|
2012-11-17, 16:11
|
#12 |
May 2003
30138 Posts |
Sorry, I've been really busy and forgot to check in. It looks like I'm too late to weigh in, but I think everything you all said is sound.
Cheers, Zeta-Flux |
|
|
2012-11-17, 20:15
|
#13 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3×23×89 Posts |
[QUOTE=Zeta-Flux;318722]Sorry, I've been really busy and forgot to check in. It looks like I'm too late to weigh in, but I think everything you all said is sound.
Cheers, Zeta-Flux[/QUOTE] If your forgetting to go on mersenneforum it might be worth subscribing by email to the moves thread so you can tell when a move is made. |
|
|
|
2012-11-18, 20:15
|
#14 |
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2×859 Posts |
I'm ok with proceeding on a 3/4's vote in the future.
|
|
|
|
2012-11-18, 20:41
|
#15 |
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
[QUOTE=richs;318874]I'm ok with proceeding on a 3/4's vote in the future.[/QUOTE]
Yes, but in my case I am also always open to changing my "vote" in the light of insights from other team members. This is less likely while we're still in the opening, but later in the game we may reach a situation where one team member discovers something in the position which changes everyone else's perception. For that reason, I think we should normally strive to wait for everyone to contribute. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 1 | 2016-10-25 18:03 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-10-05 15:50 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-28 19:51 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-19 19:56 |
