³·313 Posts	The GTX Titan is supposed to have 1.3 TFLOPS of double precision: http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-g...-18th-february