![]() |
|
|
#551 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
2A1C16 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#552 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2·32·353 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#553 |
|
Feb 2011
101000112 Posts |
Your teachers have conditioned your mind
to use badly flawed axioms and have thus destroyed your ability to think rationally. Of course, they will never admit to that, because they don't want to be held accountable, But trust me, a lot of those so called "institutions of higher learning" have known about my equations for years and are doing their best to keep them a secret. You see, instead of revising their textbooks, they would rather program you with nonsense. Perhaps you should find a "personal injury lawyer" and sue your school for having turned your brain into mush. If you need a witness to testify to that, then I will be more than happy to oblige. Now, here is the question that should convince both you and everyone else here, that those so called symmetric and substiturion axioms of equality are really nothing but a load of rubbish. Given the identity: can we substitute Just try to answer this simple yes or no question without going into one of your hand waving song and dances. After all, you are neither Michael Jackson, nor a geisha, and a simple yes or no question about a "self evident truth" should not require any commentary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#554 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
5×1,931 Posts |
Yes.
Why not? Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2012-11-10 at 17:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#555 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
22·5·72·11 Posts |
Quote:
He states without proof that (T/T)*c^1 is identically equal to T*(c/T). He doesn't give a proof of that statement. And, indeed, this is not an identity if T=0. Ah, I see what you may be saying. IFF it's an identity, then T is non-zero. In that case, then I agree with the admissibility of the original substitution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#556 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×32×353 Posts |
Don, respond to post 533. You have conveniently been ignoring it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#557 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2×32×353 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#558 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
22×19×137 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#559 |
|
Jun 2003
2×3×7×112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#560 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
81D16 Posts |
Sounds like something http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_Horizon would say.
"The very nature of reality itself." etc Makes me cringe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#561 | |
|
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
13·89 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do-it-yourself, crank, mersenne prediction thread. | Uncwilly | Miscellaneous Math | 85 | 2017-12-10 16:03 |
| non-standard sieve | req | Math | 4 | 2011-12-06 04:17 |
| Crank Emoticon | Mini-Geek | Forum Feedback | 21 | 2007-03-06 19:21 |
| Remove my thread from the Crank Forum | amateurII | Miscellaneous Math | 40 | 2005-12-21 09:42 |
| Standard Deviation Problem | jinydu | Puzzles | 5 | 2004-01-10 02:12 |